NCT06132412

Brief Summary

Background: There is a high prevalence of chronic pain in the US, with nearly half of adults experiencing chronic pain. Chronic pain is associated with impaired mobility, specifically ambulation. Treatment for chronic knee pain is complex given that pain is not only due to peripheral sources, but also due to alterations of the central nervous system (CNS). Majority of physical therapy (PT) interventions involve a bottom-up approach targeting the peripheral pain sources and many patients (\~66%) do not respond to this treatment approach. Noninvasive brain stimulation techniques such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a novel and promising option for a top-down intervention that can have neuromodulatory effects on the CNS and may better target central factors associated with chronic pain. Purpose: To determine if tDCS delivered to the primary motor cortex in conjunction with individualized PT will result in greater improvements in pain and function compared to sham tDCS with individualized PT in individuals with chronic knee pain. Methods: This study will be performed at outpatient PT clinics at the University of Illinois Hospital. Eligible participants will include patients with chronic knee pain (duration \> 3 months) who have not undergone surgery to this area and are scheduled to receive formal PT intervention. Subjects will be randomized to the active tDCS + PT group or sham tDCS + PT group and will receive the intervention for 8 sessions. Outcomes include pain ratings, pressure pain thresholds, patient specific functional scale, lower extremity functional scale, quadriceps strength, knee range of motion, 2-minute walk test, 5 time sit to stand, patient health questionnaire-2, and Central Sensitization Inventory. Impact: The use of adjuvant therapies such as tDCS have the potential to optimize rehabilitation treatment for individuals with chronic pain by offering a more comprehensive treatment that targets peripheral and central sources of pain.

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
5mo left

Started Jun 2024

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress81%
Jun 2024Dec 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 30, 2023

Completed
16 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 15, 2023

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 6, 2024

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2025

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2026

Expected
Last Updated

May 11, 2026

Status Verified

May 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

October 30, 2023

Last Update Submit

May 8, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Recruitment ratio

    We will record the number of patients screened and enrolled in the study.

    through study completion, an average of 1 year

  • Pain (NPRS)

    This will be measured subjectively using the Numeric Pain rating scale (NPRS). The PT or key research personnel with ask the participant their pain rating using a 0-10 scale. They will ask the current pain intensity rating, highest and lowest pain intensity rating in the past 2 week period.

    baseline, every follow-up session through study completion

  • Two-minute walk test (2MWT)

    Distance walked, number of rest breaks and the assistive device(s) used during a 2MWT will be measured. From this test walking speed can also be calculated.

    baseline, at final intervention session

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Pressure pain threshold (PPT)

    baseline, at final intervention session

  • central sensitization inventory (CSI)

    baseline, at final intervention session

  • Lower extremity functional scale (LEFS)

    baseline, at final intervention session

  • Patient specific functional scale (PSFS)

    baseline, at final intervention session

  • Five time sit to stand (5STS)

    baseline, at final intervention session

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

active tDCS+PT

EXPERIMENTAL

For those participants assigned to the active or sham tDCS groups, the overall set-up will be identical between groups and will use the Mini-CT device. However, the sham tDCS group will have the tDCS device turned off after 30 seconds of stimulation. Saline-soaked sponge electrodes that are 35 cm\^2 in size will be used for both the active and sham tDCS groups. For electrode placement, the active electrode (anode) will be placed over M1 contralateral to the side of primary knee pain (over C3/4 using the 10-20 system for electrode placement), while the reference electrode (cathode) will be over the contralateral supraorbital region, which is ipsilateral to the painful knee (Fp2 using the 10-20 system). The intensity will be set at 2mA for the active tDCS group, following a 30 second ramp-up time. The participants in the active tDCS group will undergo 20 minutes of tDCS treatment prior to receiving individualized PT intervention.

Device: transcranial direct current stimulationOther: physical therapy

sham tDCS+PT

SHAM COMPARATOR

For those participants assigned to the active or sham tDCS groups, the overall set-up will be identical between groups and will use the Mini-CT tDCS device. However, the sham tDCS group will have the tDCS device turned off after 30 seconds of stimulation. Saline-soaked sponge electrodes that are 35 cm\^2 in size will be used for both the active and sham tDCS groups. For electrode placement, the active electrode (anode) will be placed over M1 contralateral to the side of primary knee pain (over C3/4 using the 10-20 system for electrode placement), while the reference electrode (cathode) will be over the contralateral supraorbital region, which is ipsilateral to the painful knee (Fp2 using the 10-20 system). The participants in the sham tDCS group will undergo 20 minutes of sham tDCS treatment prior to receiving individualized PT intervention.

Device: transcranial direct current stimulationOther: physical therapy

Interventions

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a form of noninvasive brain stimulation that can have neuromodulatory effects on central nervous system structures, specifically the primary motor cortex (M1), and can potentially target maladaptive plasticity and nociplastic sources of pain. There is both anodal and cathodal tDCS, anodal stimulation increases excitability of the cortex whereas cathodal stimulation decreases excitability. At the synaptic level, anodal tDCS induces effects that mimic long term potentiation (LTP), while cathodal tDCS results in long term depression.

Also known as: tDCS
active tDCS+PTsham tDCS+PT

Participants will receive individualized and impairment-based physical therapy treatment for their knee pain. This treatment can involve manual therapy, exercise or balance training depending on their particular needs.

Also known as: PT
active tDCS+PTsham tDCS+PT

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age \>/= 18 years old
  • Knee pain
  • Knee pain duration \>/= 3 months

You may not qualify if:

  • History of surgery on affected knee
  • Pregnant
  • Skin hypersensitivity
  • History of contact dermatitis
  • Any other skin or scalp condition that could be aggravated by tDCS
  • Previous adverse reactions to tDCS

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Illinois Hospital

Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Transcranial Direct Current StimulationPhysical Therapy Modalities

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Electric Stimulation TherapyTherapeuticsConvulsive TherapyPsychiatric Somatic TherapiesBehavioral Disciplines and ActivitiesElectroshockPsychological TechniquesRehabilitation

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor in Department of Physical Therapy

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 30, 2023

First Posted

November 15, 2023

Study Start

June 6, 2024

Primary Completion

December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Last Updated

May 11, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations