Evaluation of Short Implants' Success for Teeth Replacement in Atrophic Posterior Mandibular Ridge
1 other identifier
interventional
16
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study was to evaluate clinically and radiographically the splinted short implants' and single short implants' stability and bone condition before and after loading, in atrophic posterior mandibular alveolar ridges.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 14, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 20, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 20, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 30, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 4, 2020
CompletedJune 4, 2020
May 1, 2020
9 months
May 30, 2020
May 30, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Implant Stability
Implant stability was measured using Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ), a scale from 1 to 100. The ISQ scale has a non-linear correlation to micro-mobility. High stability means \>70 ISQ, between 60-69 is medium stability and \< 60 ISQ is considered as low stability.
Immediately after the operation
Implant Stability
Implant stability was measured using Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ), a scale from 1 to 100. The ISQ scale has a non-linear correlation to micro-mobility. High stability means \>70 ISQ, between 60-69 is medium stability and \< 60 ISQ is considered as low stability.
3 months
Implant Stability
Implant stability was measured using Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ), a scale from 1 to 100. The ISQ scale has a non-linear correlation to micro-mobility. High stability means \>70 ISQ, between 60-69 is medium stability and \< 60 ISQ is considered as low stability.
6 months
Study Arms (2)
Two short implants
EXPERIMENTALDENTIUM superline implant fixture is characterized by sandblasted with large grits and acid etched surface treatment (S.L.A). SLA surface allows good bone-implant contact with good clinical performance, maintaining crestal bone margin. Short Implants of 7.0 mm length and 4.5 mm diameter are to be used. The Short Implants are characterized by 1.5mm supra-bony smooth collar, and 5.5mm infra-bony surface treated double threaded titanium.
Single short implant
ACTIVE COMPARATORDENTIUM superline implant fixture is characterized by sandblasted with large grits and acid etched surface treatment (S.L.A). SLA surface allows good bone-implant contact with good clinical performance, maintaining crestal bone margin. Short Implants of 7.0 mm length and 4.5 mm diameter are to be used. The Short Implants are characterized by 1.5mm supra-bony smooth collar, and 5.5mm infra-bony surface treated double threaded titanium.
Interventions
Patients receives 2 short implants to restore missing posterior teeth, loaded with splinted screw retained crowns.
Patients receives single short implants, loaded with single screw retained crowns.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Missing Posterior teeth, indicated for short implant placement.
- Residual alveolar ridge at 6-8 mm height and at least 7mm width.
- Healthy band of keratinized attached mucosa.
- Good Oral hygiene.
- Medically fit patient, free from relevant diseases.
You may not qualify if:
- Medically compromised patients.
- Imunnocompromised patients
- Patients with Para-functional habits.
- Smokers
- Poor Oral hygiene.
- Patient refuse to undergo the surgery.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University
Alexandria, 21527, Egypt
Related Publications (12)
Glantz PO, Nilner K. Biomechanical aspects of prosthetic implant-borne reconstructions. Periodontol 2000. 1998 Jun;17:119-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.1998.tb00129.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 10337319BACKGROUNDRenouard F, Nisand D. Short implants in the severely resorbed maxilla: a 2-year retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005;7 Suppl 1:S104-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00082.x.
PMID: 16137095BACKGROUNDTallgren A. The reduction in face height of edentulous and partially edentulous subjects during long-term denture wear. A longitudinal roentgenographic cephalometric study. Acta Odontol Scand. 1966 Sep;24(2):195-239. doi: 10.3109/00016356609026127. No abstract available.
PMID: 5225747BACKGROUNDNevins M, Al Hezaimi K, Schupbach P, Karimbux N, Kim DM. Vertical ridge augmentation using an equine bone and collagen block infused with recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB: a randomized single-masked histologic study in non-human primates. J Periodontol. 2012 Jul;83(7):878-84. doi: 10.1902/jop.2012.110478. Epub 2012 Jan 5.
PMID: 22220770BACKGROUNDChiapasco M, Casentini P, Zaniboni M. Bone augmentation procedures in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24 Suppl:237-59.
PMID: 19885448BACKGROUNDdas Neves FD, Fones D, Bernardes SR, do Prado CJ, Neto AJ. Short implants--an analysis of longitudinal studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006 Jan-Feb;21(1):86-93.
PMID: 16519186BACKGROUNDNeldam CA, Pinholt EM. State of the art of short dental implants: a systematic review of the literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Aug;14(4):622-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00303.x. Epub 2010 Oct 26.
PMID: 20977606BACKGROUNDThoma DS, Haas R, Tutak M, Garcia A, Schincaglia GP, Hammerle CH. Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing short dental implants (6 mm) versus longer dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures. Part 1: demographics and patient-reported outcomes at 1 year of loading. J Clin Periodontol. 2015 Jan;42(1):72-80. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12323. Epub 2014 Dec 26.
PMID: 25418606BACKGROUNDLemos CA, Ferro-Alves ML, Okamoto R, Mendonca MR, Pellizzer EP. Short dental implants versus standard dental implants placed in the posterior jaws: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2016 Apr;47:8-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.01.005. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
PMID: 26804969BACKGROUNDMisch CE, Steignga J, Barboza E, Misch-Dietsh F, Cianciola LJ, Kazor C. Short dental implants in posterior partial edentulism: a multicenter retrospective 6-year case series study. J Periodontol. 2006 Aug;77(8):1340-7. doi: 10.1902/jop.2006.050402.
PMID: 16937587BACKGROUNDMenchero-Cantalejo E, Barona-Dorado C, Cantero-Alvarez M, Fernandez-Caliz F, Martinez-Gonzalez JM. Meta-analysis on the survival of short implants. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011 Jul 1;16(4):e546-51. doi: 10.4317/medoral.16.e546.
PMID: 21196883BACKGROUNDLum LB. A biomechanical rationale for the use of short implants. J Oral Implantol. 1991;17(2):126-31.
PMID: 1811063BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Oral Surgery Master's student
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 30, 2020
First Posted
June 4, 2020
Study Start
April 14, 2019
Primary Completion
January 20, 2020
Study Completion
February 20, 2020
Last Updated
June 4, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-05