Comparison of the Accuracy of Telehealth Examination Versus Clinical Examination in the Detection of Rotator Cuff Tears
1 other identifier
observational
65
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare how accurately a pseudo-telehealth shoulder examination diagnoses rotator cuff tears compared to a regular clinical examination. MRI is used as the gold standard.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Aug 2019
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 5, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 8, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 19, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 5, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 5, 2020
CompletedNovember 16, 2020
November 1, 2020
1.2 years
April 5, 2019
November 13, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Agreement with MRI findings as they pertain to presence or absence of a rotator cuff tear
% of exams that agreed with the MRI findings
Within 1 month of exam
Study Arms (1)
Shoulder patients
Interventions
This is a pseudo telehealth clinical exam for patients presenting with shoulder pain
This is a standard in-person clinical exam for patients presenting with shoulder pain
Eligibility Criteria
Patients over 40 with shoulder pain that can be MRIed
You may qualify if:
- years of age or older, presenting with shoulder pain, and seen in the Duke Sports Medicine clinic by Dr. Wittstein or Dr. Lassiter
You may not qualify if:
- Patient cannot have had prior shoulder arthroplasty, instability or history of fracture/dislocation. Pregnant women will be excluded from the study because there will be an MRI. Anyone unable or unwilling to have an MRI will be excluded from the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Duke Universitylead
Study Sites (2)
Southeastern Orthopedics Shoulder Center
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27609, United States
Duke Health Heritage
Wake Forest, North Carolina, 27587, United States
Related Publications (1)
Bradley KE, Cook C, Reinke EK, Vinson EN, Mather RC 3rd, Riboh J, Lassiter T, Wittstein JR. Comparison of the accuracy of telehealth examination versus clinical examination in the detection of shoulder pathology. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 May;30(5):1042-1052. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.08.016. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
PMID: 32871264RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jocelyn Wittstein, MD
Duke Health
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 5, 2019
First Posted
April 8, 2019
Study Start
August 19, 2019
Primary Completion
November 5, 2020
Study Completion
November 5, 2020
Last Updated
November 16, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share