Decision Support on End-of-life Care Planning in Older Adults
"Effects of a Decision Support Intervention on End-of-life Care Planning in Chinese Older Adults With Advanced Disease and Their Family Members: A Feasibility Trial"
1 other identifier
interventional
60
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This study aims to test the effects of a patient decision aid (PDA) on planning for end-of-life (EOL) care among older adults with COPD. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- 1.Does a PDA improve the process of a person to make decisions on EOL care?
- 2.Does a PDA improve the readiness of a person to join advance care planning (ACP) communication?
- 3.Does a person make an advance directive after using a PDA?
- 4.Be randomly assigned to one of two groups.
- 5.In the experimental group, participants will receive two 60-minute interactive consultations over four weeks, using a PDA to help clarify values and preferences for future medical care. A guidebook summarising these future care options will be provided.
- 6.In the control group, participants will receive two 60-minute sessions on lifestyle modification and self-care management over four weeks using a guidebook with coaching. A guidebook summarising general health information will be provided.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable chronic-obstructive-pulmonary-disease
Started Mar 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable chronic-obstructive-pulmonary-disease
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 3, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 10, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 15, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 31, 2025
CompletedMarch 18, 2024
March 1, 2024
10 months
March 3, 2024
March 15, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Patients' decisional conflict regarding EOL care
It will be measured using the SURE test to reflect the quality of the decision-making process. This test is derived from the Decisional Conflict Scale. It contains four items that measure uncertainty, inadequate knowledge, unclear values and inadequate support and resources. It is corresponding to the conceptual framework of this study. The response format will be dichotomous (0 = no, 1 = yes), with a higher score indicating a higher level of decisional conflict.
Before intervention, after intervention and 3-month followup.
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Patients' confidence level regarding three ACP actions - namely, appointing a surrogate and discussing EOL care with a surrogate and medical doctors.
Before intervention, after intervention and 3-month followup.
Patients' readiness for ACP
Before intervention, after intervention and 3-month followup.
Participant's completion of an Advance Directive (AD)
Before intervention, 3-month followup
Participants' understanding of the PDA
After intervention and 3-month followup.
Participant's subjective clarity of content, comfort during reading and viewing, and the usefulness of the information of the PDA.
After intervention and 3-month followup.
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Experimental Group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in experimental group will receive a COPD Decision Support Tool (PDA intervention).
Attention Control Placebo Group
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants in the attention control placebo group will receive a general health coaching intervention. Dose and time similar to experimental group.
Interventions
Participants in this group will receive two 60-minute intervention sessions in one month. The COPD PDA consists of three main parts: The first component, clinical counselling, guides the participants in reviewing the common EOL scenarios. The second component, an evidence-based decision aid, is presented as an option grid in a booklet and a video to provide information about outcome probabilities of various treatment options and survival estimates in a balanced and unbiased manner. The information is presented in plain language for laypersons. The third component, decision coaching, introduces the concept of ACP and guides deliberation through value clarification.
The participants in the control group will receive two 60-minute health coaching sessions developed by the PI for another project as an attention placebo control. Trained research personnel will use the same amount of interaction time and similar formats to avoid threats to the study's internal validity. This intervention will focus on lifestyle modification and self-care management unrelated to the tested intervention content or outcomes. The trained research personnel will give the guidebook consisting of general self-management advice to participants in this group.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 50 years (inclusive) or older.
- Diagnosed with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) by a physician.
- Normal cognitive function.
- Ability to communicate in Mandarin or Cantonese.
- Willingness to participate in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (18)
MacPherson A, Walshe C, O'Donnell V, Vyas A. The views of patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on advance care planning: a qualitative study. Palliat Med. 2013 Mar;27(3):265-72. doi: 10.1177/0269216312440606. Epub 2012 Mar 26.
PMID: 22450158BACKGROUNDSapey E, Stockley RA. COPD exacerbations . 2: aetiology. Thorax. 2006 Mar;61(3):250-8. doi: 10.1136/thx.2005.041822.
PMID: 16517585BACKGROUNDMomen N, Hadfield P, Kuhn I, Smith E, Barclay S. Discussing an uncertain future: end-of-life care conversations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A systematic literature review and narrative synthesis. Thorax. 2012 Sep;67(9):777-80. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-201835. Epub 2012 Jul 16.
PMID: 22802331BACKGROUNDRietjens JAC, Sudore RL, Connolly M, van Delden JJ, Drickamer MA, Droger M, van der Heide A, Heyland DK, Houttekier D, Janssen DJA, Orsi L, Payne S, Seymour J, Jox RJ, Korfage IJ; European Association for Palliative Care. Definition and recommendations for advance care planning: an international consensus supported by the European Association for Palliative Care. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Sep;18(9):e543-e551. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30582-X.
