NCT06106867

Brief Summary

The study was carried out to evaluate the effect of external pressure applied to the palm on labor pain and childbirth experience.The sample of the randomized controlled study consisted of 60 nulliparous (30 in the experimental group and 30 in the control group) pregnant women who presented to Zeynep Kamil Gynecology and Pediatrics Training and Research Hospital between April and June 2020 to give birth and met the research conditions. The Descriptive Information Form, Follow-Up Form Related to Labor Action, Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were used in data collection. During the 5-6 cm, 7-8 cm, and 9-10 cm cervical dilatation stages of the labor process, palm external pressure was applied to the pregnant women in the experimental group, while standard midwifery care was provided to the pregnant women in the control group. The VAS was applied to both groups at admission to the hospital, before and after the 5-6 cm, 7-8 cm, and 9-10 cm cervical dilatation stages, and also at the 30th minute postpartum. Data were analyzed Statistical Package for Social Sciences 24.0 program using number, percentage, mean, standard deviation, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Levene's test and independent samples t-test, one-way ANOVA test, analysis of variance, and chi-square test. In all analyses, p\<0.05 values will be considered statistically significant.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2020

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 30, 2020

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2020

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 30, 2020

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 4, 2023

Completed
26 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 30, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

October 30, 2023

Status Verified

October 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

October 4, 2023

Last Update Submit

October 27, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

external pressurelabor painchildbirth experiencenon-pharmacological methodmidwifery care

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Level of labor pain will be measured with VAS.

    (min:0, max:10)

    30 minutes

  • The Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ)

    At the 30th minute postpartum

Study Arms (2)

Experimental Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Information about applying external pressure to the palm was provided to the pregnant women in the experimental group. The researcher practically explained how, when and for how long to apply external pressure to the palm. The researcher introduced the comb to be used in the application of external pressure to the palm, and the application stage of the study was started.

Procedure: External pressure to the palm

Control Group

NO INTERVENTION

Routine midwifery care and services applied to all pregnant women in the hospital were provided to the participants in the control group.

Interventions

During the 5-6 cm, 7-8 cm, and 9-10 cm cervical dilatation stages of the labor process, palm external pressure was applied to the pregnant women in the experimental group.

Experimental Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 35 Years
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility Detailspregnant women
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Being aged between 18-35 years
  • Being a nulliparous pregnant woman
  • Being pregnant at term (between the 37th and 42nd weeks of gestation)
  • Expecting the vaginal delivery
  • Being in singleton and vertex presentation
  • The weight of the fetus between 2500-4000 g
  • Having had an uncomplicated pregnancy process for the pregnant woman and the fetus
  • Being in the latent phase (cervical dilatation below 4 cm)

You may not qualify if:

  • Having high-risk pregnancy
  • Having any disease and disability related to the hand and palm
  • Having any health problem preventing communication
  • Being a pregnant woman in need of analgesics
  • Pregnant women to whom non-pharmacological methods were applied to relieve pain
  • Undergoing cesarean section due to possible indication

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa

Istanbul, 34500, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (16)

  • Abdul-Sattar Khudhur Ali S, Mirkhan Ahmed H. Effect of Change in Position and Back Massage on Pain Perception during First Stage of Labor. Pain Manag Nurs. 2018 Jun;19(3):288-294. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2018.01.006. Epub 2018 Apr 19.

    PMID: 29680213BACKGROUND
  • ACOG Committee Opinion No. 766: Approaches to Limit Intervention During Labor and Birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Feb;133(2):e164-e173. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003074.

    PMID: 30575638BACKGROUND
  • Bijur PE, Silver W, Gallagher EJ. Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain. Acad Emerg Med. 2001 Dec;8(12):1153-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb01132.x.

    PMID: 11733293BACKGROUND
  • Bodian CA, Freedman G, Hossain S, Eisenkraft JB, Beilin Y. The visual analog scale for pain: clinical significance in postoperative patients. Anesthesiology. 2001 Dec;95(6):1356-61. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200112000-00013.

    PMID: 11748392BACKGROUND
  • Chaillet N, Belaid L, Crochetiere C, Roy L, Gagne GP, Moutquin JM, Rossignol M, Dugas M, Wassef M, Bonapace J. Nonpharmacologic approaches for pain management during labor compared with usual care: a meta-analysis. Birth. 2014 Jun;41(2):122-37. doi: 10.1111/birt.12103. Epub 2014 Apr 25.

    PMID: 24761801BACKGROUND
  • Dencker A, Taft C, Bergqvist L, Lilja H, Berg M. Childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ): development and evaluation of a multidimensional instrument. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010 Dec 10;10:81. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-81.

    PMID: 21143961BACKGROUND
  • Jones L, Othman M, Dowswell T, Alfirevic Z, Gates S, Newburn M, Jordan S, Lavender T, Neilson JP. Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;2012(3):CD009234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009234.pub2.

    PMID: 22419342BACKGROUND
  • Lang AJ, Sorrell JT, Rodgers CS, Lebeck MM. Anxiety sensitivity as a predictor of labor pain. Eur J Pain. 2006 Apr;10(3):263-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.05.001. Epub 2005 Jun 28.

    PMID: 15987671BACKGROUND
  • Myles PS. The pain visual analog scale: linear or nonlinear? Anesthesiology. 2004 Mar;100(3):744; author reply 745. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200403000-00042. No abstract available.

    PMID: 15108996BACKGROUND
  • Smith CA, Levett KM, Collins CT, Jones L. Massage, reflexology and other manual methods for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 15;(2):CD009290. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009290.pub2.

    PMID: 22336862BACKGROUND
  • Soriano-Vidal FJ, Oliver-Roig A, Cabrero-Garcia J, Congost-Maestre N, Dencker A, Richart-Martinez M. The Spanish version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ-E): reliability and validity assessment. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Nov 24;16(1):372. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1100-z.

    PMID: 27884123BACKGROUND
  • WHO recommendations: Intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK513809/

    PMID: 30070803BACKGROUND
  • Hamidzadeh A, Shahpourian F, Orak RJ, Montazeri AS, Khosravi A. Effects of LI4 acupressure on labor pain in the first stage of labor. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2012 Mar-Apr;57(2):133-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2011.00138.x. Epub 2012 Mar 2.

  • Rosseland LA, Reme SE, Simonsen TB, Thoresen M, Nielsen CS, Gran ME. Are labor pain and birth experience associated with persistent pain and postpartum depression? A prospective cohort study. Scand J Pain. 2020 Jul 28;20(3):591-602. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2020-0025.

  • Sehhatie-Shafaie F, Kazemzadeh R, Amani F, Heshmat R. The effect of acupressure on sanyinjiao and hugo points on labor pain in nulliparous women: a randomized clinical trial. J Caring Sci. 2013 Jun 1;2(2):123-9. doi: 10.5681/jcs.2013.015. eCollection 2013 Jun.

  • Smith CA, Levett KM, Collins CT, Dahlen HG, Ee CC, Suganuma M. Massage, reflexology and other manual methods for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 28;3(3):CD009290. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009290.pub3.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Labor Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Emine Nur Çalımlı Celep

    Researcher Assistant

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 4, 2023

First Posted

October 30, 2023

Study Start

April 30, 2020

Primary Completion

June 30, 2020

Study Completion

December 30, 2020

Last Updated

October 30, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations