Telemedicine vs. Face-to-Face Cancer Genetic Counseling
2 other identifiers
interventional
130
1 country
4
Brief Summary
Cancer genetic counseling (CGC) has been found to have "substantial" benefits for individuals with breast cancer and their family members; it has been deemed by multiple organizations as "standard of care" for women with breast cancer and their relatives. Unfortunately, there is a disparity in access to CGC, especially among women who live in rural and underserved areas. In North Carolina, only two cancer genetic counselors practice in rural clinics - each only for a few days per month. Therefore, in an effort to make CGC more widely available in a timely manner, we propose to test provision of counseling through telemedicine (TM), in which a patient and health care provider communicate with each other using videoconferencing. In 4 rural oncology clinics, we will implement low-cost TM and compare satisfaction and cost-effectiveness between groups of women designated to have their CGC session by TM or FTF. We'll use a validated measure to assess satisfaction by a phone survey one week after the CGC appointment; cost-effectiveness will be measured at project's end by calculating length of wait time for appointment and costs of equipment, labor, and mileage. Study hypothesis: TM is as satisfactory as FTF counseling and is a more cost-effective way to provide this beneficial service.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2008
Typical duration for not_applicable
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 25, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 7, 2008
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2011
CompletedFebruary 22, 2012
February 1, 2012
2.6 years
January 25, 2008
February 21, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Patient satisfaction
One week post-intervention (genetic counseling session)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Cost-effectiveness
Enrollment completion
Study Arms (2)
TM
OTHERTelemedicine genetic counseling group
FTF
OTHERFace-to-face genetic counseling group
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Individuals referred for cancer genetic counseling (e.g., by medical oncologist, primary care physician or self) in one of 4 oncology clinics: Gibson Cancer Center in Lumberton, NC; Scotland Cancer Treatment Center in Laurinburg, NC; Johnston Cancer Center in Smithfield, NC; and Maria Parham Cancer Center in Henderson, NC.
- Willing to be randomized to receive counseling via telemedicine or face-to-face.
You may not qualify if:
- Referred for cancer genetic counseling from any clinic other than the 4 listed above.
- Unwilling to be randomized to receive counseling via telemedicine or face-to-face.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Duke Universitylead
- Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundationcollaborator
Study Sites (4)
Maria Parham Medical Center
Henderson, North Carolina, 27536, United States
Scotland Cancer Treatment Center
Laurinburg, North Carolina, 28352, United States
Gibson Cancer Center
Lumberton, North Carolina, 28358, United States
Johnston Cancer Center
Smithfield, North Carolina, 27577, United States
Related Publications (1)
Buchanan AH, Datta SK, Skinner CS, Hollowell GP, Beresford HF, Freeland T, Rogers B, Boling J, Marcom PK, Adams MB. Randomized Trial of Telegenetics vs. In-Person Cancer Genetic Counseling: Cost, Patient Satisfaction and Attendance. J Genet Couns. 2015 Dec;24(6):961-70. doi: 10.1007/s10897-015-9836-6. Epub 2015 Apr 3.
PMID: 25833335DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Martha B Adams, M.D., M.A.
Duke University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 25, 2008
First Posted
February 7, 2008
Study Start
August 1, 2008
Primary Completion
March 1, 2011
Study Completion
April 1, 2011
Last Updated
February 22, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-02