NCT03218046

Brief Summary

Tinnitus may be considered as a form of phantom auditory sensation and as such parallels may be drawn with other forms of phantom sensation, such as the sensation of pain in an amputated limb (phantom limb pain). There has been recent interest in the use of eye movement therapies to treat patients with phantom sensations such as these. The role of eye movements in the propagation and maintenance of tinnitus has also been well established. The main aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of an established form of eye movement therapy called Eye Movement Desensitisation and Reprocessing (EMDR). This research is important as EMDR has produced encouraging results for other forms of phantom sensation and current models of tinnitus fit well with the proposed mode of action of EMDR. Tinnitus is very prevalent in our population and is often associated with significant discomfort; however, there is a severe lack of effective treatments based on well designed clinical trials. The investigator wishes to assess the usefulness of EMDR against the current treatment that is available in many institutions including the Investigator's own. The Investigator intends to recruit 15-30 patients initially to run a pilot study, before embarking on a larger scale study. The Investigator hopes that this pilot study will run over the course of a year. If this study demonstrates a significant improvement in tinnitus in patient undergoing EMDR, this will be an important step forward not only for treating patients with this disorder, but also for understanding the pathways that initiate, propagate and maintain tinnitus perception.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
23

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2016

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2016

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 20, 2016

Completed
7 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 14, 2017

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 31, 2017

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 2, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

July 29, 2019

Status Verified

July 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

December 20, 2016

Last Update Submit

July 25, 2019

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in tinnitus handicap inventory score

    Tinnitus questionnaire

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Beck Depression Inventory (T0, T1, T2)

    6 months

  • Beck Anxiety Inventory(T0, T1, T2)

    6 months

  • Posttraumatic Stress Diagnostic Scale (T0, T1, T2)

    6 months

  • Pure Tone Audiogram (T0).

    6 months

  • Psychoacoustic parameters: (T0, T1, T2) a. Intensity - Tinnitus loudness estimate using a VAS b. Loudness Discomfort Level (LDL) at 250-8000Hz

    6 months

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

EMDR group

EXPERIMENTAL

This is the treatment arm that will receive EMDR therapy

Behavioral: EMDR

Interventions

EMDRBEHAVIORAL

Eye Movement Desensitisation and Reprocessing

EMDR group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • \- 1. 'Subjective Idiopathic Tinnitus', specifically 'Chronic Decompensated Tinnitus' with a THI score of 38 to 100.
  • \. Tinnitus for greater than 6 months duration. 3. Aged over 18 4. Willing to commit to a full course of EMDR therapy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital

Norwich, Norfolk, NR4 7UY, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (26)

  • Lockwood AH, Salvi RJ, Burkard RF. Tinnitus. N Engl J Med. 2002 Sep 19;347(12):904-10. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra013395. No abstract available.

    PMID: 12239260BACKGROUND
  • Noell CA, Meyerhoff WL. Tinnitus. Diagnosis and treatment of this elusive symptom. Geriatrics. 2003 Feb;58(2):28-34.

    PMID: 12596495BACKGROUND
  • Davis A, El Rafaie A. Epidemiology of tinnitus. In: Tyler RS, (ed). Tinnitus Handbook. San Diego: Singular, 2000; 1-23.

    BACKGROUND
  • McFerran DJ, Phillips JS. Tinnitus. J Laryngol Otol. 2007 Mar;121(3):201-8. doi: 10.1017/S0022215106002714. Epub 2006 Sep 25.

    PMID: 16995967BACKGROUND
  • Oren, E. and R. Solomon (2012).

    BACKGROUND
  • Flor H. Phantom-limb pain: characteristics, causes, and treatment. Lancet Neurol. 2002 Jul;1(3):182-9. doi: 10.1016/s1474-4422(02)00074-1.

    PMID: 12849487BACKGROUND
  • Shapiro F. Efficacy of the eye movement desensitization procedure in the treatment of traumatic memories. J Trauma Stress. 1989;2(2):199-223.

    BACKGROUND
  • Bisson J, Andrew M. Psychological treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;(3):CD003388. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003388.pub3.

    PMID: 17636720BACKGROUND
  • Shapiro F. Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR): Basic Principles, Protocols, and Procedures, 2nd Edition. 2001. The Guilford Press.

    BACKGROUND
  • Dyck MJ. A proposal for a conditioning model of eye movement desensitization treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1993 Sep;24(3):201-10. doi: 10.1016/0005-7916(93)90022-o.

    PMID: 7910613BACKGROUND
  • Kuiken D, Bears M, Miall D, Smith L. Eye Movement Desensitisation Reprocessing Facilitates Attentional Orienting. Imagination, Cognition and Personality. 2002;21:3-20.

