Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Conjunction With Individualized Physical Therapy for Individuals With Chronic Knee Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: There is a high prevalence of chronic pain in the US, with nearly half of adults experiencing chronic pain. Chronic pain is associated with impaired mobility, specifically ambulation. Treatment for chronic knee pain is complex given that pain is not only due to peripheral sources, but also due to alterations of the central nervous system (CNS). Majority of physical therapy (PT) interventions involve a bottom-up approach targeting the peripheral pain sources and many patients (\~66%) do not respond to this treatment approach. Noninvasive brain stimulation techniques such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a novel and promising option for a top-down intervention that can have neuromodulatory effects on the CNS and may better target central factors associated with chronic pain. Purpose: To determine if tDCS delivered to the primary motor cortex in conjunction with individualized PT will result in greater improvements in pain and function compared to sham tDCS with individualized PT in individuals with chronic knee pain. Methods: This study will be performed at outpatient PT clinics at the University of Illinois Hospital. Eligible participants will include patients with chronic knee pain (duration \> 3 months) who have not undergone surgery to this area and are scheduled to receive formal PT intervention. Subjects will be randomized to the active tDCS + PT group or sham tDCS + PT group and will receive the intervention for 8 sessions. Outcomes include pain ratings, pressure pain thresholds, patient specific functional scale, lower extremity functional scale, quadriceps strength, knee range of motion, 2-minute walk test, 5 time sit to stand, patient health questionnaire-2, and Central Sensitization Inventory. Impact: The use of adjuvant therapies such as tDCS have the potential to optimize rehabilitation treatment for individuals with chronic pain by offering a more comprehensive treatment that targets peripheral and central sources of pain.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 30, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 15, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 6, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2026
ExpectedMay 11, 2026
May 1, 2026
1.5 years
October 30, 2023
May 8, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Recruitment ratio
We will record the number of patients screened and enrolled in the study.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Pain (NPRS)
This will be measured subjectively using the Numeric Pain rating scale (NPRS). The PT or key research personnel with ask the participant their pain rating using a 0-10 scale. They will ask the current pain intensity rating, highest and lowest pain intensity rating in the past 2 week period.
baseline, every follow-up session through study completion
Two-minute walk test (2MWT)
Distance walked, number of rest breaks and the assistive device(s) used during a 2MWT will be measured. From this test walking speed can also be calculated.
baseline, at final intervention session
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Pressure pain threshold (PPT)
baseline, at final intervention session
central sensitization inventory (CSI)
baseline, at final intervention session
Lower extremity functional scale (LEFS)
baseline, at final intervention session
Patient specific functional scale (PSFS)
baseline, at final intervention session
Five time sit to stand (5STS)
baseline, at final intervention session
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
active tDCS+PT
EXPERIMENTALFor those participants assigned to the active or sham tDCS groups, the overall set-up will be identical between groups and will use the Mini-CT device. However, the sham tDCS group will have the tDCS device turned off after 30 seconds of stimulation. Saline-soaked sponge electrodes that are 35 cm\^2 in size will be used for both the active and sham tDCS groups. For electrode placement, the active electrode (anode) will be placed over M1 contralateral to the side of primary knee pain (over C3/4 using the 10-20 system for electrode placement), while the reference electrode (cathode) will be over the contralateral supraorbital region, which is ipsilateral to the painful knee (Fp2 using the 10-20 system). The intensity will be set at 2mA for the active tDCS group, following a 30 second ramp-up time. The participants in the active tDCS group will undergo 20 minutes of tDCS treatment prior to receiving individualized PT intervention.
sham tDCS+PT
SHAM COMPARATORFor those participants assigned to the active or sham tDCS groups, the overall set-up will be identical between groups and will use the Mini-CT tDCS device. However, the sham tDCS group will have the tDCS device turned off after 30 seconds of stimulation. Saline-soaked sponge electrodes that are 35 cm\^2 in size will be used for both the active and sham tDCS groups. For electrode placement, the active electrode (anode) will be placed over M1 contralateral to the side of primary knee pain (over C3/4 using the 10-20 system for electrode placement), while the reference electrode (cathode) will be over the contralateral supraorbital region, which is ipsilateral to the painful knee (Fp2 using the 10-20 system). The participants in the sham tDCS group will undergo 20 minutes of sham tDCS treatment prior to receiving individualized PT intervention.
Interventions
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a form of noninvasive brain stimulation that can have neuromodulatory effects on central nervous system structures, specifically the primary motor cortex (M1), and can potentially target maladaptive plasticity and nociplastic sources of pain. There is both anodal and cathodal tDCS, anodal stimulation increases excitability of the cortex whereas cathodal stimulation decreases excitability. At the synaptic level, anodal tDCS induces effects that mimic long term potentiation (LTP), while cathodal tDCS results in long term depression.
Participants will receive individualized and impairment-based physical therapy treatment for their knee pain. This treatment can involve manual therapy, exercise or balance training depending on their particular needs.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age \>/= 18 years old
- Knee pain
- Knee pain duration \>/= 3 months
You may not qualify if:
- History of surgery on affected knee
- Pregnant
- Skin hypersensitivity
- History of contact dermatitis
- Any other skin or scalp condition that could be aggravated by tDCS
- Previous adverse reactions to tDCS
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Illinois Hospital
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor in Department of Physical Therapy
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 30, 2023
First Posted
November 15, 2023
Study Start
June 6, 2024
Primary Completion
December 1, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Last Updated
May 11, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share