NCT02628457

Brief Summary

There are two purpose of this study, first is to find whether arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is changing the appearance of supraspinatus muscle atrophy in each and every patient. Second, is to find how much approximate change one can expect depending on age and tendon retraction

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
209

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2015

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2015

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 3, 2015

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 11, 2015

Completed
21 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

December 11, 2015

Status Verified

December 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

1 month

First QC Date

December 3, 2015

Last Update Submit

December 10, 2015

Conditions

Keywords

occupation ratiopseudoatrophy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • change in supraspinatus muscle atrophy

    Supraspinatus muscle atrophy was measured and evaluated according to the Thomazeau classification. Stage 1: slight atrophy occupation ratio (1.00-0.60), Stage 2: moderate atrophy occupation ratio (0.60-0.40), Stage 3: Severe atrophy occupation ratio(\<0.40). Both preoperative and immediate postoperative occupancy ratio calculated and from that change in occupancy ratio calculated for each and every patient.Postoperative occupation ratio was compared with preoperative occupation ratio within the groups and change in occupation ratio was used for comparison between the groups.

    within 1 week after surgery

Study Arms (3)

Mild Subgroup

patients with supraspinatus tendon retracted upto medial 1/3rd of humerus head and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair done by single row.

Procedure: arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

Moderate Subgroup

patients with supraspinatus tendon retracted between medial 1/3rd of humerus head and glenoid,and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair done by single row.

Procedure: arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

Severe subgroup

patients with supraspinatus tendon retracted beyond glenoid and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair done by single row

Procedure: arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

Interventions

arthroscopic rotator cuff repair done in all patients to check whether, surgery itself changes the appearance of muscle atrophy in the supraspinatus in all patients irrespective of size of preoperative tendon retraction

Mild SubgroupModerate SubgroupSevere subgroup

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

209 patients with degenerative rotator cuff tear who underwent single-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair between March 2012 and April 2015 in CM hospital

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with degenerative rotator cuff tear who underwent single-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in our hospital.
  • Patients with preoperative MRI and postoperative MRI within 1 week of surgery in our hospital.
  • Patients with minimum grade 1 supraspinatus atrophy in preoperative MRI.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with preoperative MRI from outside hospital.
  • Patients with isolated subscapularis tear.
  • Patients with previous operation on the same shoulder joint.
  • Patients with MRI images that were not usable due to poor quality or absence of appropriate Y-view.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Chungmu General Hopsital

Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, South Korea

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Rotator Cuff Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

RuptureWounds and InjuriesShoulder InjuriesTendon Injuries

Study Officials

  • sang-Hoon Lhee, MD PhD

    President, CM general Hospital

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Anant kumar Singh

    arthroscopy fellow, CM general Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 3, 2015

First Posted

December 11, 2015

Study Start

December 1, 2015

Primary Completion

January 1, 2016

Study Completion

January 1, 2016

Last Updated

December 11, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Sharing of data on the website is against the policy of IRB Korea

Locations