12-hour Time Limited Feeding in Critical Care
The Safety and Feasibility of a 12-hour Time-Limited Enteral Feeding Protocol in Critically Ill Adults
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is being done to assess the feasibility and safety of a time-restricted 12-hour enteral feeding protocol (experimental group) in comparison to a standard-of-care, 24-hour enteral feeding protocol (control group) in critically ill patients. Investigators hope to gain knowledge about how these feeding schedules affect feeding tolerance, blood sugar control, and other factors affecting critically ill adult patients.
- Investigators expect that the 12-hour feeding protocol will be tolerated similarly to the 24-hour feeding protocol and will not result in a greater number of adverse events related to feeding.
- Investigators expect that the proportion of participants in both groups receiving at least 75% of their estimated nutrition needs will be similar.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 4, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 19, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 25, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 4, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2026
ExpectedApril 28, 2026
April 1, 2026
11 months
December 4, 2024
April 27, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Safety and feasibility
Safety will be measured by the need for pausing or discontinuing enteral feeds, gastrointestinal complications (including vomiting, abdominal distention, and diarrhea), other feeding complications (e.g., aspiration, gastric residuals), and hypoglycemic events. Feasibility is defined as the percentage of patients who received ≥75% of their prescribed nutrition goal, and the logistical feasibility of collecting study data.
From randomization up to 10 days
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Glycemic control
From randomization up to 10 days
Sleep quantity
From randomization up to 10 days
Circadian rhythm of skin surface temperature
From randomization up to 10 days
Other Outcomes (3)
Mental health
From 1 month and 3 months post-discharge
Cognitive health
From 1 month and 3 months post-discharge
Impact of Health Status on Quality of life
From 1 month and 3 months post-discharge
Study Arms (2)
Continuous 24 hour feeding (CONT24).
ACTIVE COMPARATOR24 hour tube feeding is the standard of care. They will receive tube feeding continuously over 24 hours daily.
12-hour time-restricted feeding (TRF12)
EXPERIMENTALThe 12-hour time-restricted feeding group will receive the same amount of nutrition in 12 hours as would be needed in 24 hours. The hourly feeding rate will double.
Interventions
The 12 hour feeding group will receive tube feeding only over a 12 hour period (6:00 AM to 6:00 PM feeding schedule).
Patients in this control group will receive the standard of care which is tube feeding continuously over 24 hours.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults (≥18 years of age)
- With critical illness (hospitalized in an intensive care unit with a status of "ICU")
- Who have received orders for continuous enteral nutrition
You may not qualify if:
- "Comfort Measures Only" status
- Have orders to receive trickle feedings (feeding rate ≤10mL/hr)
- Recent surgical procedure on the GI tract (within previous 5 days at time of recruitment) or admission for GI bleed
- Receiving continuous sedation
- Expected to undergo a procedure requiring removal of study devices in the three days following enrollment
- History of malabsorptive bariatric surgery
- Admitted for a burn injury
- Known intolerance to feeding rates \>100mL/hr
- Current diagnosis of pancreatitis, ileus or gastroparesis (only if using a gastrostomy tube)
- Requiring intermittent or continuous renal replacement therapy
- Pregnant or lactating
- On an intermittent feeding schedule
- Nutritional needs would require a rate higher than 120mL/hr on TRF12 protocol
- Lack of clearance by primary physician
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Of Kansas Health System
Kansas City, Kansas, 66103, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Felicia Steger, PhD, MS, RD
University of Kansas Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 4, 2024
First Posted
December 19, 2024
Study Start
March 25, 2025
Primary Completion
March 4, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2026
Last Updated
April 28, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04