    BACKGROUND
  • Hassard A. Reverse learning and the physiological basis of eye movement desensitization. Med Hypotheses. 1996 Oct;47(4):277-82. doi: 10.1016/s0306-9877(96)90067-5.

    PMID: 8910876BACKGROUND
  • MacCulloch MJ, Feldman P. Eye movement desensitisation treatment utilises the positive visceral element of the investigatory reflex to inhibit the memories of post-traumatic stress disorder: a theoretical analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 1996 Nov;169(5):571-9. doi: 10.1192/bjp.169.5.571.

    PMID: 8932885BACKGROUND
  • Barrowcliff AL, Gray NS, MacCulloch S, Freeman TC, MacCulloch MJ. Horizontal rhythmical eye movements consistently diminish the arousal provoked by auditory stimuli. Br J Clin Psychol. 2003 Sep;42(Pt 3):289-302. doi: 10.1348/01446650360703393.

    PMID: 14565894BACKGROUND
  • Jastreboff PJ. Phantom auditory perception (tinnitus): mechanisms of generation and perception. Neurosci Res. 1990 Aug;8(4):221-54. doi: 10.1016/0168-0102(90)90031-9.

    PMID: 2175858BACKGROUND
  • National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2005). Post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD): The management of adults and children in primary and secondary care. London: NICE Guidelines. . http://www.oqp.med.va.gov/cpg/PTSD/PTSD_cpg/frameset.htm

    BACKGROUND
  • Ursano RJ, Bell C, Eth S, Friedman M, Norwood A, Pfefferbaum B, Pynoos JD, Zatzick DF, Benedek DM, McIntyre JS, Charles SC, Altshuler K, Cook I, Cross CD, Mellman L, Moench LA, Norquist G, Twemlow SW, Woods S, Yager J; Work Group on ASD and PTSD; Steering Committee on Practice Guidelines. Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with acute stress disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Nov;161(11 Suppl):3-31. No abstract available.

    PMID: 15617511BACKGROUND
  • van Rood, Y. R. and C. de Roos (2009).

    BACKGROUND
  • Farmer A, Rooney R, Cunningham JR. Hypothesized eye movements of neurolinguistic programming: a statistical artifact. Percept Mot Skills. 1985 Dec;61(3 Pt 1):717-8. doi: 10.2466/pms.1985.61.3.717.

    PMID: 4088761BACKGROUND
  • Wertheim EH, Habib C, Cumming G. Test of the neurolinguistic programming hypothesis that eye-movements relate to processing imagery. Percept Mot Skills. 1986 Apr;62(2):523-9. doi: 10.2466/pms.1986.62.2.523.

    PMID: 3503261BACKGROUND
  • Baguley DM, Phillips J, Humphriss RL, Jones S, Axon PR, Moffat DA. The prevalence and onset of gaze modulation of tinnitus and increased sensitivity to noise after translabyrinthine vestibular schwannoma excision. Otol Neurotol. 2006 Feb;27(2):220-4. doi: 10.1097/01.mao.0000172412.87778.28.

    PMID: 16436993BACKGROUND
  • Coad ML, Lockwood A, Salvi R, Burkard R. Characteristics of patients with gaze-evoked tinnitus. Otol Neurotol. 2001 Sep;22(5):650-4. doi: 10.1097/00129492-200109000-00016.

    PMID: 11568674BACKGROUND
  • Biggs ND, Ramsden RT. Gaze-evoked tinnitus following acoustic neuroma resection: a de-afferentation plasticity phenomenon? Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2002 Oct;27(5):338-43. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.2002.00591.x.

    PMID: 12383293BACKGROUND
  • Lockwood AH, Wack DS, Burkard RF, Coad ML, Reyes SA, Arnold SA, Salvi RJ. The functional anatomy of gaze-evoked tinnitus and sustained lateral gaze. Neurology. 2001 Feb 27;56(4):472-80. doi: 10.1212/wnl.56.4.472.

    PMID: 11222790BACKGROUND
  • Husain FT. Neural network models of tinnitus. Prog Brain Res. 2007;166:125-40. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(07)66011-7.

    PMID: 17956777BACKGROUND
  • Moller AR. Pathophysiology of tinnitus. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1984 Jan-Feb;93(1 Pt 1):39-44.

    PMID: 6367601BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Tinnitus

Interventions

Eye Movement Desensitization Reprocessing

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Hearing DisordersEar DiseasesOtorhinolaryngologic DiseasesSensation DisordersNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Desensitization, PsychologicBehavior TherapyPsychotherapyBehavioral Disciplines and Activities

Study Officials

  • John Phillips

    Clinical Research and Trials Unit (Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital, UK)

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Research Services Manager

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 20, 2016

First Posted

July 14, 2017

Study Start

July 1, 2016

Primary Completion

August 31, 2017

Study Completion

October 2, 2018

Last Updated

July 29, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-07

Locations