The STRENGTHEN Study
Hybrid Interventions to Optimize Neural Plasticity and Enhance Well-being: Mental Exercise, and Transcranial Electrical Stimulation With Temporal Interference: The STRENGTHEN Study - Phase 1 and 2
5 other identifiers
interventional
64
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study uses two different types of interventions including electrical brain stimulation delivered during sleep, and brief, daily meditation training. The investigators are trying to figure out whether these techniques, either alone or in combination with each other, can positively impact the brain networks that support our ability to think flexibly and to regulate our emotions. 48 participants will be enrolled into each of 2 phases and can expect to be on study for up to 9 months.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 12, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 20, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 6, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 24, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 24, 2026
CompletedApril 29, 2026
April 1, 2026
2.1 years
February 12, 2024
April 23, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (39)
Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Score
The PHQ-9 is a 9-item inventory asking participants to rate from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly everyday) the frequency and intensity of depressive symptoms experienced by the respondent over the preceding two-week period. Scores range from 0 to 27 where higher scores indicate poorer patient health. Participants with scores greater than 15 will be excluded from study.
baseline, visit 3 (week 1), visit 4 (week 1), visit 5 (week 2), visit 6 (week 2), visit 7 (week 3), visit 8 (week 3), visit 9 (week 4), visit 10 (week 4), post-intervention (week 5), follow-up (week 20)
Change in General Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) Score
This 7-item inventory measures the severity of generalized anxiety disorder symptoms in individuals by asking participants to rate from 0 (not all at) to 3 (nearly everyday) the frequency and intensity of various anxiety-related symptoms experienced by the participant in the past two weeks. Scores range from 0-21 where higher scores indicate more anxiety. This study will exclude any participants who have a total score of 15 or above.
baseline, visit 3 (week 1), visit 4 (week 1), visit 5 (week 2), visit 6 (week 2), visit 7 (week 3), visit 8 (week 3), visit 9 (week 4), visit 10 (week 4), post-intervention (week 5), follow-up (week 20)
Change in Single-item Suicide Question
This single-item suicide question assesses participant's suicidal ideation to respond yes or no to "Since the last time we saw you, did you seriously consider attempting suicide?".
baseline, visit 3 (week 1), visit 4 (week 1), visit 5 (week 2), visit 6 (week 2), visit 7 (week 3), visit 8 (week 3), visit 9 (week 4), visit 10 (week 4), post-intervention (week 5), follow-up (week 20)
Change in Healthy Minds Index (HM Index)
The HM Index is a 17-question, 5-point scale well-being assessment that measures the four pillars of Wellbeing - Awareness, Connection, Insight, and Purpose. Means scores are from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicative of increased wellbeing.
baseline, post-intervention (week 5), follow-up (week 20)
Change in the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) Score
This is a 10-item inventory asking participants to rate from 0 (never) to 4 (very often) the frequency with which they have felt various kinds of stress in the last month. Scores range from 0 to 40 with higher score indicative of higher stress.
baseline, post-intervention (week 5), follow-up (week 20)
Change in Emotional Styles Questionnaire (ESQ) Score
This is a 24-item inventory asking participants to rate from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). Scores range from 24 - 168, higher scores are indicative of less Healthy Emotionality
baseline, post-intervention (week 5), follow-up (week 20)
Change in Cognitive Flexibility Inventory (CFI) Score: Alternatives Subscale
The CFI is a 20-item self-report measure to monitor how often individuals engage in cognitive behavioral thought challenging interventions. Participants rate each item from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). Scores range from 13 - 91, higher scores are indicative of increased ability to perceive multiple alternative explanations.
baseline, post-intervention (week 5), follow-up (week 20)
Change in Cognitive Flexibility Inventory (CFI) Score: Control Subscale
The CFI is a 20-item self-report measure to monitor how often individuals engage in cognitive behavioral thought challenging interventions. Participants rate each item from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). Scores range from 7 - 49, higher scores are indicative of increased ability to perceive difficult situations as controllable.
baseline, post-intervention (week 5), follow-up (week 20)
Change in Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale-18 (DERS-18) Score
The DERS-18 is a 18-item self-report measure which assesses various aspects of emotion regulation, including emotional awareness, acceptance of emotional responses, impulse control, and effective goal-directed behavior during emotional experiences using a 5-point scale from 1 (almost never) to 5 (almost always). Higher scores suggest greater problems with emotion regulation.
