Evaluating Impact and Implementation of Choose to Move (Phase 4)
CTM
Choose to Move (Phase 4): Impact and Implementation Evaluation of a Program to Enhance Older Adult Physical Activity, Mobility and Health
2 other identifiers
interventional
550
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objectives of this study are to: 1) evaluate whether Choose to Move (CTM) Phase 4 improves health outcomes in older adults who participate and 2) assess whether CTM Phase 4 is delivered as planned and what factors support or inhibit its delivery at scale. CTM Phase 4 is a 3-month, choice-based program for low active older adults being scaled-up across British Columbia (BC), Canada. The goals of CTM are to enhance physical activity, mobility and social connectedness in older adults living in BC, Canada.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 17, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 19, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 10, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 29, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 29, 2025
CompletedMarch 27, 2025
March 1, 2025
4.4 years
December 19, 2022
March 24, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in physical activity
The single item physical activity questionnaire will be used to measure physical activity. Output variable is self-reported number of days/week ≥30 min physical activity in the past week (range 0-7).
0, 3, 6, 15, 27-months
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Change in capacity for mobility
0, 3, 6, 15, 27-months
Change in physical functioning
0, 3, 6, 15, 27-months
Change in mobility
0, 3, 6, 15, 27-months
Change in loneliness
0, 3, 6, 15, 27-months
Change in social isolation
0, 3, 6, 15, 27-months
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (15)
Reach-individual
3-months
Reach-organizational
3-months
Dose delivered
3-months
- +12 more other outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Choose to Move
EXPERIMENTALCTM (Phase 4) is a 3-month, flexible, choice-based program for low active older adults that can be delivered in-person or online. CTM includes * One-on-One Consultation: Participants meet 1-on-1 with their activity coach at the start of the program to set goals and develop an action plan tailored to their abilities, interests and resources. Older adults can choose to participate in individual or group-based activities. * Group Meetings: Over the 3-months, participants will attend eight, 1-hour group-based meetings (up to 12 participants total) led by their activity coach. Meetings cover a discussion topic (health-related) and provide time and space for social connection between participants. Group meetings are held in person or online as public health restrictions and community preference dictate.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ≥60 years of age
- demonstrate readiness for physical activity via the PAR-Q+ questionnaire, Get Active Questionnaire, or a letter of recommendation from their physician
- \<150 min/week physical activity
- English speaking
- Able to connect to the Zoom or GoToMeeting platform via phone or internet in order to participate in virtual group meetings (for online programs only)
You may not qualify if:
- Previous participation in CTM
- Activity coaches will be English speaking, British Columbia Recreation and Parks Association (BCRPA) registered older adult fitness leaders or kinesiologists who are delivering CTM at participating centres
- Recreation Managers and Coordinators affiliated with participating centres delivering CTM
- Provincial Partners (e.g., individuals/partners who make strategic and/or policy decisions) at partner organizations delivering Choose to Move
- Able to connect to the Zoom or GoToMeeting platform via internet (video and audio required in order to see and hear participants) for online programs
- Able to connect to the Zoom or GoToMeeting platform via phone or internet in order to participate in virtual group meetings (for online programs only)
- Currently (or recently completed) participating in CTM evaluation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of British Columbialead
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)collaborator
- Active Aging Societycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Centre for Hip Health and Mobility, Robert H.N. Ho Research Centre, University of British Columbia
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9, Canada
Related Publications (16)
Curran GM, Bauer M, Mittman B, Pyne JM, Stetler C. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care. 2012 Mar;50(3):217-26. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812.
PMID: 22310560BACKGROUNDHughes ME, Waite LJ, Hawkley LC, Cacioppo JT. A Short Scale for Measuring Loneliness in Large Surveys: Results From Two Population-Based Studies. Res Aging. 2004;26(6):655-672. doi: 10.1177/0164027504268574.
