Endorphin at Labor Pain and Acupressure
The Impact of Different Acupressure Procedures Performed on the Hand During Labor on Endorphin Levels and Labor Pain Perception: A Randomised Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
140
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study was performed to determine the impact of different acupressure procedures, performed on women's hands during labor, on endorphin levels and labor pain perception. The sample consisted of 140 pregnant women. The study was conducted with three experimental groups and one control group, each including 35 pregnant women. Conventional acupressure and warm and cold acupressure procedures were performed on the Large Intestinal 4 energy meridian zone acupressure point of the experimental group. No procedures were performed on the women in the control group. Data were collected using a "Personal Information Form", "Labor Intervention Follow-up Form", "Visual Analog Scale" and "Verbal Category Scale". The comparison between the experimental and control groups indicated that the conventional acupressure procedure was effective in reducing labor pain and that the warm acupressure procedure increased endorphin levels.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 25, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 31, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 8, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 23, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 29, 2020
CompletedApril 29, 2020
April 1, 2020
6 months
April 23, 2020
April 28, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
labor pain
pain scale
through study completion, an average of 1month
endorphin levels
physiological parameter
through study completion, an average of 1month
Study Arms (4)
Warm Acupressure Procedure Group
EXPERIMENTALLatent phase Visual Analog Scale and Verbal Category Scale I given as pretest First venous blood sample taken Active phase The first warm acupressure procedure was performed for ten minutes on the Large Intestinal 4 energy meridian zone acupressure point on the non-dominant hand. This process was repeated three more times at one-hour intervals. Visual Analog Scale II and Verbal Category Scale II were measured at the end of the active phase Transition phase The second warm acupressure procedure was performed three times at one-hour intervals A 30-minute break was given Visual Analog Scale III and Verbal Category Scale III were performed Second venous blood sample taken
Cold Acupressure Procedure Group
EXPERIMENTALLatent phase Visual Analog Scale I and Verbal Category Scale I given as pretest First venous blood sample taken Active phase The first cold acupressure procedure was performed for ten minutes on the Large Intestinal 4 energy meridian zone acupressure point on the non-dominant hand. This process was repeated three more times at one-hour intervals. Visual Analog Scale II and Verbal Category Scale II were measured at the end of the active phase Transition phase The second cold acupressure procedure was performed three times at one-hour intervals A 30-minute break was given Visual Analog Scale III and Verbal Category Scale III were performed Second venous blood sample taken
Conventional Acupressure Group
EXPERIMENTALLatent phase Visual Analog Scale I and Verbal Category Scale I given as pretest First venous blood sample taken Active phase Conventional acupressure was performed for 30 minutes on the Large Intestinal 4 energy meridian zone acupressure point on the non-dominant hand. This process was repeated twice more at one-hour intervals. Visual Analog Scale II and Verbal Category Scale II were measured at the end of the active phase Transition phase The second conventional acupressure procedure was performed twice at one-hour intervals A 30-minute break was given Visual Analog Scale III and Verbal Category Scale III were performed Second venous blood sample taken
Control Group
NO INTERVENTIONLatent phase Visual Analog Scale I and Verbal Category Scale I given as pretest First venous sample taken Active phase No procedure other than the routine clinical practices were carried out. Visual Analog Scale II and Verbal Category Scale II were measured at the end of the active phase Transition phase No procedure other than the normal clinical routines was conducted Visual Analog Scale III and Verbal Category Scale III were performed. Second venous blood sample taken
Interventions
Acupressure is non-invasive, safe and effective.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Being a primipara
- Having intact membranes
- No skin diseases (such as urticaria...),
- No use of narcotic drugs
- Having a term pregnancy
- Having a single fetus at vertex position
- Planning to have vaginal delivery
- Having contractions and ongoing regular augmentation
- Having recent augmentation starting periods
- Being in the latent phase (0-3 cm dilatation)
- Having no history of high-risk pregnancy
- Not using analgesic drugs to reduce pain during delivery
- Having no systemic and neurologic diseases
- Having no contraction anomaly (hypotonic or hypertonic contractions)
You may not qualify if:
- Having any of the above criteria.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Health Research and Training Hospital of Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa University
Tokat Province, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Hava Özkan, PhD
Atatürk University Faculty of Health Science, Department of Midwifery,
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD, Academician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 23, 2020
First Posted
April 29, 2020
Study Start
April 25, 2019
Primary Completion
October 31, 2019
Study Completion
January 8, 2020
Last Updated
April 29, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
I want it published in a journal first.