Effect of Using (PEKK) Framework Versus (Co- Cr) Framework on The Bone of Mandibular Implant Supported Hybrid Prostheses
Effect of Using Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) Framework Versus Cobalt Chromium Framework on The Supporting Structures of Mandibular Implant Supported Hybrid Prostheses
1 other identifier
interventional
14
1 country
1
Brief Summary
the purposse of the study To evaluate the effect of implant supported hybrid prostheses on the bone of the supporting structure of edentulous mandible using Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) framework versus cobalt chromium framework. fourteen female patients with lower single edentulous ridges are chosen with adequate dental hygiene, enough interarch space and free of systemic diseases and parafunctional habits. Patients who received new single dentures are randomly allocated into each group using computer software program and five intraforaminal implants were inserted parallel using surgical guide.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2021
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 8, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 2, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 2, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 7, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 19, 2023
CompletedDecember 19, 2023
December 1, 2023
1.2 years
December 7, 2023
December 17, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
amount of bone loss around implant
The points of first bone contact with the fixture platform were detected and changes of those points position through the two years of observation were registered as a criterion of bone changes with further calculation of average values. A software ruler of CBCT was used to measure the crestal bone height in contact with the implant from the four aspects (buccal, lingual, mesial and distal).
2 years
Study Arms (2)
(PEKK fixed hybrid prostheses
OTHER5 implants were placed in mandibular arch by surgical guide and after 3 months the prostheses was constructed by using digital workflow
PFM fixed hybrid prostheses
OTHER5 implants were placed in mandibular arch by surgical guide and after 3 months the prostheses was constructed by using digital workflow until making wax pattern the casting was made.
Interventions
5 implant were placed in intraforaminal area using surgical guide
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient's age range from 50 to 60 year's old.
- All patients are with completely edentulous mandible.
- Good oral hygiene is mandatory.
- Sufficient interarch space to accept implant supported fixed prosthesis will be diagnosed by mounted diagnostic casts.
- Firm and healthy mucosa covering the alveolar ridge.
- Minimum bone width 5.5mm buccolinguallly and 10 mm height will be diagnosed by the preoperative cone beam CT scan.
You may not qualify if:
- \- Vulnerable group; prisoners, mentally, physically disabled, pregnant females.
- Patients with Para functional habits.
- Patients having TMJ disorders.
- Uncontrolled diabetic patients
- Patients have any medical condition or any disease that could interfere with implant placement or affect bone loss.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Dalia Mohammed Farid
Cairo, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
dina essam bahig
Ain Shams University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- all the selected patients were rehabilitated with lower single denture then divided by computer randomization using random allocation software
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 7, 2023
First Posted
December 19, 2023
Study Start
June 8, 2021
Primary Completion
September 2, 2022
Study Completion
September 2, 2023
Last Updated
December 19, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-12