Empathy Training for Psychology Students Trainees
Effectiveness of Empathy Training Among Psychology Students Trainees: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to examine the effectiveness of empathy training for psychology student trainees who plan to become mental health practitioners. The training consists of five sessions of psychoeducation, three-role group exercises, and Q\&A. Empathy assessment will be based on self-reported, listener-reported, and observer-reported measurements.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 21, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 8, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 20, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2024
CompletedMay 10, 2024
May 1, 2024
1 month
March 21, 2024
May 8, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Change from counseling duration
A 10-minute counseling simulation will be conducted for each participant. The simulation will last 10 minutes or before 10 minutes if the participant gives up midway. The duration time will be recorded to measure the counseling tolerance of the participants. Longer duration indicates better counseling tolerance.
Through study completion, an average of 3 month
Change from Baseline of 12-Item Version of the Barrett-Lennard Relationship Inventory
A 12-item empathy self-report, senior-psychological-counselor-report, and simulate-client-report scale measures regard (R), empathic understanding (E), congruence (C), and unconditionality of regard (U) of the therapist. The scoring of each item is from -3 to +3 (12 items, total score varies from -36 to 36). A higher score represents better facilitative conditions the therapist can shape.
Through study completion, an average of 3 month
Change from consultation willingness question inquiry
A single item inquiry "How willing are you to come back for consultation next time?" will be asked to the simulation "client" to measure the ability to build the counselor-client relationship. The item scores from 0 to 4. A higher score represents a higher ability to build the counselor-client relationship.
Through study completion, an average of 3 month
Change from morphed emotion perception task
An experimental task measures the ability of emotion perception. Participants need to identify the emotion of facial pictures out of six basic emotions (i.e., anger, sadness, fear, disgust, surprise, and happiness). The higher accuracy indicates better emotion perception ability.
Through study completion, an average of 3 month
Change from Baseline of the Measure of Empathy Scale
An 8-item empathy self-report scale measures cognitive empathy and emotional empathy on a 5-point Likert scale (score from 1 to 5, and total score vary from 8 to 40). A higher score represents higher empathy ability.
Through study completion, an average of 3 month
Change from Baseline of the Emotion Perception Scale
A 13-item emotion perception scale measures the extent of emotions within a month, including anger, happiness, sadness, fear, surprise, disgust, guilt, shame, pressure, depression, inner anger, numbness, and aggrievedness. Each item scores from 0 to 5, with total score varying from 0 to 65. A higher score represents a higher extent of feeling the emotions.
1 month
Change from Baseline of the Peking Alexithymia Scale
A 23-item Peking alexithymia scale measures the ability and willingness to feel, recognize, and share emotions on a 5-point Likert scale (scores from 1 to 5, and total scores vary from 23 to 115). A higher score represents more severe alexithymia.
1 month
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Change from Baseline of the Patient Health Questionnaire
2 weeks
Change from Baseline of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale
2 weeks
Change from Baseline of the Peking Irritability Scale
1 month
Change from Baseline of the the Fatigue Assessment Scale
Through study completion, an average of 3 month
Change from Baseline of the the Patient Health Questionnaire
4 weeks
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Empathy Training
EXPERIMENTALThe Empathy training consists of five sessions. Each session contains psychoeducation, three-role group exercises, and Q\&A. The interval between every session is 5-14 days. Sessions are scheduled for 1.5 hours, including 30 minutes of psychoeducation, 45 minutes of three-role group exercises, and 15 minutes of Q\&A.
Wait-List
NO INTERVENTIONThe participants in the wait-list group will not receive the empathy training or other similar training until all the groups finish their one-month follow-up measurements.
Interventions
The intervention contains five themes: 1) An overview of empathy and emotions. 2) Cognitive empathy and clarification technique. 3) Emotional empathy and reflection of feelings technique. 4) Awaring and dealing with the inner feelings while empathizing. 5) Empathy timing and "emotional pendulum" technique.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult male and female (aged between 18 and 65 years old)
- Major or double major in psychology
- Currently enrolled undergraduate or graduate students
- Taking psychological counselor as one of the major occupational chooses
You may not qualify if:
- Hearing, speech, reading, or writing impairments
- A diagnosis of mental disorders
- Simultaneously participating in other emotional skills training
- Suicidal ideation or self-injurious behavior
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Peking University
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100871, China
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yinyin Zang, PhD
Study Principal Investigator Peking University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 21, 2024
First Posted
April 8, 2024
Study Start
May 20, 2024
Primary Completion
June 30, 2024
Study Completion
December 30, 2024
Last Updated
May 10, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-05