Evaluating Implementation and Impact of the Adapted Choose to Move (CTM) Program
CTM
Choose to Move (CTM): Implementation and Impact Evaluation of an Adapted Health-Promoting Program for Equity-Deserving Older Adults
2 other identifiers
interventional
336
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Choose to Move (CTM) is a 3-month, choice-based health-promoting program for low active older adults being scaled-up across British Columbia (BC), Canada. In Phase 5, the goal of CTM is to enhance physical activity, mobility and social connectedness in three target populations: South Asian older adults, older men, and older adults living in Northern BC. To do so, the investigators will support community-based seniors' services (CBSS) organizations through a readiness-building process so they can adapt CTM and deliver the program to these populations. This study has two main research questions:
- 1.How are adapted CTM programs delivered ('implementation outcomes') and what factors influence delivery ('implementation determinants')?
- 2.What is the impact of the adapted CTM programs on health outcomes of older adults?
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 9, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 6, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2027
March 27, 2025
March 1, 2025
2.6 years
February 1, 2024
March 24, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in physical activity
The single item physical activity questionnaire will be used to measure physical activity. Output variable is self-reported number of days/week ≥30 min physical activity in the past week (range 0-7).
0, 3, 15 months
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Change in capacity for mobility
0, 3, 15 months
Change in physical functioning
0, 3, 15 months
Change in loneliness
0, 3, 15 months
Change in social isolation
0, 3, 15 months
Change in social network
0, 3, 15 months
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (20)
Reach-individual
3 months
Reach-regional
0 months
Context - CTM program (interview)
3 months
- +17 more other outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Ethnicity and Culture in Focus
EXPERIMENTALCTM (Phase 5) is a 3-month, flexible, choice-based health-promoting program for low active older adults that can be delivered in-person or online. The program includes: * 1-on-1 Consultation: Participants meet 1-on-1 with their activity coach at the start of the program to set goals and develop a physical activity action plan tailored to their abilities, interests and resources. Older adults can choose to participate in individual or group-based activities. * Group Meetings: Participants will attend eight, 1-hour group-based meetings (max of 15 participants) led by their activity coach. Meetings cover a health-related discussion topic and provide time and space for social connection among participants. Meetings can be held online or in-person. The CTM program will be adapted for South Asian older adults, and may include additional intervention components customized for this population.
Men on the Move
EXPERIMENTALCTM (Phase 5) is a 3-month, flexible, choice-based health-promoting program for low active older adults that can be delivered in-person or online. The program includes: * 1-on-1 Consultation: Participants meet 1-on-1 with their activity coach at the start of the program to set goals and develop a physical activity action plan tailored to their abilities, interests and resources. Older adults can choose to participate in individual or group-based activities. * Group Meetings: Participants will attend eight, 1-hour group-based meetings (max of 15 participants) led by their activity coach. Meetings cover a health-related discussion topic and provide time and space for social connection among participants. Meetings can be held online or in-person. The CTM program will be adapted for older men, and may include additional intervention components customized for this population.
The Forgotten North
EXPERIMENTALCTM (Phase 5) is a 3-month, flexible, choice-based health-promoting program for low active older adults that can be delivered in-person or online. The program includes: * 1-on-1 Consultation: Participants meet 1-on-1 with their activity coach at the start of the program to set goals and develop a physical activity action plan tailored to their abilities, interests and resources. Older adults can choose to participate in individual or group-based activities. * Group Meetings: Participants will attend eight, 1-hour group-based meetings (max of 15 participants) led by their activity coach. Meetings cover a health-related discussion topic and provide time and space for social connection among participants. Meetings can be held online or in-person. The CTM program will be adapted for older adults living in Northern BC, and may include additional intervention components customized for this population.
Interventions
As described under study arm description
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Central support unit staff member;
- Delivery partner organization staff member;
- Activity coach hired by delivery partner organization (activity coaches must speak English to participate in the evaluation);
- English-speaking older adults (aged \>=50 years) who participate in CTM (recruited by delivery partner organizations) will be invited to participate in the evaluation;
- Punjabi-speaking older adults will also be invited to participate in the evaluation if they can read English or Punjabi and/or if the activity coach or a member of the research team has the necessary language skills to ensure effective communication of the Punjabi language translated consent form and surveys.
You may not qualify if:
- non-English speaking delivery partner staff member
- non-English speaking activity coach
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of British Columbialead
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)collaborator
- Active Aging Societycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Active Aging Research Team, Robert H. N. Ho Research Centre
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9, Canada
Related Publications (18)
Curran GM, Bauer M, Mittman B, Pyne JM, Stetler C. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care. 2012 Mar;50(3):217-26. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812.
