NCT06120998

Brief Summary

The goal of this longitudinal study is to understand the postoperative quality of life and dynamic trajectory of shoulder function in individuals with rotator cuff tears.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
201

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2020

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2020

Completed
3.2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 2, 2023

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 7, 2023

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 31, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 31, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

January 27, 2026

Status Verified

October 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

3.9 years

First QC Date

November 2, 2023

Last Update Submit

January 25, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

rotator cuff tearsquality of lifeultrasoundMRI

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Shoulder joint angles and strength were tracked preoperatively and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively.

    1. Patients were seated comfortably, and a goniometer was used to measure the active range of motion (ROM) of shoulder joint angles, including internal rotation, external rotation, abduction, extension, and flexion. 2. Patients were seated comfortably and a manual hydraulic push-pull dynamometer was used to measure the strength of internal rotation, external rotation, abduction, extension, and flexion.

    1 year

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Questionnaire Survey

    1 year

  • American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES Score)

    1 year

  • Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index(WORC)

    1 year

  • Taiwan Version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) Questionnaire

    1 year

  • EQ-5D Quality of Life Questionnaire for Preoperative Utility Assessment

    1 year

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Follow-up

    1 year

Study Arms (1)

Patients with rotator cuff tears pending for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

This is a Longitudinal Study. Patients were evaluated by orthopedic surgeons as having a rotator cuff tear, confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or ultrasound. If the patients required surgery and were willing to participate in the trial, the research assistant provided informed consent. The exclusion criteria were as follows. 1. Acromioclavicular arthritis requiring distal clavicular resection. 2. Severe glenohumeral arthritis (Hamada classification grade 3 or higher)15. 3. History of shoulder fracture. 4. Absolute contraindications to MRI, such as claustrophobia, pacemakers, neurostimulators, drug infusion pumps, artificial inner ear implants, and metallic implants.

Procedure: Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

Interventions

All patients were placed in a semi-sitting position. Initially, a posterior portal was established to explore the inside of the joint, a lateral portal was created for the removal of subacromial bursa, and an additional anterior portal was created for repairing the tendons. Measurements were taken to determine the extent of rotator cuff damage, including its anterior-posterior and medial-lateral dimensions. In cases where complete repair was possible, a single-row or double-row repair technique was used depending on the degree of tendon damage. For situations where complete repair was not feasible, partial repair was performed. If the tendon could be stretched after relaxation, it was repaired to an anatomical position near the bone bed with the assistance of acellular dermal reinforcement. However, if the tendon lacked elasticity and was fully retracted upon relaxation, acellular dermis was used to bridge the tendon back to the anatomical position.

Patients with rotator cuff tears pending for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients were evaluated by orthopedic surgeons as having a rotator cuff tear between August 2021 and July 2022, confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or ultrasound.

You may qualify if:

  • Patients were evaluated by orthopedic surgeons as having a rotator cuff tear between August 2021 and July 2022, confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or ultrasound. If the patients required surgery and were willing to participate in the trial, the research assistant provided informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Acromioclavicular arthritis requiring distal clavicular resection.
  • Severe glenohumeral arthritis (Hamada classification grade 3 or higher).
  • History of shoulder fracture.
  • Absolute contraindications to MRI, such as claustrophobia, pacemakers, neurostimulators, drug infusion pumps, artificial inner ear implants, and metallic implants.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Po-Cheng Chen

Kaohsiung City, 833, Taiwan

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Harris JD, Pedroza A, Jones GL; MOON (Multicenter Orthopedic Outcomes Network) Shoulder Group. Predictors of pain and function in patients with symptomatic, atraumatic full-thickness rotator cuff tears: a time-zero analysis of a prospective patient cohort enrolled in a structured physical therapy program. Am J Sports Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):359-66. doi: 10.1177/0363546511426003. Epub 2011 Nov 17.

  • Rhee YG, Cho NS, Yoo JH. Clinical outcome and repair integrity after rotator cuff repair in patients older than 70 years versus patients younger than 70 years. Arthroscopy. 2014 May;30(5):546-54. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.02.006. Epub 2014 Mar 14.

  • Chung SW, Park JS, Kim SH, Shin SH, Oh JH. Quality of life after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: evaluation using SF-36 and an analysis of affecting clinical factors. Am J Sports Med. 2012 Mar;40(3):631-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546511430309. Epub 2011 Dec 21.

  • Kolk A, Wolterbeek N, Auw Yang KG, Zijl JA, Wessel RN. Predictors of disease-specific quality of life after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Int Orthop. 2016 Feb;40(2):323-9. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2996-z. Epub 2015 Oct 27.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Rotator Cuff Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

RuptureWounds and InjuriesShoulder InjuriesTendon Injuries

Study Officials

  • Po-Cheng Chen, M.D., M.P.H.

    Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 2, 2023

First Posted

November 7, 2023

Study Start

September 1, 2020

Primary Completion

July 31, 2024

Study Completion

July 31, 2024

Last Updated

January 27, 2026

Record last verified: 2023-10

Locations