Development and Evaluation of TRIVEL Smart Bike Training Prescription Programs.
Cycling for Improved Health: Development and Evaluation of TRIVEL's Smart Bike Training Prescription Programs
1 other identifier
interventional
10
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This pilot A-B study aims to develop and validate personalized training programs for older adults with decreased mobility on a Semi-Reclining Intelligent Stationary Bike prototype. The study also aims to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the training programs and to document their preliminary effects on physical health, perceived well-being, and quality of life. Ten participants will take part in five personalized training sessions with the intelligent bike and five standard training sessions with a traditional stationary bike.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 15, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 23, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 26, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2024
CompletedApril 26, 2024
April 1, 2024
4 months
February 23, 2024
April 23, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Walking ability and functional capacity
2min walk test (2MWT): the participants will be asked to walk as fast as they can, safely, without assistance for two minutes. This outcome will be measured 3 times at baseline and once at the end of each phase of the trial.
8 to 10 weeks
Leg strength and endurance
The sit to stand test: evaluated as the number of stands a person can complete in 30 seconds. This outcome will be measured 3 times at baseline and once at the end of each phase of the trial.
8-9 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Well-being
8-9 weeks
Quality of life
8-9 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Experimental AB group
EXPERIMENTALIn this arm, 5 participants will train on the intelligent bike for 5 sessions followed by 5 sessions on a conventional bike (5 participants).
Active comparator BA group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe participants in this arm will start training on a conventional bike for 5 sessions followed by 5 sessions on the intelligent bike (5 participants).
Interventions
A stationary motorized bike prototype that can evaluate lower limb functions such as strength, coordination, range of motion, and tonus. Based on the evaluation results, the iBike proposes a training program that is specific to each individual needs. Moreover, the intelligent bike offers diverse pedaling modes such as forward and backward pedaling, assisted pedaling, isotonic pedaling and pedaling with sensory stimulations.
A conventional stationary bike that can be found in gyms or rehab centers.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Being aged 50 and over
- Having impaired standing mobility associated with aging and/or a stable chronic illness (\> 6 months; controlled health condition, no change in medication, routine medical follow-up ; no emergency consultation episode).
- Being able to walk without human assistance for short distances
- Being able to tolerate 90 minutes of activities with rest.
- Being able able to come to the research center for 13 visits, twice a week.
You may not qualify if:
- Individuals with or at high risk of having a heart or lung condition (thoracic surgery, angina, myocardial infarction, uncontrolled high blood pressure, shortness of breath at rest).
- Being unable to pedal on a seated stationary bike.
- Having active treatments, including physiotherapy and occupational therapy.
- Having moderate and severe cognitive problems (Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score≤ 21/30).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Sylvie Nadeaulead
Study Sites (1)
L'Institut de réadaptation Gingras-Lindsay-de-Montréal
Montreal, Quebec, H3S 2J4, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sylvie Nadeau, PhD
Université de Montréal
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 23, 2024
First Posted
April 26, 2024
Study Start
January 15, 2024
Primary Completion
May 1, 2024
Study Completion
May 1, 2024
Last Updated
April 26, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share