Sonoelastography to Predict Rotator Cuff Tears
Use Sonoelastography to Predict the Reparability of Large-to-massive Rotator Cuff Tears
1 other identifier
observational
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Large-to-massive rotator cuff tears accounts for 30% of all rotator cuff tears. These problems can be solved by surgeries, but only part of them can be completely repaired. The prognosis for partial repair is worse than complete repair, so evaluating the possibility of complete repair is so important that it will affect the decision of treatment. More and more recent researches focused on using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for evaluation of fatty infiltration of rotator cuff muscles to predict the reparability of large-to-massive rotator cuff tears. However, the availability of MRI is not that good as ultrasound, so some researchers are starting to use ultrasound to predict the reparability of large-to-massive rotator cuff tears. Because it is hard to observe the tissue quality through the general ultrasound, many researchers use sonoelastography to evaluate the tissue elasticity and viability. This aim of this study is to:
- 1.check the reliability of sonoelastography.
- 2.associate the findings of sonoelastography to the results of MRI.
- 3.build a predictive model for the reparability of large-to-massive rotator cuff tears.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Oct 2018
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 18, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 25, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 22, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2020
CompletedMarch 3, 2021
February 1, 2020
2.2 years
September 18, 2018
March 1, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Sonoelastography
This diagnostic test would be executed by a physician who has experiences of using Siemens Acuson S2000 ultrasound system for more than three year. The examination includes two of four rotator cuff muscles, listed as follows, supraspinatus muscle and infraspinatus muscle. Linear transducer (4-9 MHz) would be used for the whole test. The probe would be positioned along the longitudinal axis of the muscle belly. Compressive sonoelastography technique is used for semiquantitative analysis. In order to maintain the quality of images, quality factor needs to be over or equal to 60. The quantitative analysis was performed by shear wave sonoelastography. While assessing, the region of interest (ROI) would be divided into four quadrants. The physicians will measure the shear wave velocity for wight times at the center point of each quadrant.
Baseline
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Passive range of motions
Baseline
Muscle strength
Baseline
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score.
Baseline
MRI
Baseline
Surgical outcome
Baseline
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Interventions
This diagnostic test would be executed by a physician who has experiences of using Siemens Acuson S2000 ultrasound system for more than three year. The examination includes two of four rotator cuff muscles, listed as follows, supraspinatus muscle and infraspinatus muscle. Linear transducer (4-9 MHz) would be used for the whole test. The probe would be positioned along the longitudinal axis of the muscle belly. Compressive sonoelastography technique is used for semiquantitative analysis. In order to maintain the quality of images, quality factor needs to be over or equal to 60. The quantitative analysis was performed by shear wave sonoelastography and the region of interest (ROI) would be divided into four quadrants. The physicians will measure the shear wave velocity at the center point of each quadrant.
Eligibility Criteria
The investigator will enroll participants with diagnosis of large-to-massive rotator cuff tears who will receive surgical repairs later, and sonoelastography and MRI are necessary for preoperative evaluation.
You may qualify if:
- Patients who are diagnosed with rotator cuff tear by an orthopedist.
- The large-to-massive rotator cuff tears need to be confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasound. The definitions of this diagnosis include a tear over 3 cm or any full-thickness of tears in more than two rotator cuff muscles.
- Being willing to cooperated with the arranged examinations before the operation.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who are only diagnosed with partial-thickness rotator cuff muscle tears or small- to large- sized full-thickness tears.
- Patients who have acromioclavicular arthritis that needs distal clavicle resection.
- Patients who had serious glenohumeral arthritis, pseudoparalysis, or any other shoulder trauma history.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Kaohsiung City, 833, Taiwan
Related Publications (1)
Tseng YH, Chou WY, Wu KT, Chang CD, Chen YC, Huang YC, Lin WC, Chen PC. Use sonoelastography to predict the reparability of large-to-massive rotator cuff tears. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 2;99(27):e21139. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021139.
PMID: 32629749DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Po-Cheng Chen, MD
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 18, 2018
First Posted
September 25, 2018
Study Start
October 22, 2018
Primary Completion
December 31, 2020
Study Completion
December 31, 2020
Last Updated
March 3, 2021
Record last verified: 2020-02