Immersive Virtual Reality Satisfies the Women in Labor by Distracting Them From Their Labor Pain in Labor on Latent and Active Phase
Immersive Virtual Reality Improves Satisfaction In Laboring Women
1 other identifier
interventional
42
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a randomized control study with 42 laboring women allocated to virtual reality intervention and control groups. The objective of this study, to evaluate the effectiveness of immersive virtual reality in laboring women on patient satisfaction and pain relief. The satisfaction of patients was measured with a "Virtual reality satisfaction survey" which was prepared by the investigators. Pain levels were assessed by a virtual pain rating scale in the early and the active phase of labor in both groups.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 13, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 10, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 14, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 20, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 2, 2021
CompletedSeptember 2, 2021
August 1, 2021
7 months
July 20, 2021
August 26, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Virtual Reality Satisfaction Survey
Patient satisfaction with the use of VR was assessed by a "Virtual Reality Satisfaction Survey" 10 question survey prepared by our team: 0 being the lowest and 100 being the highest possible VR satisfaction score.
During the intervention
Wong-Baker Faces Pain
Pain scores both in early and active labor in each group were assessed using Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale. The scale shows a series of 6 faces ranging from a happy face at 0, or "no hurt", to a crying face at 5, which represents "hurts like the worst pain
During the intervention
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Patient satisfaction with overall labor and delivery experience was assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Zero indicates the most negative experience possible and 10 indicates the highest satisfaction possible.
A week after the labor
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
Pre-intervention, on admission
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
Pre-intervention, on admission
Study Arms (2)
Virtual Reality Group
EXPERIMENTALInvestigators used Oculus Quest All-in-one Virtual Reality Gaming Headset (128 GB) VR system. Before the intervention, the investigators introduced the equipment and instructed study participants on how to wear and activate the headsets. The laboring women who enrolled in the virtual reality group first wore the headsets in early labor (Cervical dilation 3 cm) for 20 minutes. The patients were offered to choose among several virtual environments including orange sunset, green meadows, black beginning, red savannah, blue deep, blue moon, blue ocean, white winter, and red fall. Cards printed out from the images of the Nature Trek application representing these novel immersion options were provided to the patients to help them pick up their preferred environment in advance. The second implementation of virtual reality headsets was after the epidural analgesia in the active phase of labor for another 20 minutes (Cervical dilation 6-7cm).
Control Group
NO INTERVENTIONFor participants randomized to the control group, virtual reality headsets were not used and the clinic's standard of care in laboring women was followed. Participants in this group filled out a visual pain rating scale both in the latent and active phases of labor.
Interventions
The laboring women who enrolled in the VR group were offered to choose among several virtual environments including orange sunset, green meadows, black beginning, red savannah, blue deep, blue moon, blue ocean, white winter, and red fall. Cards printed out from the screenshots of the Nature Trek application representing these novel immersion options were provided to the patients to help them pick up their preferred environment in advance.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years of age
- week gestation
- A singleton pregnancy
- With vertex presentation
- No history of chronic medical conditions
- Absence of pregnancy complications
- Admission with documented labor by cervical exam and regular uterine contractions.
You may not qualify if:
- Migraine
- Headache
- Dizziness
- Motion Sickness
- Epilepsy
- Psychiatric disorders
- Visual or auditory disabilities
- History of cesarean section
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Bahçeşehir Universitylead
- Acibadem Maslak Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Acibadem Maslak Hospital
Istanbul, Sariyer, 34457, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (34)
ACOG Committee Opinion #295: pain relief during labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jul;104(1):213.
PMID: 15229040BACKGROUNDAnim-Somuah M, Smyth RM, Cyna AM, Cuthbert A. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 21;5(5):CD000331. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub4.
PMID: 29781504BACKGROUNDNanji JA, Carvalho B. Pain management during labor and vaginal birth. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Aug;67:100-112. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.03.002. Epub 2020 Mar 7.
PMID: 32265134BACKGROUNDSmith CA, Levett KM, Collins CT, Armour M, Dahlen HG, Suganuma M. Relaxation techniques for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 28;3(3):CD009514. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009514.pub2.
PMID: 29589650BACKGROUNDMadden K, Middleton P, Cyna AM, Matthewson M, Jones L. Hypnosis for pain management during labour and childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 19;2016(5):CD009356. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009356.pub3.