baseline, post-intervention (week 5), follow-up (week 20)
Change in PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Score
This validated assessment tool asks participants to rate 8 items that measure sleep-related difficulties using a 5-point Likert scale. Scores range from 8 to 40 with higher scores indicative of more sleep disturbance.
baseline, post-intervention (week 5), follow-up (week 20)
Change in PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5)
This 20-item self-report questionnaire is a widely used self-report questionnaire which assesses symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Participants rate from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely) the severity of their symptoms. Scores range from 0 to 80 with higher scores indicative of more severe PTSD symptoms.
baseline, post-intervention (week 5), follow-up (week 20)
Change in World Health Organization-5 (WHO-5)
This 5-item scale is a global measure of Well-Being, where higher scores reflect greater overall wellbeing (range 0-25).
baseline, post-intervention (week 5), follow-up (week 20)
Change in Restorative Sleep Questionnaire (RSQ) Score
This validated assessment measuring subjective perceptions of the restorative or inadequate properties of sleep will be given the morning after every sleep lab visit. The questionnaire includes 9 items rated on a 5 point scale given at the time of awakening. Scores range from 0 to100, where higher scores are indicative of better restorative sleep.
baseline, visit 3 (week 1), visit 4 (week 1), visit 5 (week 2), visit 6 (week 2), visit 7 (week 3), visit 8 (week 3), visit 9 (week 4), visit 10 (week 4)
Change in Sleep Depth Question (SDQ) Score
Participants will be asked to rate the depth of their prior night's sleep using 5-point Likert-type scale. How deep was your sleep? from 1 (light) to 5 (deep) after every sleep laboratory visit.
baseline, visit 3 (week 1), visit 4 (week 1), visit 5 (week 2), visit 6 (week 2), visit 7 (week 3), visit 8 (week 3), visit 9 (week 4), visit 10 (week 4)
Change in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Score
This validated questionnaire evaluates subjective sleep quality. Each of the questionnaire's 19 self-reported items belongs to one of seven subcategories: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction. Five additional questions rated by the respondent's roommate or bed partner are included for clinical purposes and are not scored. Each component is scored 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (severe difficulty), scores ranging from 0 to 21. Higher scores are indicative of worse sleep quality.
baseline, post-intervention (week 5)
Change in Suicide Risk Survey
This battery assesses known suicide risk factors. The 13 items ask participants about their sociodemographic characteristics; past experiences with mental health symptoms; thoughts of self-harm, and self-harming actions; psychological traits. Scores range from \< 0.39408955691660219 to \>= 0.67215170692043313 with higher scores indicative of increased suicidality.
baseline, post-intervention (week 5)
Change in Brief Suicide Cognitions Scale (B-SCS) Score
This self-report measure assesses the suicide belief system. Using a 5-point likert scale, participants rate 6 items measuring their enduring or identity-based hopelessness rooted in their beliefs about being undesirable, their emotional state as intolerable, and life challenges as insurmountable. Scores range from 6 to 30 where higher scores are indicative of increased suicidality.
baseline, post-intervention (week 5), follow-up (week 20)
Change in Passive and Active Suicidal Ideation Scale (PASIS) Score
This 17-item validated tool assesses participants' passive and active suicidal ideation in the past seven days using a six-point Likert scale, from 0 (Not in the past 7 days) to 5 (several times every day). Higher score reflects greater suicidal ideation.
baseline, post-intervention (week 5), follow-up (week 20)
Change in NIH Toolbox Loneliness Score
The NIH Toolbox Loneliness consists of 5 self-report items assessing participants' feelings of loneliness and social isolation on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1-5 where higher scores indicate increased loneliness.
baseline, visit 3 (week 1), visit 4 (week 1), visit 5 (week 2), visit 6 (week 2), visit 7 (week 3), visit 8 (week 3), visit 9 (week 4), visit 10 (week 4), post-intervention (week 5), follow-up (week 20)
Change in Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) Score
The FFMQ is a widely used self-report inventory that assesses mindfulness across five facets: observing, describing, acting with awareness, non-judging of inner experience, and non-reactivity to inner experience. Participants rate their agreement level with 39 items using a 5-point Likert scale. Scores range from 39 to 195 with higher scores indicative of increased mindfulness.
