NCT06252259

Brief Summary

Choose to Move (CTM) is a 3-month, choice-based health-promoting program for low active older adults being scaled-up across British Columbia (BC), Canada. In Phase 5, the goal of CTM is to enhance physical activity, mobility and social connectedness in three target populations: South Asian older adults, older men, and older adults living in Northern BC. To do so, the investigators will support community-based seniors' services (CBSS) organizations through a readiness-building process so they can adapt CTM and deliver the program to these populations. This study has two main research questions:

  1. 1.How are adapted CTM programs delivered ('implementation outcomes') and what factors influence delivery ('implementation determinants')?
  2. 2.What is the impact of the adapted CTM programs on health outcomes of older adults?

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
336

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
10mo left

Started Aug 2024

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
enrolling by invitation

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress68%
Aug 2024Mar 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 1, 2024

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 9, 2024

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 6, 2024

Completed
2.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2027

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2027

Last Updated

March 27, 2025

Status Verified

March 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2.6 years

First QC Date

February 1, 2024

Last Update Submit

March 24, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Older adultsPhysical activityMobilitySocial isolationLonelinessSocial connectednessBehavior changeImplementationImplementation strategyHealth equityAdaptationReadinessFeasibilityAcceptabilityDoseFidelityEffectiveness

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in physical activity

    The single item physical activity questionnaire will be used to measure physical activity. Output variable is self-reported number of days/week ≥30 min physical activity in the past week (range 0-7).

    0, 3, 15 months

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Change in capacity for mobility

    0, 3, 15 months

  • Change in physical functioning

    0, 3, 15 months

  • Change in loneliness

    0, 3, 15 months

  • Change in social isolation

    0, 3, 15 months

  • Change in social network

    0, 3, 15 months

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (20)

  • Reach-individual

    3 months

  • Reach-regional

    0 months

  • Context - CTM program (interview)

    3 months

  • +17 more other outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Ethnicity and Culture in Focus

EXPERIMENTAL

CTM (Phase 5) is a 3-month, flexible, choice-based health-promoting program for low active older adults that can be delivered in-person or online. The program includes: * 1-on-1 Consultation: Participants meet 1-on-1 with their activity coach at the start of the program to set goals and develop a physical activity action plan tailored to their abilities, interests and resources. Older adults can choose to participate in individual or group-based activities. * Group Meetings: Participants will attend eight, 1-hour group-based meetings (max of 15 participants) led by their activity coach. Meetings cover a health-related discussion topic and provide time and space for social connection among participants. Meetings can be held online or in-person. The CTM program will be adapted for South Asian older adults, and may include additional intervention components customized for this population.

Behavioral: Choose to Move

Men on the Move

EXPERIMENTAL

CTM (Phase 5) is a 3-month, flexible, choice-based health-promoting program for low active older adults that can be delivered in-person or online. The program includes: * 1-on-1 Consultation: Participants meet 1-on-1 with their activity coach at the start of the program to set goals and develop a physical activity action plan tailored to their abilities, interests and resources. Older adults can choose to participate in individual or group-based activities. * Group Meetings: Participants will attend eight, 1-hour group-based meetings (max of 15 participants) led by their activity coach. Meetings cover a health-related discussion topic and provide time and space for social connection among participants. Meetings can be held online or in-person. The CTM program will be adapted for older men, and may include additional intervention components customized for this population.

Behavioral: Choose to Move

The Forgotten North

EXPERIMENTAL

CTM (Phase 5) is a 3-month, flexible, choice-based health-promoting program for low active older adults that can be delivered in-person or online. The program includes: * 1-on-1 Consultation: Participants meet 1-on-1 with their activity coach at the start of the program to set goals and develop a physical activity action plan tailored to their abilities, interests and resources. Older adults can choose to participate in individual or group-based activities. * Group Meetings: Participants will attend eight, 1-hour group-based meetings (max of 15 participants) led by their activity coach. Meetings cover a health-related discussion topic and provide time and space for social connection among participants. Meetings can be held online or in-person. The CTM program will be adapted for older adults living in Northern BC, and may include additional intervention components customized for this population.

Behavioral: Choose to Move

Interventions

Choose to MoveBEHAVIORAL

As described under study arm description

Ethnicity and Culture in FocusMen on the MoveThe Forgotten North

Eligibility Criteria

Age50 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Central support unit staff member;
  • Delivery partner organization staff member;
  • Activity coach hired by delivery partner organization (activity coaches must speak English to participate in the evaluation);
  • English-speaking older adults (aged \>=50 years) who participate in CTM (recruited by delivery partner organizations) will be invited to participate in the evaluation;
  • Punjabi-speaking older adults will also be invited to participate in the evaluation if they can read English or Punjabi and/or if the activity coach or a member of the research team has the necessary language skills to ensure effective communication of the Punjabi language translated consent form and surveys.

You may not qualify if:

  • non-English speaking delivery partner staff member
  • non-English speaking activity coach

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Active Aging Research Team, Robert H. N. Ho Research Centre

Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9, Canada

Location

Related Publications (18)

  • Curran GM, Bauer M, Mittman B, Pyne JM, Stetler C. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care. 2012 Mar;50(3):217-26. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812.

