Interval Aerobic Training and Continious Training

NCT06525233 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: aerobicexercise
• Study Type: observational
• Target: 40
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

This research is comparing the effects of interval and continuous training which are the two types of aerobic training on persons' life quality and exercise capacity on coronary artery disease patients.

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease; Exercise Addiction

Keywords

continious training; interval training

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• the effect of intermittent and continuous aerobic exercise on exercise capacity

  we used the symptom-limited exercise test and six minute walking test (6DYT). All evaluation tests are done before and after training. Participants were into randomised two groups: interval aerobic training (AAE) and continuous aerobic training (SAE). Training lasted three times a week during 6 weeks. In both groups, significant changes were found in evaluation tests scores after the rehabilitation program (p\<0,05). But only AAE group have important statistical difference comparing to SAE group on test time and 6DYT scores.

  30 minutes 3 times a week during 6 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (1)

• the effect of intermittent and continuous aerobic exercise on life quality

  30 minutes 3 times a week during 6 weeks

Study Arms (1)

Treatment

humans that diagnosed as coronary artery disease, joined two aerobic exercise groups. One of this group includes interval exercise and the other one includes continuous exercise.

Other: Physiotherapy and rehabilitation

Interventions

Physiotherapy and rehabilitation OTHER

The aerobic exercise is very crucial part of cardiac rehabilitation. This study compares the effects of interval and continuous training which are the two types of aerobic training on persons' life quality and exercise capacity diagnosed coronary artery disease patients.

Treatment

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 40 Years - 80 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
• Sampling Method: Probability Sample

Study Population

Name-Surname, age, sex, body-weight index, educational status, married/single/divorced, job and clinical background (If has any surgery and myocardial infarction)

You may qualify if:

• diagnosed coronary artery disease
• aged between 40-80
• over %55 ejection fraction

You may not qualify if:

• mental and physical disability
• unstable angina pectoris
• thrombophlebitis

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Istanbul Medipol University Hospital: lead

Study Sites (1)

Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Center

Bursa, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Interventions

Physical Therapy Modalities; Rehabilitation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Coronary Disease; Myocardial Ischemia; Heart Diseases; Cardiovascular Diseases; Arteriosclerosis; Arterial Occlusive Diseases; Vascular Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Therapeutics; Aftercare; Continuity of Patient Care; Patient Care; Health Services; Health Care Facilities Workforce and Services

Study Officials

• Fatma Mutluay

  medipol univercity

  STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

• Study Type: observational
• Observational Model: CASE CROSSOVER
• Time Perspective: PROSPECTIVE
• Target Duration: 6 Weeks
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Dr.

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: August 17, 2019
• First Posted: July 29, 2024
• Study Start: May 5, 2018
• Primary Completion: April 2, 2019
• Study Completion: May 20, 2019
• Last Updated: July 29, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-07

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will share
• Shared Documents: CSR
• Time Frame: 2 years
• Access Criteria: karacaoglugulay@gmail.com

Locations

TU (1)