The Effect of External Pressure Applı̇ed to the Palm on Labor Paı̇n and Childbirth Experı̇ence
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The study was carried out to evaluate the effect of external pressure applied to the palm on labor pain and childbirth experience.The sample of the randomized controlled study consisted of 60 nulliparous (30 in the experimental group and 30 in the control group) pregnant women who presented to Zeynep Kamil Gynecology and Pediatrics Training and Research Hospital between April and June 2020 to give birth and met the research conditions. The Descriptive Information Form, Follow-Up Form Related to Labor Action, Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were used in data collection. During the 5-6 cm, 7-8 cm, and 9-10 cm cervical dilatation stages of the labor process, palm external pressure was applied to the pregnant women in the experimental group, while standard midwifery care was provided to the pregnant women in the control group. The VAS was applied to both groups at admission to the hospital, before and after the 5-6 cm, 7-8 cm, and 9-10 cm cervical dilatation stages, and also at the 30th minute postpartum. Data were analyzed Statistical Package for Social Sciences 24.0 program using number, percentage, mean, standard deviation, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Levene's test and independent samples t-test, one-way ANOVA test, analysis of variance, and chi-square test. In all analyses, p\<0.05 values will be considered statistically significant.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 30, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 4, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 30, 2023
CompletedOctober 30, 2023
October 1, 2023
2 months
October 4, 2023
October 27, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Level of labor pain will be measured with VAS.
(min:0, max:10)
30 minutes
The Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ)
At the 30th minute postpartum
Study Arms (2)
Experimental Group
EXPERIMENTALInformation about applying external pressure to the palm was provided to the pregnant women in the experimental group. The researcher practically explained how, when and for how long to apply external pressure to the palm. The researcher introduced the comb to be used in the application of external pressure to the palm, and the application stage of the study was started.
Control Group
NO INTERVENTIONRoutine midwifery care and services applied to all pregnant women in the hospital were provided to the participants in the control group.
Interventions
During the 5-6 cm, 7-8 cm, and 9-10 cm cervical dilatation stages of the labor process, palm external pressure was applied to the pregnant women in the experimental group.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Being aged between 18-35 years
- Being a nulliparous pregnant woman
- Being pregnant at term (between the 37th and 42nd weeks of gestation)
- Expecting the vaginal delivery
- Being in singleton and vertex presentation
- The weight of the fetus between 2500-4000 g
- Having had an uncomplicated pregnancy process for the pregnant woman and the fetus
- Being in the latent phase (cervical dilatation below 4 cm)
You may not qualify if:
- Having high-risk pregnancy
- Having any disease and disability related to the hand and palm
- Having any health problem preventing communication
- Being a pregnant woman in need of analgesics
- Pregnant women to whom non-pharmacological methods were applied to relieve pain
- Undergoing cesarean section due to possible indication
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa
Istanbul, 34500, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (16)
Abdul-Sattar Khudhur Ali S, Mirkhan Ahmed H. Effect of Change in Position and Back Massage on Pain Perception during First Stage of Labor. Pain Manag Nurs. 2018 Jun;19(3):288-294. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2018.01.006. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
PMID: 29680213BACKGROUNDACOG Committee Opinion No. 766: Approaches to Limit Intervention During Labor and Birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Feb;133(2):e164-e173. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003074.
PMID: 30575638BACKGROUNDBijur PE, Silver W, Gallagher EJ. Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain. Acad Emerg Med. 2001 Dec;8(12):1153-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb01132.x.
PMID: 11733293BACKGROUNDBodian CA, Freedman G, Hossain S, Eisenkraft JB, Beilin Y. The visual analog scale for pain: clinical significance in postoperative patients. Anesthesiology. 2001 Dec;95(6):1356-61. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200112000-00013.
PMID: 11748392BACKGROUNDChaillet N, Belaid L, Crochetiere C, Roy L, Gagne GP, Moutquin JM, Rossignol M, Dugas M, Wassef M, Bonapace J. Nonpharmacologic approaches for pain management during labor compared with usual care: a meta-analysis. Birth. 2014 Jun;41(2):122-37. doi: 10.1111/birt.12103. Epub 2014 Apr 25.
PMID: 24761801BACKGROUNDDencker A, Taft C, Bergqvist L, Lilja H, Berg M. Childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ): development and evaluation of a multidimensional instrument. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010 Dec 10;10:81. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-81.
PMID: 21143961BACKGROUNDJones L, Othman M, Dowswell T, Alfirevic Z, Gates S, Newburn M, Jordan S, Lavender T, Neilson JP. Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;2012(3):CD009234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009234.pub2.
PMID: 22419342BACKGROUNDLang AJ, Sorrell JT, Rodgers CS, Lebeck MM. Anxiety sensitivity as a predictor of labor pain. Eur J Pain. 2006 Apr;10(3):263-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.05.001. Epub 2005 Jun 28.
PMID: 15987671BACKGROUNDMyles PS. The pain visual analog scale: linear or nonlinear? Anesthesiology. 2004 Mar;100(3):744; author reply 745. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200403000-00042. No abstract available.
PMID: 15108996BACKGROUNDSmith CA, Levett KM, Collins CT, Jones L. Massage, reflexology and other manual methods for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 15;(2):CD009290. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009290.pub2.
PMID: 22336862BACKGROUNDSoriano-Vidal FJ, Oliver-Roig A, Cabrero-Garcia J, Congost-Maestre N, Dencker A, Richart-Martinez M. The Spanish version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ-E): reliability and validity assessment. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Nov 24;16(1):372. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1100-z.
PMID: 27884123BACKGROUNDWHO recommendations: Intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK513809/
PMID: 30070803BACKGROUNDHamidzadeh A, Shahpourian F, Orak RJ, Montazeri AS, Khosravi A. Effects of LI4 acupressure on labor pain in the first stage of labor. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2012 Mar-Apr;57(2):133-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2011.00138.x. Epub 2012 Mar 2.
PMID: 22432484RESULTRosseland LA, Reme SE, Simonsen TB, Thoresen M, Nielsen CS, Gran ME. Are labor pain and birth experience associated with persistent pain and postpartum depression? A prospective cohort study. Scand J Pain. 2020 Jul 28;20(3):591-602. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2020-0025.
PMID: 32469334RESULTSehhatie-Shafaie F, Kazemzadeh R, Amani F, Heshmat R. The effect of acupressure on sanyinjiao and hugo points on labor pain in nulliparous women: a randomized clinical trial. J Caring Sci. 2013 Jun 1;2(2):123-9. doi: 10.5681/jcs.2013.015. eCollection 2013 Jun.
PMID: 25276718RESULTSmith CA, Levett KM, Collins CT, Dahlen HG, Ee CC, Suganuma M. Massage, reflexology and other manual methods for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 28;3(3):CD009290. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009290.pub3.
PMID: 29589380RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Emine Nur Çalımlı Celep
Researcher Assistant
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 4, 2023
First Posted
October 30, 2023
Study Start
April 30, 2020
Primary Completion
June 30, 2020
Study Completion
December 30, 2020
Last Updated
October 30, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share