    PMID: 22310560BACKGROUND
  • Milton K, Bull FC, Bauman A. Reliability and validity testing of a single-item physical activity measure. Br J Sports Med. 2011 Mar;45(3):203-8. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.068395. Epub 2010 May 19.

    PMID: 20484314BACKGROUND
  • Hughes ME, Waite LJ, Hawkley LC, Cacioppo JT. A Short Scale for Measuring Loneliness in Large Surveys: Results From Two Population-Based Studies. Res Aging. 2004;26(6):655-672. doi: 10.1177/0164027504268574.

    PMID: 18504506BACKGROUND
  • Macdonald HM, Nettlefold L, Bauman A, Sims-Gould J, McKay HA. Pragmatic Evaluation of Older Adults' Physical Activity in Scale-Up Studies: Is the Single-Item Measure a Reasonable Option? J Aging Phys Act. 2022 Feb 1;30(1):25-32. doi: 10.1123/japa.2020-0412. Epub 2021 Aug 4.

    PMID: 34348228BACKGROUND
  • Simonsick EM, Newman AB, Visser M, Goodpaster B, Kritchevsky SB, Rubin S, Nevitt MC, Harris TB; Health, Aging and Body Composition Study. Mobility limitation in self-described well-functioning older adults: importance of endurance walk testing. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2008 Aug;63(8):841-7. doi: 10.1093/gerona/63.8.841.

    PMID: 18772472BACKGROUND
  • Veroff JB. The dynamics of help-seeking in men and women: a national survey study. Psychiatry. 1981 Aug;44(3):189-200.

    PMID: 7267859BACKGROUND
  • Bauer GR, Braimoh J, Scheim AI, Dharma C. Transgender-inclusive measures of sex/gender for population surveys: Mixed-methods evaluation and recommendations. PLoS One. 2017 May 25;12(5):e0178043. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178043. eCollection 2017.

    PMID: 28542498BACKGROUND
  • Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83.

    PMID: 1593914BACKGROUND
  • Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, Bunger A, Griffey R, Hensley M. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Mar;38(2):65-76. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7.

    PMID: 20957426BACKGROUND
  • McKay H, Naylor PJ, Lau E, Gray SM, Wolfenden L, Milat A, Bauman A, Race D, Nettlefold L, Sims-Gould J. Implementation and scale-up of physical activity and behavioural nutrition interventions: an evaluation roadmap. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Nov 7;16(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0868-4.

    PMID: 31699095BACKGROUND
  • Durlak JA, DuPre EP. Implementation matters: a review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. Am J Community Psychol. 2008 Jun;41(3-4):327-50. doi: 10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0.

    PMID: 18322790BACKGROUND
  • Weiner BJ. A theory of organizational readiness for change. Implement Sci. 2009 Oct 19;4:67. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-67.

    PMID: 19840381BACKGROUND
  • Subedi R, Aitken N, Greenberg L. Canadian Social Environment Typology User Guide. Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada; 2022.

    BACKGROUND
  • Scaccia JP, Cook BS, Lamont A, Wandersman A, Castellow J, Katz J, Beidas RS. A practical implementation science heuristic for organizational readiness: R = MC2. J Community Psychol. 2015 Apr;43(4):484-501. doi: 10.1002/jcop.21698. Epub 2015 Apr 13.

    PMID: 26668443BACKGROUND
  • Miller CJ, Barnett ML, Baumann AA, Gutner CA, Wiltsey-Stirman S. The FRAME-IS: a framework for documenting modifications to implementation strategies in healthcare. Implement Sci. 2021 Apr 7;16(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01105-3.

    PMID: 33827716BACKGROUND
  • Wiltsey Stirman S, Baumann AA, Miller CJ. The FRAME: an expanded framework for reporting adaptations and modifications to evidence-based interventions. Implement Sci. 2019 Jun 6;14(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0898-y.

    PMID: 31171014BACKGROUND
  • Xie F, Pullenayegum E, Gaebel K, Bansback N, Bryan S, Ohinmaa A, Poissant L, Johnson JA; Canadian EQ-5D-5L Valuation Study Group. A Time Trade-off-derived Value Set of the EQ-5D-5L for Canada. Med Care. 2016 Jan;54(1):98-105. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000447.

    PMID: 26492214BACKGROUND
  • Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, Bonsel G, Badia X. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x. Epub 2011 Apr 9.

    PMID: 21479777BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Mobility LimitationSedentary BehaviorSocial IsolationMotor Activity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Signs and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsBehaviorSocial Behavior

Study Officials

  • Heather A McKay, PhD

    University of British Columbia

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Joanie Sims Gould, PhD

    University of British Columbia

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Dawn Mackey, PhD

    Simon Fraser University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Farinaz Havaei, RN, PhD

    University of British Columbia

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 1, 2024

First Posted

February 9, 2024

Study Start

August 6, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2027

Last Updated

March 27, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations