Achieving nuTritional Target in criticAlly Ill patieNts With iMpairEd gastroiNtesTinal Dysfunction
ATTAINMENT
1 other identifier
interventional
164
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Clear study hypothesis / research question It has already been proven that a prolonged negative energy balance during intensive care stay is an independent risk factor for mortality. Although it was thought that achivieng optimal delivery of calories will prevent nutritional deficits in critically ill patients, published randomized controlled trials failed to confirm this hypothesis. Combinging enteral and parenteral support may be an efficent strategy to reach nutritional target in critically ill patients. According to the current guidelines the use of suplemental parenteral nutrition (SPN) should be considered when energy targets are not achieved by enteral (EN) route, however, no clear data regarding timing, amount and composition is specified. Moreover, based on recente published data overfeeding should also be avoided, considering the negative impact on outcome. Nutritional support for critically ill patients was focused more on preventing caloric and protein deficits and no great emphasis was placed on the efficiency of intestinal absorption. Gastrointestinal dysfunction is a prevalent reported complication that may contribute to falling short of meeting nutritional goals. This encompasses a wide spectrum of symptoms, such as impaired gastric emptying, ileus or impaired intestinal absorbtion, exposing patients to feeding intolerance, malnutrition and worse outcomes. No standard definition and monitoring techniques are so far available for the diagnostic of feeding intolerance. Although increased gastric residual volume (GRV) is the most used parameter for highlighting feeding intolerance, a controversy regarding the adequate threshold of GRV persists. Acetaminophen absorption test has been previously proposed as a diagnostic tool to asses impaired gastric emptying and intestinal absorbtion. Besides intestinal absorbtion, efficient utilization of macronutients should also be assessed, considering that critically ill patients have varying metabolic conditions and may not be able to metabolically handle adminsitered substrates. As a result body composition analysis should be taken into account in order to obtain a dynamic quantification, especially, of the mucle mass compartiments. Therefore the following low-interventional study is designed to investigate the hypothesis regarding energy and protein intake achievement in critically ill patients with diagnosed impaired gastrointestinal dysfunction to whom tailored nutritional support is administered. Taking into account that we aim to identify patients with early-phase gastrointestinal dysfunction impaired gastric emptying and reduced intestinal absorbtion (diagnosed using ultrasound gastric residual volume and byacetaminiphen absorbtion test) will serve as defining factors. Patients will be randomized to receive nutritional support either according to the EN protocol or enteral trophic feed + SPN protocol. Differences in rectus femoris thickness measured on admission, on day 10 and 15, variation of lean body mass measured by bioelectrical impedance on admission on day 10 and 15, and differences between groups in muscle function using handgrip dynamometer will also be evaluated in both groups.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 14, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 19, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2026
November 6, 2024
November 1, 2024
2.2 years
July 14, 2024
November 4, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Differences in the attainment (in percentage) of daily calorie
Differences in the attainment (in percentage) of daily calorie pre-set targets\* calculated from the rest energy expenditure measured (mREE) using indirect calorimetry (IC) between the EN and SPN groups. \*pre-set targets are defined according to the described nutritional protocol (see below Section e. Nutritional protocol) as 25 % of the energy target determined by indirect calorimetry by day 2, 50% by day 3 to 4 and 75 % at day 4. After day 4 the pre-set target is gradually increased to 100 %.
day 15
Differences in the attainment (in percentage) of daily protein
Differences in the attainment (in percentage) of daily protein pre-set targets\* calculated from the rest energy expenditure measured (mREE) using indirect calorimetry (IC) between the EN and SPN groups. \*pre-set targets are defined according to the described nutritional protocol (see below Section e. Nutritional protocol) as 25 % of the energy target determined by indirect calorimetry by day 2, 50% by day 3 to 4 and 75 % at day 4. After day 4 the pre-set target is gradually increased to 100 %.
day 15
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Differences in rectus femoris thickness measured on admission, on day 10 and 15
day 15
Variation of phase angle between two groups
day 15
Variation of lean body mass measured by bioelectrical
day 15
muscle force measured on day 15
day 15
energy adequacy
day 15
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
EN group
NO INTERVENTIONenteral nutrition intake will progressively be increased according to the gastrointestinal tolerance (evaluated based on ultrasound guided gastric residual volume measurement) until the target of 100% is attained following admission to the ICU.
Supplemental parenteral nutrition (SPN) group
EXPERIMENTALgradually initiate supplemental parenteral nutrition in order to achieve the target of 80% by the fifth day. Trophic feed will be administered to cover the remaining 20% of the targeted nutrition intake.