baseline, visit 3 (week 1), visit 4 (week 1), visit 5 (week 2), visit 6 (week 2), visit 7 (week 3), visit 8 (week 3), visit 9 (week 4), visit 10 (week 4), post-intervention (week 5), follow-up (week 20)
Change in Drexel Defusion Scale (DDS) Score
This self-report measure evaluates the ability to create a mental separation or distance from one's internal experiences by asking participants to rate 10 items assessing defusion across a spectrum of internal thoughts and emotions on a 6-point scale, ranging from 0-5. Total scores range from 0 to 50 with higher scores indicative of increased defusion.
baseline, visit 3 (week 1), visit 4 (week 1), visit 5 (week 2), visit 6 (week 2), visit 7 (week 3), visit 8 (week 3), visit 9 (week 4), visit 10 (week 4), post-intervention (week 5), follow-up (week 20)
Change in PROMIS Meaning and Purpose Score
This is a 37-item inventory asks participants to rate their sense of life with purpose and perceived reasons for living using a 5-point Likert scale. The current study will administer the computer adaptive test (CAT) version of the instrument, in which subsequent item choice of the system will be based on participants' previous responses. Scores range from 37 to 185 with higher scores indicative of higher feelings of meaning and purpose.
baseline, visit 3 (week 1), visit 4 (week 1), visit 5 (week 2), visit 6 (week 2), visit 7 (week 3), visit 8 (week 3), visit 9 (week 4), visit 10 (week 4), post-intervention (week 5), follow-up (week 20)
Change in Digital Working Alliance Inventory (D-WAI) Score
The inventory consists of 6 items which measures the quality of the therapeutic alliance between a user and a digital mental health intervention, which is the HMP in this study. Participants rate their experience using the HMP on a 7-point scale, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). Scores range from 6 to 42 where higher scores indicate better user experience with the app.
post-intervention (week 5), follow-up (week 20)
Change in Perseverative Thinking Questionnaire (PTQ) Score
The PTQ is a self-report instrument assessing repetitive and uncontrolled thinking by asking participants to rate 15 items about the frequency, duration, and perceived uncontrollability of repetitive thoughts on a scale of 0-4. Scores range from 0 to 60. The higher the score, the higher the level of perseverative thinking or repetitive thoughts experienced by the individual.
baseline, post-intervention (week 5), follow-up (week 20)
Change in Experiences Questionnaire's Decentering subscale (EQ-D) Score
This subscale is an 11-item scale of decentering originally developed to assess mechanisms of Mindfulness Based Cognitive Therapy (e.g., "I can separate myself from my thoughts and feelings."). The EQ-D is originally scored on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = never to 5 = all the time) where higher scores indicate increased decentering.
baseline, post-intervention (week 5), follow-up (week 20)
Change in Experience Sampling / Ecological Momentary Assessment
The experience sampling method assesses present moment experience using a short series of questions administered on a smart phone 6 times a day for 7 days. Questions measure current emotional and cognitive state. Score range from 1-5 where higher scores indicate increased emotional state
6 times per day for 7 days
Change in Death Implicit Association Test Score
This task involves participants viewing words on a screen. Words are either related to self (e.g., "I"), others (e.g., "They"), life (e.g., "survive") or death (e.g., "die"). Like other Implicit Association Tests, participants are asked to indicate which category each word belongs to. Across the trials, self and other are paired with either life or death. The measure can be scored as an implicit marker of how easily participants associated death with themselves. Scores are greater than 2 or less than 2, with more positive values indicating a stronger association between self and death.
baseline, post intervention (5 weeks)
Change in Reversal Learning Task Score
This task involves participants viewing and choosing between two abstract visual stimuli (i.e., geometric shapes). After each choice they receive feedback that is either positive (+10) or negative (-10) feedback devoid of monetary value. Stimulus-outcome pairings are reversed over the course of the experiment.
baseline, post intervention (5 weeks)
Change in Multi-Source Interference Task Score
This task involves viewing a series of numbers and letters. Participants are asked to indicate using a button press which number was different from the other numbers. Scores are reported as percentage correct.
baseline, post intervention (5 weeks)
Change in Emotional Stroop Score: Reaction Time
This task involves viewing a series of faces and words. Participants are asked to identify the emotional expression of the faces. Percent change in reaction time is reported.
