Effect of Different Feeding Method on Gastrointestinal Function of Critical Patients
DFM-GFC
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The intestine is the most vulnerable target organ in septic patients and is the first to be damaged organ in multiple organ dysfunction syndrome(MODS).Therefore, improving intestinal motility and mucosal barrier function is critical to the treatment of sepsis. Many studies have shown that, early enteral nutrition(EN) in patients with sepsis helps prevent and treat intestinal dysfunction, reducing ICU mortality and length of stay in ICU. However, there is little research on feeding methods. In this study the investigators will compare the outcomes of different feeding methods: continuously-pumped in 24 hours, continuouslypumped in 16 hours and intermittently-pumped through the stomach tube. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of different feeding methods on intestinal function in septic patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 8, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 13, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2025
CompletedMarch 5, 2024
March 1, 2024
4.5 years
January 8, 2020
March 3, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The mean time(hours) that reach to the caloric goal in every group
Caloric goals using 25 kcal/kg (ideal body weight) for caloric need calculated by a single nutritionist.
First 5 days after intervention
Secondary Outcomes (4)
The rate of onset of Gastric residual (%)
First 5 days after intervention
Abdominal pressure (mmHg)
baseline and 5th day
the rate of new onset pneumonia (%)
First 5 days after intervention
The rate(%) of people whom can reaching the caloric goal
First 5 days after intervention
Other Outcomes (2)
length of ICU stay (in days)
up to 12 weeks
ICU mortality rate (%)
28 days after intervention
Study Arms (3)
24-hours group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe critical patients randomized to 24-hours group will be received enteral nutrition preparation by 24 hours of continuously pumping through stomach tube every day. Feeding will be started within 24 hours in admission of ICU. The time of therapy is 5 days.
16-hours group
EXPERIMENTALThe critical patients randomized to 16-hours group will be received enteral nutrition preparation by 16 hours of continuously pumping through stomach tube every day. Feeding will be started within 24 hours in admission of ICU. The time of therapy is 5 days.
intermittent group
EXPERIMENTALThe critical patients randomized to intermittent group will be received enteral nutrition preparations by four meals every day(08:00,12:00 18:00,22:00), each meal are pumped within 60min or 120min through stomach tube.Feeding will be started within 24 hours in admission of ICU. The time of therapy is 5 days
Interventions
Daily amount of feeding were continuously pumped for 24 hours. EN preparation pumping scheme was as follows: The initial pumping speed was average pumping volume of total enteral nutrition in one day, and gastric residual volumes is checked every 4 hours. If it is not tolerable, the speed of the pumping is reduced by half on the original speed. GRV\<200mL were considered markers of good tolerance.Feeding intolerance was defined as GRV\>200 mL. If GRV\>500mL, EN was stopped and reassessed after 4 hours.
Daily amount of feeding were continuously pumped for 16 hours.EN preparation pumping scheme was as follows: The initial pumping speed was average pumping volume of total enteral nutrition in one day, and gastric residual volumes is checked every 4 hours.If it is not tolerable, the speed of the pumping is reduced by half on the original speed. GRV\<200 mL were considered markers of good tolerance. Feeding intolerance was defined as GRV\>200 mL. If GRV\>500mL, EN was stopped and reassessed after 4 hours.
Daily amount of feeding were divided into four meals, each meal are pumped within 60mins or 120mins through stomach tube. EN preparation pumping scheme was as follows: If the volume of each meal is less than or equal to 250ml(≤250ml), pump in within 60min, if volume is greater than 250ml(\>250ml), pump in within 120min and gastric residual volumes is checked before each intermittent feeding. If it can be tolerated, the velocity of the pumping can be increased by half of the original speed.If it is not tolerable, the speed of the pumping is reduced by half on the original speed. GRV\<200 mL were considered markers of good tolerance. Feeding intolerance was defined as GRV\>200 mL. If GRV\>500mL, EN was stopped and reassessed after 4 hours.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Septic patients in Department of Critical Care Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine;
- APACHE-Ⅱ score greater than 15 points;
- Signing the informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Fasting patients in the clinical, such as digestive tract perforation, bleeding or postoperative patients with gastrointestinal tract;
- Allergic to enteral nutrition preparations;
- Don't want to attend the test or not with the healer.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
2nd Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510000, China
Related Publications (4)
Lagu T, Rothberg MB, Shieh MS, Pekow PS, Steingrub JS, Lindenauer PK. Hospitalizations, costs, and outcomes of severe sepsis in the United States 2003 to 2007. Crit Care Med. 2012 Mar;40(3):754-61. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318232db65.
PMID: 21963582RESULTNieuwenhuijzen GA, Deitch EA, Goris RJ. The relationship between gut-derived bacteria and the development of the multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. J Anat. 1996 Dec;189 ( Pt 3)(Pt 3):537-48.
PMID: 8982828RESULTPastores SM, Katz DP, Kvetan V. Splanchnic ischemia and gut mucosal injury in sepsis and the multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Am J Gastroenterol. 1996 Sep;91(9):1697-710.
PMID: 8792684RESULTYang G, Deng A, Zheng B, Li J, Yu Y, Ouyang H, Huang X, Chen H. Effect of different feeding methods on gastrointestinal function in critical patients (DFM-GFC): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2022 Oct 20;23(1):882. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06807-7.
PMID: 36266668DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 8, 2020
First Posted
January 13, 2020
Study Start
July 1, 2020
Primary Completion
December 31, 2024
Study Completion
June 30, 2025
Last Updated
March 5, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share