Interventions
Nutritional targets are based on ESPEN guidelines recommendation (calories administration based on indirect calorimetry study, proteins 1.3 g/kg/day). From the first day of ICU admission indirect calorimetry will be performed daily in order to evaluate energy requirements. On the fourth day, the patient will undergo a gastric residual volume measurement and a paracetamol absorption test. If gastrointestinal dysfunction is detected, the patient will be assigned to a study group based on the randomization protocol. The SPN group will gradually initiate supplemental parenteral nutrition in order to achieve the target of 80% by the fifth day. Trophic feed will be administered to cover the remaining 20% of the targeted nutrition intake.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All adults (\> 18 years old)
- Mechanical ventilation for more than four days,
- Controlled shock state (hemodynamic and tissue perfusion goals are reached) - Impaired intestinal absorbtion, defiend by both ultrasound measurement of gastric residual volume and paracetamol absorbtion test
You may not qualify if:
- patients on non-invasive mechanichal ventilation
- contraindication for EN for \> 48 h after admission
- patients with gastrointestinal surgical intervention within 3 months,
- history of malabsorption, inflammatory bowel disease
- short bowel syndrom
- anorexia nervosa
- gastrointestinal bleeding
- cirrhosis
- traumatic brain injury
- subarahnoidal hemorrhage
- neoplasia
- post cardiac arrest patients
- patients on chronic therapy with corticosteroids
- pregnant women.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Romanian Society for Enteral and Parenteral Nutritionlead
- Fresenius Kabicollaborator
- Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacycollaborator
- Bucharest Emergency Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Clinical Emergency Hospital of Bucharest
Bucharest, Romania
Related Publications (7)
Berger MM, Soguel L, Charriere M, Theriault B, Pralong F, Schaller MD. Impact of the reduction of the recommended energy target in the ICU on protein delivery and clinical outcomes. Clin Nutr. 2017 Feb;36(1):281-287. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2015.12.002. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
PMID: 26775753BACKGROUNDChapman MJ, Deane AM. Gastrointestinal dysfunction relating to the provision of nutrition in the critically ill. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2015 Mar;18(2):207-12. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000149.
PMID: 25603226RESULTBerger MM, Pantet O, Jacquelin-Ravel N, Charriere M, Schmidt S, Becce F, Audran R, Spertini F, Tappy L, Pichard C. Supplemental parenteral nutrition improves immunity with unchanged carbohydrate and protein metabolism in critically ill patients: The SPN2 randomized tracer study. Clin Nutr. 2019 Oct;38(5):2408-2416. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.10.023. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
PMID: 30448193RESULTBerger MM, Burgos R, Casaer MP, De Robertis E, Delgado JCL, Fraipont V, Goncalves-Pereira J, Pichard C, Stoppe C. Clinical nutrition issues in 2022: What is missing to trust supplemental parenteral nutrition (SPN) in ICU patients? Crit Care. 2022 Sep 10;26(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04157-z.
PMID: 36088342RESULTToledo DO, Freitas BJ, Dib R, Pfeilsticker FJDA, Santos DMD, Gomes BC, Silva-Jr JM. Peripheral muscular ultrasound as outcome assessment tool in critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation: An observational cohort study. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2021 Jun;43:408-414. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2021.03.015. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
PMID: 34024548RESULTMoonen HPFX, Van Zanten ARH. Bioelectric impedance analysis for body composition measurement and other potential clinical applications in critical illness. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2021 Aug 1;27(4):344-353. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000840.
PMID: 33967207RESULTReintam Blaser A, Preiser JC, Fruhwald S, Wilmer A, Wernerman J, Benstoem C, Casaer MP, Starkopf J, van Zanten A, Rooyackers O, Jakob SM, Loudet CI, Bear DE, Elke G, Kott M, Lautenschlager I, Schaper J, Gunst J, Stoppe C, Nobile L, Fuhrmann V, Berger MM, Oudemans-van Straaten HM, Arabi YM, Deane AM; Working Group on Gastrointestinal Function within the Section of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Nutrition (MEN Section) of ESICM. Gastrointestinal dysfunction in the critically ill: a systematic scoping review and research agenda proposed by the Section of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Nutrition of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Crit Care. 2020 May 15;24(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-02889-4.
PMID: 32414423RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Cristian Cobilinschi, MD, PhD
Bucharest Emergency Hospital
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Liliana Mirea, Md PhD
Bucharest Emergency Hospital
- STUDY CHAIR
Radu Tincu, MD PhD
Bucharest Emergency Hospital
- STUDY CHAIR
Ioana Grințescu, Profesor
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator, MD, PhD,
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 14, 2024
First Posted
July 19, 2024
Study Start
October 1, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Last Updated
November 6, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share