Cannabis Edibles Packaging Imagery Experiment
The Impact of Cannabis Edibles Packaging Descriptors on Consumer Appeal, Harm Perceptions and Willingness to Try: Packaging Imagery Experiment
2 other identifiers
interventional
1,260
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess differences in perceptions of product appeal, harm, and subsequent willingness to try cannabis edibles products with/without packaging imagery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 5, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 10, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 23, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 19, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 19, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 8, 2025
CompletedJune 8, 2025
March 1, 2025
27 days
April 5, 2024
May 2, 2025
June 5, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Product Appeal Scoring
One item to assess the appeal of the product. Results will be reported as mean for all products within condition. Question: How appealing is this product to you? Response options: (0) Not at all appealing to (10) Very appealing
After exposure to product packaging - up to 1 min
Package Appeal Scoring
One item to assess appeal of the packaging of the product. Results will be reported as mean for all products within condition. Question: How appealing is this packaging to you? Response options: (0) Not at all appealing to (10) Very appealing
After exposure to product packaging - up to 1 min
Product Harm Perceptions (Absolute) Scoring
After exposure to product packaging; 1 min One item to assess participants' opinions of safety of the product. Results will be reported as the number of each type of response. Question: How safe do you think it would be to eat the edible in this package? Response options: (1) Completely unsafe, (2) Somewhat unsafe, (3) Somewhat safe, (4) Completely safe
After exposure to product packaging - up to 1 min
Package Harm Perceptions (Absolute) Scoring
One item to assess participants' opinions of product safety based on the packaging. Results will be reported as the number of each type of response. Question: How much does this packaging make you think this edible is safe to consume? Response options: (1) Not at all; (2) A little; (3) Somewhat; (4) A lot
After exposure to product packaging - up to 1 min
Willingness to Try Free Sample Scoring
One question will assess the participant's willingness to try the product shown. Results will be reported as the number of each type of response. Question: How interested would you be in a free sample of this product? Response options: (1) Not at all; (2) Slightly; (3) Somewhat; (4) Moderately; (5) Very
After exposure to product packaging - up to 1 min
Willingness to Try Product Scoring
One item to assess the participants' willingness to try the product based on the packaging. Results will be reported as the number of each type of response. Question: How much does seeing this packaging make you want to try this edible? Response options: (1) Not at all; (2) A little; (3) Somewhat; (4) A lot
After exposure to product packaging - up to 1 min
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Appeal to Children Scoring
After exposure to product packaging - up to 1 min
Harm Perceptions (Relative) Scoring
After exposure to product packaging - up to 1 min
Other Outcomes (3)
Perception of Quality Scoring
After exposure to product packaging - up to 1 min
Perception of Good Taste Scoring
After exposure to product packaging - up to 1 min
Perception of Healthfulness of Product Scoring
After exposure to product packaging - up to 1 min
Study Arms (5)
Flavor Imagery
EXPERIMENTALFour edible product packages (gummies, chocolate, mints, cookies) with package imagery in a flavor theme.
Animal Imagery
EXPERIMENTALFour edible product packages (gummies, chocolate, mints, cookies) with package imagery in an animal theme.
Nature Imagery
EXPERIMENTALFour edible product packages (gummies, chocolate, mints, cookies) with package imagery in a nature theme.
Medical Imagery
EXPERIMENTALFour edible product packages (gummies, chocolate, mints, cookies) with package imagery in a medical theme.
No Imagery (Control)
EXPERIMENTALFour edible product packages (gummies, chocolate, mints, cookies) without any added packaging imagery.
Interventions
Participants in the four intervention conditions will be shown four cannabis edibles packages that have been altered to contain one of the imagery themes. All participants will see the same four products, and each condition will see the products with the same imagery theme.
Participants in the control condition will see the same four product packages, but without any added imagery.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- US resident
- Aged 18-65, inclusive
- Up to 13% of participants will be those who identify as Black/African American
- Up to 16% of participants will be those who identify as Hispanic
- Approximately 50% of participants will be past year cannabis users
- Was not a participant on the anteceding experiment, Cannabis Edibles Packaging Descriptors Experiment
You may not qualify if:
- Does not currently reside in the United States
- Younger than 18 or older than 65
- Does not provide information regarding history of cannabis use
- Otherwise eligible but demographic and/or user group quotas have been met
- Was a participant on the anteceding experiment, Cannabis Edibles Packaging Descriptors Experiment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, United States
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Beth Reboussin, PhD
- Organization
- Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Beth Reboussin, PhD
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 5, 2024
First Posted
April 10, 2024
Study Start
May 23, 2024
Primary Completion
June 19, 2024
Study Completion
June 19, 2024
Last Updated
June 8, 2025
Results First Posted
June 8, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share