PMID: 27192949BACKGROUNDSmith CA, Levett KM, Collins CT, Dahlen HG, Ee CC, Suganuma M. Massage, reflexology and other manual methods for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 28;3(3):CD009290. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009290.pub3.
PMID: 29589380BACKGROUNDDowswell T, Bedwell C, Lavender T, Neilson JP. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for pain relief in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;(2):CD007214. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007214.pub2.
PMID: 19370680BACKGROUNDMaani CV, Hoffman HG, Morrow M, Maiers A, Gaylord K, McGhee LL, DeSocio PA. Virtual reality pain control during burn wound debridement of combat-related burn injuries using robot-like arm mounted VR goggles. J Trauma. 2011 Jul;71(1 Suppl):S125-30. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31822192e2.
PMID: 21795888BACKGROUNDMosadeghi S, Reid MW, Martinez B, Rosen BT, Spiegel BM. Feasibility of an Immersive Virtual Reality Intervention for Hospitalized Patients: An Observational Cohort Study. JMIR Ment Health. 2016 Jun 27;3(2):e28. doi: 10.2196/mental.5801.
PMID: 27349654BACKGROUNDAtzori B, Lauro Grotto R, Giugni A, Calabro M, Alhalabi W, Hoffman HG. Virtual Reality Analgesia for Pediatric Dental Patients. Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 23;9:2265. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02265. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 30532720BACKGROUNDWalther-Larsen S, Petersen T, Friis SM, Aagaard G, Drivenes B, Opstrup P. Immersive Virtual Reality for Pediatric Procedural Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Hosp Pediatr. 2019 Jul;9(7):501-507. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2018-0249. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
PMID: 31160472BACKGROUNDFaruki A, Nguyen T, Proeschel S, Levy N, Yu J, Ip V, Mueller A, Banner-Goodspeed V, O'Gara B. Virtual reality as an adjunct to anesthesia in the operating room. Trials. 2019 Dec 27;20(1):782. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3922-2.
PMID: 31882015BACKGROUNDWang YL, Gao HX, Wang JS, Wang JH, Bo L, Zhang TT, Dai YL, Gao LL, Liu Q, Zhang JJ, Cai JM, Yu JQ, Li YX. Immersive virtual reality as analgesia for women during hysterosalpingography: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2020 Jan 20;21(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-4023-y.
PMID: 31959220BACKGROUNDHoffman HG, Richards TL, Coda B, Bills AR, Blough D, Richards AL, Sharar SR. Modulation of thermal pain-related brain activity with virtual reality: evidence from fMRI. Neuroreport. 2004 Jun 7;15(8):1245-8. doi: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000127826.73576.91.
PMID: 15167542BACKGROUNDBeck AT, Epstein N, Brown G, Steer RA. An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988 Dec;56(6):893-7. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.56.6.893. No abstract available.
PMID: 3204199BACKGROUNDBeck AT, Steer RA, Carbin MG. Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clinical Psychology Review. 1988.
BACKGROUNDShourab NJ, Zagami SE, Golmakhani N, Mazlom SR, Nahvi A, Pabarja F, Talebi M, Rizi SM. Virtual reality and anxiety in primiparous women during episiotomy repair. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2016 Sep-Oct;21(5):521-526. doi: 10.4103/1735-9066.193417.
PMID: 27904638BACKGROUNDFrey DP, Bauer ME, Bell CL, Low LK, Hassett AL, Cassidy RB, Boyer KD, Sharar SR. Virtual Reality Analgesia in Labor: The VRAIL Pilot Study-A Preliminary Randomized Controlled Trial Suggesting Benefit of Immersive Virtual Reality Analgesia in Unmedicated Laboring Women. Anesth Analg. 2019 Jun;128(6):e93-e96. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003649.
PMID: 31094789BACKGROUNDKist M, Bekemeyer Z, Ralls L, Carvalho B, Rodriguez ST, Caruso TJ. Virtual reality successfully provides anxiolysis to laboring women undergoing epidural placement. J Clin Anesth. 2020 May;61:109635. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.109635. Epub 2019 Oct 26. No abstract available.