PMID: 28884703BACKGROUNDChan HY, Ng JS, Chan KS, Ko PS, Leung DY, Chan CW, Chan LN, Lee IF, Lee DT. Effects of a nurse-led post-discharge advance care planning programme for community-dwelling patients nearing the end of life and their family members: A randomised controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Nov;87:26-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.07.008. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
PMID: 30048916BACKGROUNDCheng HB, Shek PK, Man CW, Chan OM, Chan CH, Lai KM, Cheng SC, Fung KS, Lui WK, Lam C, Ng YK, Wong WT, Wong C. Dealing With Death Taboo: Discussion of Do-Not-Resuscitate Directives With Chinese Patients With Noncancer Life-Limiting Illnesses. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2019 Sep;36(9):760-766. doi: 10.1177/1049909119828116. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
PMID: 30744386BACKGROUNDBravo G, Trottier L, Arcand M, Boire-Lavigne AM, Blanchette D, Dubois MF, Guay M, Lane J, Hottin P, Bellemare S. Promoting advance care planning among community-based older adults: A randomized controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Nov;99(11):1785-1795. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.05.009. Epub 2016 May 12.
PMID: 27283764BACKGROUNDCohen SM, Volandes AE, Shaffer ML, Hanson LC, Habtemariam D, Mitchell SL. Concordance Between Proxy Level of Care Preference and Advance Directives Among Nursing Home Residents With Advanced Dementia: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Jan;57(1):37-46.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.09.018. Epub 2018 Sep 29.
PMID: 30273717BACKGROUNDMichael NG, Georgousopoulou E, Hepworth G, Melia A, Tuohy R, Sulistio M, Kissane D. Patient-caregiver dyads advance care plan value discussions: randomised controlled cancer trial of video decision support tool. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2022 Jan 25:bmjspcare-2021-003240. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003240. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 35078875BACKGROUNDKim S, Koh S, Park K, Kim J. End-of-life care decisions using a Korean advance directive among cancer patient-caregiver dyads. Palliat Support Care. 2017 Feb;15(1):77-87. doi: 10.1017/S1478951516000808. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
PMID: 27804916BACKGROUNDWen FH, Chen JS, Chou WC, Chang WC, Hsieh CH, Tang ST. Extent and Determinants of Terminally Ill Cancer Patients' Concordance Between Preferred and Received Life-Sustaining Treatment States: An Advance Care Planning Randomized Trial in Taiwan. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Jul;58(1):1-10.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.04.010. Epub 2019 Apr 18.
PMID: 31004770BACKGROUNDCardona-Morrell M, Benfatti-Olivato G, Jansen J, Turner RM, Fajardo-Pulido D, Hillman K. A systematic review of effectiveness of decision aids to assist older patients at the end of life. Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Mar;100(3):425-435. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.10.007. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
PMID: 27765378BACKGROUNDElwyn G, O'Connor A, Stacey D, Volk R, Edwards A, Coulter A, Thomson R, Barratt A, Barry M, Bernstein S, Butow P, Clarke A, Entwistle V, Feldman-Stewart D, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Moumjid N, Mulley A, Ruland C, Sepucha K, Sykes A, Whelan T; International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ. 2006 Aug 26;333(7565):417. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38926.629329.AE. Epub 2006 Aug 14.
PMID: 16908462BACKGROUNDStacey D, Legare F, Lewis K, Barry MJ, Bennett CL, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Lyddiatt A, Thomson R, Trevena L. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4(4):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5.
PMID: 28402085BACKGROUNDBell ML, Whitehead AL, Julious SA. Guidance for using pilot studies to inform the design of intervention trials with continuous outcomes. Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Jan 18;10:153-157. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S146397. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 29403314BACKGROUNDJulious SA. Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study. Pharmaceutical Statistics: The Journal of Applied Statistics in the Pharmaceutical Industry. 2005;4(4):287-91.
BACKGROUNDBarbetta C, Allgar V, Maddocks M, Ribeiro C, Wilcock A, Currow DC, Phillips J, Johnson MJ. Australia-modified Karnofsky Performance Scale and physical activity in COPD and lung cancer: an exploratory pooled data analysis. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2022 Dec;12(e6):e759-e762. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-001869. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
PMID: 31296518BACKGROUNDLiu L, Zhao YY, Zhang LH, Chan HY. Measuring Self-Efficacy and Readiness for Advance Care Planning in Chinese Older Adults. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Sep;60(3):622-629. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.06.013. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
PMID: 32574659BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jenny Lai, DN
National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Participants will be blinded to their group assignment. The personnel administering the interventions will not be blinded
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 3, 2024
First Posted
March 15, 2024
Study Start
March 10, 2024
Primary Completion
December 31, 2024
Study Completion
January 31, 2025
Last Updated
March 18, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Data will not be shared to other researchers.