Live-streaming Vs Face-to-face Teaching Method Effectiveness in Training Surgical Clerkship
LS vs FTF
Objective Assessment of Live-streaming Vs Face-to-face Teaching Method Effectiveness in Training Simple Wound Suturing Skill to Surgical Clerkship
1 other identifier
interventional
74
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this observational study is to assess objectively whether teaching for simple wound sutures via Live-Streaming (LS) using Go-pro® has the same effectiveness as the traditional Face-to-face (FTF) teaching. The main question it aims to answer is whether training simple wound suturing skills to surgical clerkships via LS has the same effectiveness as the FTF training. After initially doing pre-test, participants will be randomized into two groups: LS and FTF. After teaching exposure, the participants will be given 1 week period of self-training to master the skill (as such procedural skills require a period of self training before we examine the effect of teaching exposure). Afterwards, they underwent post-test again with the previously same examiner, using the same OSCE rubric to avoid bias. Researchers will compare if the LS and FTF groups to see if training simple wound suturing skills to surgical clerkships via LS has the same effectiveness as the FTF training.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 9, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 15, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 24, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 9, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 10, 2024
CompletedNovember 8, 2024
November 1, 2024
3 months
January 15, 2024
November 6, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Post-test Scores
Post-test Objective Structured Clinical Exam (OSCE) scores Value ranges from 0 to 60. Higher score means better outcome, and vice versa.
1 week after teaching
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Numerical Differences of Pre-test and Post-test (Delta)
1 week after teaching
Study Arms (2)
Face-to-face
ACTIVE COMPARATORFace-to-face teaching method
Live-streaming
EXPERIMENTALLive-streaming teaching method
Interventions
FTF group are participants who will learn simple sutures physically present with the instructor in the same room.
One general surgeon (FH) will teach the participants how to do simple sutures on a mannequin, starting by explaining, then doing a live-demo step-by-step of simple wound suturing. The instructor uses a GoPro Hero 8 device on her head which is connected to the internet and produced live-streaming video, which will then be watched by LS group.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Surgery clerkships
- Willing to participate voluntarily and give consent to the study
You may not qualify if:
- Participants who drop out between 1 week period of pre-test and post-test
- Participants not willing to be involved in the teaching exposure
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Pelita Harapan University
Tangerang, Banten, 15811, Indonesia
Related Publications (5)
Foo CC, Cheung B, Chu KM. A comparative study regarding distance learning and the conventional face-to-face approach conducted problem-based learning tutorial during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Med Educ. 2021 Mar 3;21(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02575-1.
PMID: 33658015BACKGROUNDMcKechnie T, Levin M, Zhou K, Freedman B, Palter VN, Grantcharov TP. Virtual Surgical Training During COVID-19: Operating Room Simulation Platforms Accessible From Home. Ann Surg. 2020 Aug;272(2):e153-e154. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003999. No abstract available.
PMID: 32675522BACKGROUNDDoulias T, Gallo G, Rubio-Perez I, Breukink SO, Hahnloser D. Doing More with Less: Surgical Training in the COVID-19 Era. J Invest Surg. 2022 Jan;35(1):171-179. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2020.1824250. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
PMID: 32959688BACKGROUNDNavia A, Parada L, Urbina G, Vidal C, Morovic CG. Optimizing intraoral surgery video recording for residents' training during the COVID-19 pandemic: Comparison of 3 point of views using a GoPro. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021 May;74(5):1101-1160. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.10.068. Epub 2020 Nov 8. No abstract available.
PMID: 33199220BACKGROUNDSong JSA, McGuire C, Vaculik M, Morzycki A, Plourde M. Cross sectional analysis of student-led surgical societies in fostering medical student interest in Canada. BMC Med Educ. 2019 Mar 8;19(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1502-5.
PMID: 30849966BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Freda Halim, Dr, dr, SpB
Pelita Harapan University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Head of Surgery Department, Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 15, 2024
First Posted
January 24, 2024
Study Start
January 9, 2024
Primary Completion
April 9, 2024
Study Completion
April 10, 2024
Last Updated
November 8, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Time Frame
- The data will be available shortly after the study is finished, and will be available publicly for as long as needed.
- Access Criteria
- Open
Individual participant data (IPD) will be made publicly available as part of an open access dataset.