Assessment of the Effectiveness of TA Versus LEEP for Cervical Cancer Risk Reduction in WLHIV in Mozambique
A Randomized Clinical Trial to Assess the Effectiveness of Thermal Ablation Versus Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure for Cervical Cancer Risk Reduction in Women Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus in Mozambique
1 other identifier
interventional
4,844
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Given that WLWH are more likely to develop persistent HPV infection and CC, effective screening and the management and treatment of pre-cancerous cervical abnormalities is critical to decrease the global burden of cervical cancer. The vast majority of WLWH live in SSA, where resources are more constrained. Therefore, simple, affordable, and effective tools are needed for the prevention of cervical cancer in SSA. In this setting, the best method for treatment of screen-positive WLWH has not been determined. The proposed study will compare the effectiveness of TA vs. LEEP, for treating precursor lesions (CIN 2/3) and HPV infection in WLWH, identify the determinants of treatment failure, and develop a strategy to predict patients in whom treatment is likely to fail so that alternative treatments can be provided. Moreover, local evidence of the optimal method of treatments is necessary to inform health policy and promote adherence.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable hiv-infections
Started Apr 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable hiv-infections
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 27, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 22, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 17, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2027
May 22, 2024
May 1, 2024
3.4 years
February 27, 2024
May 21, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Comparison of treatment success rates for biopsy-confirmed CIN 2/3: Thermoablation (TA) vs. Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure (LEEP)
The treatment success rate (12-month efficacy) of LEEP (pL) and that of ablation (pA) for participants with ablation-eligible CIN 2/3 will be measured by assessing the proportion of patients in each treatment group whose lesions completely regress or are successfully treated without recurrence over a defined follow-up period.
12 months
Study Arms (2)
Thermo ablation treatment
OTHERParticipants allocated in this group will be treated with thermo ablation. Before TA, perform biopsies of any acetowhite lesions by colposcopy and/or positive by AVE and an endocervical curettage (ECC); In women who do not have any lesions noted by colposcopy or AVE, one random cervical biopsy at the squamocolumnar junction and an endocervical curettage (ECC) will be obtained. TA is performed during the same exam (immediately following biopsies/ECC)TA will be done according to the manufacturer's instructions and specifications.
LEEP treatment
OTHERParticipants allocated in this group will be treated with LEEP. LEEP will be done according to standard procedure. No biopsies are taken, only LEEP is performed, unless clinically indicated.
Interventions
Thermal ablative uses heat (100°C to 120°C) to cause localized tissue damage at the cervical transformation zone and destroy the abnormal epithelium.
Cervical tissue excision
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ages 25-49 years;
- confirmed HIV infection;
- physically and mentally willing and able to participate in the study, and provide informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- currently pregnant or \<6 weeks post-partum;
- had a hysterectomy and no longer have a cervix;
- a history of cervical cancer or treatment for cervical abnormalities; and
- any medical, psychiatric, or other condition that would interfere with protocol adherence, assessment of safety, and/or ability/competence to provide informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
INSMozambique
Maputo, Mozambique
Related Publications (1)
Fallah PN, Salcedo MP, Nhacule E, Utui Y, Massinga MM, Osman NB, Tivir GG, Carrilho C, Monteiro E, Rangeiro R, Neves A, Changule D, Mariano A, Machaze A, Castiano CE, Baker E, Jeronimo J, Chiao EY, Munsell MF, Varon ML, Milan J, Thomas JP, Richards-Kortum R, Lorenzoni C, Omar Viegas EN, Castle PE, Schmeler KM. A randomized clinical trial to assess the effectiveness of thermal ablation versus loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical cancer risk reduction in women living with HIV in Mozambique. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2025 Apr 26:101905. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101905. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 40399211DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Edna Viegas, MD, PhD
Instituto Nacional de Saúde, Mozambique
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 27, 2024
First Posted
March 22, 2024
Study Start
April 17, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2027
Last Updated
May 22, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-05