Effects of an EMDR Intervention on Traumatic and Obsessive Symptoms
MDL
Randomized Trial on the Effects of an EMDR Intervention on Traumatic and Obsessive Symptoms During the COVID19 Quarantine: a Psychometric Study
1 other identifier
interventional
287
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing Protocol (EMDR) was first developed by Francine Shapiro in 1987 and can be adapted for online and in presence administration. The aim of this study is to assess if a EMDR program (administered both online and in presence, depending on different conditions of patients) may help people recruited from general population suffering from COVID19 second (November 2021 to February 2022) and third (March 2022 to May 2022) quarantine in improving post-traumatic stress (PTSD) and obsessive-compulsive-related (OCD) symptoms, as well as disgust, guilt, shame and their subjective unit of distress (SUD) and validity of cognition (VoC) levels.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 10, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 23, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 1, 2023
CompletedApril 16, 2024
April 1, 2024
7 months
October 23, 2023
April 14, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (12)
Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms - Pre-intervention
Post-Traumatic symptoms are measured using the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R). The scale ranges from a minimum value of 0 to a maximum value of 88. Lower Likert score means a better outcome
IES-R is measured immediately before the 8-week EMDR intervention
Obsessive-Compulsive Symptoms - Pre-intervention
Obsessive-Compulsive symptoms are measured using the Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (DOCS). The scale ranges from a minimum value of 0 to a maximum value of 80. Lower Likert score means a better outcome
DOCS is measured immediately before the 8-week EMDR intervention
Body Perception - Pre-intervention
Body Perception is measured using the Body Perception Questionnaire-22 (BPQ-22). The scale ranges from a minimum value of 22 to a maximum value of 66. Lower Likert score means a better outcome
BPQ-22 is measured immediately before the 8-week EMDR intervention
Guilt and Shame - Pre-intervention
Guilt and Shame are measured using the Guilt and Shame Proneness Scale (GASP). The scale ranges from a minimum value of 16 to a maximum value of 112. Lower Likert score means a better outcome
GASP is measured immediately before the 8-week EMDR intervention
Disgust - Pre-intervention
Disgust is measured using the Three Domain of Disgust Scale (TDDS). The scale ranges from a minimum value of 0 to a maximum value of 126. Lower Likert score means a better outcome
TDDS is measured immediately before the 8-week EMDR intervention
Mental Contamination - Pre-intervention
Mental Contamination is measured using the Vancouver Obsessional Compulsive Inventory-Mental Contamination scale (VOCI-MC). The scale ranges from a minimum value of 0 to a maximum value of 80. Lower Likert score means a better outcome
VOCI-MC is measured immediately before the 8-week EMDR intervention
Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms - Post-intervention
Post-Traumatic symptoms are measured using the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R). The scale ranges from a minimum value of 0 to a maximum value of 88. Lower Likert score means a better outcome
IES-R is measured immediately after the 8-week EMDR intervention
Obsessive-Compulsive Symptoms - Post-intervention
Obsessive-Compulsive symptoms are measured using the Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (DOCS). The scale ranges from a minimum value of 0 to a maximum value of 80. Lower Likert score means a better outcome
DOCS is measured immediately after the 8-week EMDR intervention
Body Perception - Post-intervention
Body Perception is measured using the Body Perception Questionnaire-22 (BPQ-22). The scale ranges from a minimum value of 22 to a maximum value of 66. Lower Likert score means a better outcome
BPQ-22 is measured immediately after the 8-week EMDR intervention
Guilt and Shame - Post-intervention
Guilt and Shame are measured using the Guilt and Shame Proneness Scale (GASP). The scale ranges from a minimum value of 16 to a maximum value of 112. Lower Likert score means a better outcome
GASP is measured immediately after the 8-week EMDR intervention
Disgust - Post-intervention
Disgust is measured using the Three Domain of Disgust Scale (TDDS). The scale ranges from a minimum value of 0 to a maximum value of 126. Lower Likert score means a better outcome
TDDS is measured immediately after the 8-week EMDR intervention
Mental Contamination - Post-intervention
Mental Contamination is measured using the Vancouver Obsessional Compulsive Inventory-Mental Contamination scale (VOCI-MC). The scale ranges from a minimum value of 0 to a maximum value of 80. Lower Likert score means a better outcome
VOCI-MC is measured immediately after the 8-week EMDR intervention
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Anxiety Symptoms - Pre-intervention
DASS-21 is measured immediately before the 8-week EMDR intervention
Depression Symptoms - Pre-intervention
DASS-21 is measured immediately before the 8-week EMDR intervention
General distress symptoms - Pre-intervention
DASS-21 is measured immediately before the 8-week EMDR intervention
Anxiety Symptoms - Post-intervention
DASS-21 is measured immediately after the 8-week EMDR intervention
Depression Symptoms - Post-intervention
DASS-21 is measured immediately after the 8-week EMDR intervention
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
8-week EMDR Intervention
EXPERIMENTALPhase 1: The therapist and client develop a secure working relationship. The client's history is discussed and a treatment plan is developed. Phase 2: The therapist explains the EMDR therapy process. Phase 3: The target event is identified. Baseline measures are set using the Subjective Units of Disturbance (SUD) and the Validity of Cognition (VOC) scale. Phase 4: Desensitization, sounds, or taps are begun while focusing on the traumatic event until the client's SUD reduces to zero. Phase 5: The client associates and strengthens a positive belief with the target event until it feels true. Phase 6: The client is asked to hold in mind the target event and the positive belief while scanning the body. Phase 7: Reprocessing is complete when the client feels neutral about it (SUD=0, VOC=7), and the body is clear of disturbance. Phase 8: The client and therapist discuss processed memories to ensure that distress is low and that the positive cognition is strong.
Control condition - No intervention
NO INTERVENTIONThe control group will follow routine daily activities
Interventions
Eye movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (as described in the 8-phases protocol), administered both online or in presence.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participants aged 18 to 75 years
- Participants experienced a full COVID19 pandemic-related quarantine during red zones of the second and third lockdowns in Italy
- Participants have reasonable comprehension of spoken and written Italian language
- Participants have an adequate understanding of Italian
You may not qualify if:
- Concurrent enrollment in other intervention trials
- Participants that already experienced EMDR therapy in the past
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Pisa
Pisa, 56126, Italy
Related Publications (1)
Miccoli M, Poli A. Randomized trial on the effects of an EMDR intervention on traumatic and obsessive symptoms during the COVID-19 quarantine: a psychometric study. Front Psychiatry. 2024 Jun 26;15:1369216. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1369216. eCollection 2024.
PMID: 38988736DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Andrea Poli, PsyD
University of Pisa
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Research Fellow
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 23, 2023
First Posted
November 1, 2023
Study Start
October 10, 2021
Primary Completion
April 30, 2022
Study Completion
April 30, 2022
Last Updated
April 16, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
Raw data are available on request.