PMID: 18504506BACKGROUNDLau, E. Y., Wandersman, A.H., & Pate, R. R. Factors Influencing Implementation of Youth Physical Activity Interventions: An Expert Perspective. Translational Journal of the ACSM: July 1, 2016 - Volume 1 - Issue 7 - p 60-70 doi: 10.1249/TJX.0000000000000006
BACKGROUNDLubben J, Blozik E, Gillmann G, Iliffe S, von Renteln Kruse W, Beck JC, Stuck AE. Performance of an abbreviated version of the Lubben Social Network Scale among three European community-dwelling older adult populations. Gerontologist. 2006 Aug;46(4):503-13. doi: 10.1093/geront/46.4.503.
PMID: 16921004BACKGROUNDMarshall AL, Miller YD, Burton NW, Brown WJ. Measuring total and domain-specific sitting: a study of reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010 Jun;42(6):1094-102. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181c5ec18.
PMID: 19997030BACKGROUNDRejeski WJ, Rushing J, Guralnik JM, Ip EH, King AC, Manini TM, Marsh AP, McDermott MM, Fielding RA, Newman AB, Tudor-Locke C, Gill TM; LIFE Study Group. The MAT-sf: identifying risk for major mobility disability. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2015 May;70(5):641-6. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glv003. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
PMID: 25680917BACKGROUNDSimonsick EM, Newman AB, Visser M, Goodpaster B, Kritchevsky SB, Rubin S, Nevitt MC, Harris TB; Health, Aging and Body Composition Study. Mobility limitation in self-described well-functioning older adults: importance of endurance walk testing. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2008 Aug;63(8):841-7. doi: 10.1093/gerona/63.8.841.
PMID: 18772472BACKGROUNDEuroQol Group. EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990 Dec;16(3):199-208. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9.
PMID: 10109801BACKGROUNDVeroff, J., Kulka, R. A., & Douvan, E. A. M. (1981). Mental health in America: patterns of help-seeking from, 1957 to 1976: patterns of help-seeking from 1957 to 1976. Basic Books.
BACKGROUNDWarburton, D. E., Jamnik, V. K., Bredin, S. S., & Gledhill, N. (2011). The physical activity readiness questionnaire for everyone (PAR-Q+) and electronic physical activity readiness medical examination (ePARmed-X+). The Health & Fitness Journal of Canada, 4(2), 3-17.
BACKGROUNDWare, J. E. (1989). SF-36 health status questionnaire. Boston, MA: Institute for the Improvement of Medical Care and Health, New England Medical Center Hospital, Quality Quest Inc.
BACKGROUNDMilton K, Bull FC, Bauman A. Reliability and validity testing of a single-item physical activity measure. Br J Sports Med. 2011 Mar;45(3):203-8. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.068395. Epub 2010 May 19.
PMID: 20484314BACKGROUNDHolt, D.T., Armenakis, A.A., Feild, H.S., & Harris, S.G. Readiness for Organizational Change: the systematic development of a scale. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 2007; 43(2): 232-255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886306295295
BACKGROUNDVancouver Coastal Health, Fraser Health, University of British Columbia. My Health My Community Survey. 2014. https://myhealthmycommunity.org/
BACKGROUNDNettlefold L, Macdonald HM, Sims Gould J, Bauman A, Szewczyk Z, McKay HA. Does optimizing Choose to Move - a health-promoting program for older adults - enhance scalability, program implementation and effectiveness? Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Dec 18;21(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01649-9.
PMID: 39695643DERIVEDGray SM, Nettlefold L, Mackey D, Gould JS, McKay HA. Feasibility of a Virtual Health-Promoting Intervention (Choose to Move) for Older Adults: A Rapid Adaptation in Response to COVID-19. J Aging Phys Act. 2023 Aug 3;31(6):1003-1015. doi: 10.1123/japa.2023-0011. Print 2023 Dec 1.
PMID: 37536680DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Heather A McKay, PhD
University of British Columbia
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Joanie Sims Gould, PhD
University of British Columbia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 19, 2022
First Posted
January 10, 2023
Study Start
September 17, 2020
Primary Completion
January 29, 2025
Study Completion
January 29, 2025
Last Updated
March 27, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share