PMID: 31662229BACKGROUNDAttanasio LB, McPherson ME, Kozhimannil KB. Positive childbirth experiences in U.S. hospitals: a mixed methods analysis. Matern Child Health J. 2014 Jul;18(5):1280-90. doi: 10.1007/s10995-013-1363-1.
PMID: 24072597BACKGROUNDKarlstrom A, Nystedt A, Hildingsson I. The meaning of a very positive birth experience: focus groups discussions with women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Oct 9;15:251. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0683-0.
PMID: 26453022BACKGROUNDDencker A, Bergqvist L, Berg M, Greenbrook JTV, Nilsson C, Lundgren I. Measuring women's experiences of decision-making and aspects of midwifery support: a confirmatory factor analysis of the revised Childbirth Experience Questionnaire. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Apr 6;20(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02869-0.
PMID: 32252679BACKGROUNDTuncalp Ӧ, Were WM, MacLennan C, Oladapo OT, Gulmezoglu AM, Bahl R, Daelmans B, Mathai M, Say L, Kristensen F, Temmerman M, Bustreo F. Quality of care for pregnant women and newborns-the WHO vision. BJOG. 2015 Jul;122(8):1045-9. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13451. Epub 2015 May 1. No abstract available.
PMID: 25929823BACKGROUNDLazzerini M, Mariani I, Semenzato C, Valente EP. Association between maternal satisfaction and other indicators of quality of care at childbirth: a cross-sectional study based on the WHO standards. BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 14;10(9):e037063. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037063.
PMID: 32928854BACKGROUNDJolles MW, de Vries M, Hollander MH, van Dillen J. Prevalence, characteristics, and satisfaction of women with a birth plan in The Netherlands. Birth. 2019 Dec;46(4):686-692. doi: 10.1111/birt.12451. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
PMID: 31524298BACKGROUNDHawkins JL. Epidural analgesia for labor and delivery. N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 22;362(16):1503-10. doi: 10.1056/NEJMct0909254. No abstract available.
PMID: 20410515BACKGROUNDAshagrie HE, Fentie DY, Kassahun HG. A review article on epidural analgesia for labor pain management: A systematic review. International Journal of Surgery Open. 2020;24:100-4.
BACKGROUNDFyneface-Ogan S, Mato CN, Anya SE. Epidural anesthesia: views and outcomes of women in labor in a Nigerian hospital. Ann Afr Med. 2009 Oct-Dec;8(4):250-6. doi: 10.4103/1596-3519.59580.
PMID: 20139548BACKGROUNDTulp MJ, Paech MJ. Analgesia for childbirth: modern insights into an age-old challenge and the quest for an ideal approach. Pain Manag. 2014 Jan;4(1):69-78. doi: 10.2217/pmt.13.63.
PMID: 24641345BACKGROUNDLee SL, Liu CY, Lu YY, Gau ML. Efficacy of warm showers on labor pain and birth experiences during the first labor stage. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2013 Jan-Feb;42(1):19-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2012.01424.x. Epub 2012 Nov 20.
PMID: 23167574BACKGROUNDGau ML, Chang CY, Tian SH, Lin KC. Effects of birth ball exercise on pain and self-efficacy during childbirth: a randomised controlled trial in Taiwan. Midwifery. 2011 Dec;27(6):e293-300. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2011.02.004. Epub 2011 Apr 3.
PMID: 21459499BACKGROUNDNieminen K, Stephansson O, Ryding EL. Women's fear of childbirth and preference for cesarean section--a cross-sectional study at various stages of pregnancy in Sweden. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(7):807-13. doi: 10.1080/00016340902998436.
PMID: 19488882BACKGROUNDEyi EGY, Mollamahmutoglu L. An analysis of the high cesarean section rates in Turkey by Robson classification. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Aug;34(16):2682-2692. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1670806. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
PMID: 31570019BACKGROUNDCarus EG, Albayrak N, Bildirici HM, Ozmen SG. Immersive virtual reality on childbirth experience for women: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Apr 23;22(1):354. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04598-y.
PMID: 35461248DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assoc.Prof. Dr. Selen Gür Özmen
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 20, 2021
First Posted
September 2, 2021
Study Start
November 13, 2020
Primary Completion
June 10, 2021
Study Completion
June 14, 2021
Last Updated
September 2, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-08