baseline, post intervention (5 weeks)
Change in Emotional Stroop Score: Percent Correct
This task involves viewing a series of faces and words. Participants are asked to identify the emotional expression of the faces. Percent correct is reported.
baseline, post intervention (5 weeks)
Change in Meteor Mission Score: Mean Reaction Time
This is a mobile measure of attention, based on the Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART), a validated, standardized laboratory task. This task lasts five minutes and measures attention regulation and sustained attention, as assessed based on reaction time, reaction time variability, and accuracy.
baseline, post-intervention (week 5), follow-up (week 20)
Change in Meteor Mission Score: Coefficient of Variation
This is a mobile measure of attention, based on the Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART), a validated, standardized laboratory task. This task lasts five minutes and measures attention regulation and sustained attention, as assessed based on reaction time, reaction time variability, and accuracy.
baseline, post-intervention (week 5), follow-up (week 20)
Change in Meteor Mission Score: Percent Correct
This is a mobile measure of attention, based on the Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART), a validated, standardized laboratory task. This task lasts five minutes and measures attention regulation and sustained attention, as assessed based on reaction time, reaction time variability, and accuracy.
baseline, post-intervention (week 5), follow-up (week 20)
Change in Emotional Persistence Task Score
This task involves viewing pictures categorized as neutral, positive, or negative. Participants may be asked to press a button indicating the valence category of the picture. Positive and negative affect ratings will be made on a continuous sliding scale ranging from 0 to 6.
baseline, post intervention (5 weeks)
Change in Change Your Mind Task Score: Mean Change
This task involves viewing a series of letters and numbers. Participants are asked to determine whether a target letter was a certain letter (e.g., "T"). Participants receive feedback on their choices. The feedback is not always accurate and participants are informed of this. Change range is from 0 to 1.
baseline, post intervention (5 weeks)
Change in Change Your Mind Task Score: Accuracy
This task involves viewing a series of letters and numbers. Participants are asked to determine whether a target letter was a certain letter (e.g., "T"). Participants receive feedback on their choices. The feedback is not always accurate and participants are informed of this. Accuracy is from 0 to 1.
baseline, post intervention (5 weeks)
Change in Change Your Mind Task Score: Response Time
This task involves viewing a series of letters and numbers. Participants are asked to determine whether a target letter was a certain letter (e.g., "T"). Participants receive feedback on their choices. The feedback is not always accurate and participants are informed of this. Response time is reported.
baseline, post intervention (5 weeks)
Psychomotor Vigilance Task (Phase 2 only)
Psychomotor vigilance performance will be measured with the visual psychomotor vigilance task (PVT) a portable, easily usable reaction-time test with a that can yield rapid and reliable assessments of psychomotor vigilance impairment. Participants will take a 3 minute version of the PVT on a tablet or laptop every morning after an in-laboratory sleep visit to assess alertness. Reaction time is reported.
baseline, visit 3 (week 1), visit 4 (week 1), visit 5 (week 2), visit 6 (week 2), visit 7 (week 3), visit 8 (week 3), visit 9 (week 4), visit 10 (week 4)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change in Spectral Power Density During Stimulation-Free Sleep
baseline and up to 8 nights (4 nights for the low frequency group) over the 4 week intervention period following the baseline assessment
Resting-state fMRI Connectivity Z-Scores
baseline, post intervention (5 weeks)
Study Arms (4)
Group 1: Mediation Only (Phase 1 and Phase 2)
EXPERIMENTAL* Baseline measures including imaging * Meditation plus Sham Stimulation 2 nights per week for 4 weeks * Post Intervention (week 5) measures including imaging * Follow up measures (week 20)
Group 2: Stimulation Only (Phase 1 and Phase 2)
EXPERIMENTAL* Baseline measures including imaging * Sham Meditation plus Stimulation in Lab 2 nights per week for 4 weeks * Post Intervention (week 5) measures including imaging * Follow up measures (week 20)
Group 3: Combined, Low Frequency (Phase 1)
EXPERIMENTAL* Baseline measures including imaging * Meditation plus Stimulation in Lab 1 night per week for 4 weeks * Post Intervention (week 5) measures including imaging * Follow up measures (week 20)
Group 4: Combined, High Frequency (Phase 1 and Phase 2)
EXPERIMENTAL* Baseline measures including imaging * Meditation plus Stimulation in Lab 2 nights per week for 4 weeks * Post Intervention (week 5) measures including imaging * Follow up measures (week 20)
Interventions
On two nights each week during the four weeks of the intervention, participants will sleep in the lab and undergo sham TES-TI stimulation for approximately 10 hours per night
Participants will sleep in the lab and undergo active TES-TI stimulation for approximately 10 hours per night.
