Effect of Oral Feeding on Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
1 other identifier
interventional
80
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This is a prospective, randomized controlled clinical trail that involved patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the clinical effect of Oral Tubes vs Nasogastric Tubes in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. The main questions it aims to answer are: Compared to Nasogastric Tube Feeding, can the Oral esophageal Tube Feeding better improve the nutritional status and pulmonary infection
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable chronic-obstructive-pulmonary-disease
Started Jul 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable chronic-obstructive-pulmonary-disease
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 11, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 17, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2025
CompletedJuly 17, 2024
July 1, 2024
11 months
July 11, 2024
July 11, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test
It is a simple questionnaire used to assess symptoms and quality of life in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). The scale consists of 8 items covering the most common symptoms and impacts on quality of life in COPD patients, such as cough, sputum production, and breathlessness. Each item is graded on a scale of 0 to 5, where patients select the score that best reflects their experience. The total score ranges from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.
day 1 and day 15
Study Arms (2)
Oral Tube Feeding+Basic treatment
EXPERIMENTALThe patients were provided with 1) basic treatment including intracranial pressure reduction, anti-infection therapy, blood pressure and blood glucose control. For the observation group, the nasogastric tube was removed, and Intermittent oro-esophageal tube feeding was initiated for nutrition support within 4 hours after completing the admission assessment, following the standard Intermittent oro-esophageal tube feeding procedure.
Nasogastric Tube Feeding+Basic treatment
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe patients were provided with 1) basic treatment including intracranial pressure reduction, anti-infection therapy, blood pressure and blood glucose control. Patients in the control group were provided with nutrition support by the indwelling nasogastric tube. The entire feeding process strictly followed the standardized procedure for nasogastric feeding.
Interventions
including anti-infection therapy, blood pressure and blood glucose control
Before each feeding, inside and outside of the tube was cleaned with water. During feeding, the patient should maintain a semi-reclining or sitting position with mouth opened, and the tube was inserted slowly and smoothly into the upper part of the esophagus by medical staffs while the appropriate depth of intubation was checked with the calibration markings on the tube wall. The distance from the incisors to the head part of the tube should be between 22-25 cm. However, the specific depth should be evaluated based on patients' feedback and adjusted accordingly. After insertion, the tail part of the tube should be put into a container full of water and the absence of continuous bubbles indicated a successful intubation. Then, the feeding was to be conducted three times per day with 50 ml per minute and 400-600ml for each feeding.
The feeding was conducted once every 3-4 hours, with 200-300ml each time. The total feeding volume was determined based on daily requirements. The feeding content was formulated by the nutritionists based on the patient\'s condition and relevant guidelines to reach the energy demand as 20-25 kcal/kg/day and protein supplementation of 1.2-2.0 g/kg/day for both two groups. For patients with limited tube feeding compliance, we made appropriate adjustments to ensure that they were not at risk of severe malnutrition as much as possible.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- A diagnosis of COPD confirmed by spirometry
- ≥18 years of age
- Written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Known hypersensitivity to metoprolol or related derivatives
- Sinus bradycardia (resting heart rate \< 50/min)
- Sick sinus syndrome unless treated with a pacemaker
- Atrial fibrillation/flutter
- Clinical signs or previous diagnosis of heart failure, angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular disease, or critical peripheral ischemia
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- The Research Director
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 11, 2024
First Posted
July 17, 2024
Study Start
July 1, 2024
Primary Completion
June 1, 2025
Study Completion
June 1, 2025
Last Updated
July 17, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-07