PMID: 22310560BACKGROUNDMilton K, Bull FC, Bauman A. Reliability and validity testing of a single-item physical activity measure. Br J Sports Med. 2011 Mar;45(3):203-8. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.068395. Epub 2010 May 19.
PMID: 20484314BACKGROUNDHughes ME, Waite LJ, Hawkley LC, Cacioppo JT. A Short Scale for Measuring Loneliness in Large Surveys: Results From Two Population-Based Studies. Res Aging. 2004;26(6):655-672. doi: 10.1177/0164027504268574.
PMID: 18504506BACKGROUNDMacdonald HM, Nettlefold L, Bauman A, Sims-Gould J, McKay HA. Pragmatic Evaluation of Older Adults' Physical Activity in Scale-Up Studies: Is the Single-Item Measure a Reasonable Option? J Aging Phys Act. 2022 Feb 1;30(1):25-32. doi: 10.1123/japa.2020-0412. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
PMID: 34348228BACKGROUNDSimonsick EM, Newman AB, Visser M, Goodpaster B, Kritchevsky SB, Rubin S, Nevitt MC, Harris TB; Health, Aging and Body Composition Study. Mobility limitation in self-described well-functioning older adults: importance of endurance walk testing. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2008 Aug;63(8):841-7. doi: 10.1093/gerona/63.8.841.
PMID: 18772472BACKGROUNDVeroff JB. The dynamics of help-seeking in men and women: a national survey study. Psychiatry. 1981 Aug;44(3):189-200.
PMID: 7267859BACKGROUNDBauer GR, Braimoh J, Scheim AI, Dharma C. Transgender-inclusive measures of sex/gender for population surveys: Mixed-methods evaluation and recommendations. PLoS One. 2017 May 25;12(5):e0178043. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178043. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 28542498BACKGROUNDWare JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83.
PMID: 1593914BACKGROUNDProctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, Bunger A, Griffey R, Hensley M. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Mar;38(2):65-76. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7.
PMID: 20957426BACKGROUNDMcKay H, Naylor PJ, Lau E, Gray SM, Wolfenden L, Milat A, Bauman A, Race D, Nettlefold L, Sims-Gould J. Implementation and scale-up of physical activity and behavioural nutrition interventions: an evaluation roadmap. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Nov 7;16(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0868-4.
PMID: 31699095BACKGROUNDDurlak JA, DuPre EP. Implementation matters: a review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. Am J Community Psychol. 2008 Jun;41(3-4):327-50. doi: 10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0.
PMID: 18322790BACKGROUNDWeiner BJ. A theory of organizational readiness for change. Implement Sci. 2009 Oct 19;4:67. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-67.
PMID: 19840381BACKGROUNDSubedi R, Aitken N, Greenberg L. Canadian Social Environment Typology User Guide. Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada; 2022.
BACKGROUNDScaccia JP, Cook BS, Lamont A, Wandersman A, Castellow J, Katz J, Beidas RS. A practical implementation science heuristic for organizational readiness: R = MC2. J Community Psychol. 2015 Apr;43(4):484-501. doi: 10.1002/jcop.21698. Epub 2015 Apr 13.
PMID: 26668443BACKGROUNDMiller CJ, Barnett ML, Baumann AA, Gutner CA, Wiltsey-Stirman S. The FRAME-IS: a framework for documenting modifications to implementation strategies in healthcare. Implement Sci. 2021 Apr 7;16(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01105-3.
PMID: 33827716BACKGROUNDWiltsey Stirman S, Baumann AA, Miller CJ. The FRAME: an expanded framework for reporting adaptations and modifications to evidence-based interventions. Implement Sci. 2019 Jun 6;14(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0898-y.
PMID: 31171014BACKGROUNDXie F, Pullenayegum E, Gaebel K, Bansback N, Bryan S, Ohinmaa A, Poissant L, Johnson JA; Canadian EQ-5D-5L Valuation Study Group. A Time Trade-off-derived Value Set of the EQ-5D-5L for Canada. Med Care. 2016 Jan;54(1):98-105. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000447.
PMID: 26492214BACKGROUNDHerdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, Bonsel G, Badia X. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x. Epub 2011 Apr 9.
PMID: 21479777BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Heather A McKay, PhD
University of British Columbia
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Joanie Sims Gould, PhD
University of British Columbia
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dawn Mackey, PhD
Simon Fraser University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Farinaz Havaei, RN, PhD
University of British Columbia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 1, 2024
First Posted
February 9, 2024
Study Start
August 6, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
March 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 1, 2027
Last Updated
March 27, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share