Imaging protocol will include: structural T1-weighted and T2-weighted images, resting-state functional MRI, task-based functional MRI, and multi-shell diffusion weighted MRI, total scan time will be approximately 2 hours
Participants will follow daily instructions from the Healthy Minds Program at home for four weeks, including guided meditation exercises.
Participants will listen to lessons from the Healthy Minds Program at home for four weeks, which will not include any actual meditation exercises.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Medically healthy
- English-speaking (able to provide consent and complete questionnaires)
- Citizen or legal resident
You may not qualify if:
- Any current or recent history (6 months) of any mental health diagnosis (Examples include major depression, hypomania, psychosis, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder)
- Any current or recent (past 6 months) history of treatment for mental illness (including anti-depressant/anti anxiety medications, therapy)
- Scoring above Moderate range for Anxiety or Depression - Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) greater than or equal to 15 or General Anxiety Disorder (GAD7) greater than or equal to 15
- At risk for suicide (PHQ item 9 greater than 0)
- Any current or past history of neurological disorders or acquired neurological disease (e.g. stroke, traumatic brain injury), including intracranial lesions and obstructive sleep apnea
- History of head trauma resulting in prolonged loss of consciousness; or a history of greater than 3 grade I concussions
- Current history of poorly controlled headaches including intractable or poorly controlled migraines
- Any systemic illness or unstable medical condition that may cause a medical emergency in case of a provoked seizure (cardiac malformation, cardiac dysrhythmia, asthma, etc.)
- History of fainting spells of unknown or undetermined etiology that might constitute seizures
- History of seizures, diagnosis of epilepsy, history of abnormal (epileptiform) electroencephalogram, or family history of treatment resistant epilepsy with the exception of a single seizure of benign etiology (e.g. febrile seizures) in the judgment of a board-certified neurologist
- Possible pregnancy or plan to become pregnant in the next 6 months.
- Any metal in the brain, skull or elsewhere
- Any hair braid, dreadlocks, hair pieces, or extensions which cannot be taken out before the MRI scans and/or sleep stimulation sessions
- Any head coverings or headdress that participant feels uncomfortable removing for the purposes of the MRI scans and/or sleep stimulation sessions
- Any medical devices or implants (i.e. cardiac pacemaker, medication infusion pump, cochlear implant, vagal nerve stimulator) unless otherwise approved by the responsible physician
- +10 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Center for Healthy Minds
Madison, Wisconsin, 53703, United States
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Richard Davidson, PhD
University of Wisconsin, Madison
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Giulio Tononi, MD, PhD
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Participants will not know whether they are in a group receiving active stimulation (groups 2, 3, and 4) or sham stimulation (group 1). However, participants will know whether they are performing meditation (groups 1, 3, and 4) or listening to only the didactic meditation material (group 2), and participants will be aware of how many nights they are undergoing stimulation (1 night per week for group 3, 2 nights per week for groups 1, 2, and 4). Thus, participants will be only partially blind to condition. Investigators will not be blind to condition.
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 12, 2024
First Posted
February 20, 2024
Study Start
March 6, 2024
Primary Completion
April 24, 2026
Study Completion
April 24, 2026
Last Updated
April 29, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Access Criteria
- Data sharing will be available by request and will be granted on an individual basis. In addition, fully de-identified data will be shared for open access purposes.
Data from this study will be kept for an indefinite period. Banked data will be kept in a secure location for use by researchers. The data may be shared with other researchers at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and outside the University. Outside researchers may be at other universities, private companies, or other kinds of organizations. The banked data will be labeled with a code instead of a participant's name. When the data is shared with other investigators for research projects, they will not be able to use the code to figure out which data belongs to a particular subject. The research team will maintain a link between the data and subject identifiable information kept by the study team. This link will not be shared with anyone outside of the study team. Participants will be able to request to have their data removed from the bank by contacting the research team at any time.