Dural Puncture Epidural Versus Combined Spinal Epidural With Epidural Volume Extension in Labor Analgesia
The Effects of Dural Puncture Epidural Versus Combined Spinal Epidural With Epidural Volume Extension Techniques on Birth Variables in Labor Analgesia
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Labor is the process where the cervix is prepared to allow the baby to pass from the uterine cavity to the outside world. In the ordinary course, it ends with spontaneous or instrumental vaginal delivery or cesarean section. Traditionally, the first stage in which the cervix is passively dilated in response to uterine contractions consists of the second stage in which the mother passes the baby through the vagina and the third stage, the exit of the placenta. In the first stage of labor, pain is caused by uterine contractions and pressure on the cervix. Pain is transmitted through the T10-L2 spinal nerves and is felt in the abdominal wall, waist, hips, or thighs. In the second stage, pain from the vagina and perineum is added to uterine pain. This pain is transmitted by the pudendal nerves through the S2-4 nerve roots. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of dural puncture epidural analgesia versus combined spinal-epidural analgesia with epidural volume extension on labor variables.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2020
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 16, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 21, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 7, 2021
CompletedFebruary 8, 2022
February 1, 2022
1 year
January 16, 2020
February 7, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
First Epidural top-up time
Time elapsed between the end of local anesthetic injection and the return of pain \>4 on the NPRS.
First 24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Sacral analgesia time
First 24 hours
Performance time
First 24 hours
Incidence of Side Effect
First 24 hours
Study Arms (2)
Dural puncture epidural
ACTIVE COMPARATOR2 µg/ml fentanyl + %0,125 bupivacaine (20 ml) to epidural
Combined spinal-epidural with epidural volume extension
ACTIVE COMPARATOR10 µg fentanyl + 2 mg bupivacaine to intrathecal 7.4 ml saline volume to epidural
Interventions
10 µg fentanyl + 2 mg bupivacaine to intrathecal 7.4 ml saline volume to epidural
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ASA I and II parturients
- Pregnant patients in active labor
- active labor with cervical dilation \< 5cm
- weeks of gestational age
- Pregnant women between the ages of 18 and 45
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who do not want to participate voluntarily in the study
- Pregnant women outside the age range of 18 - 45
- Pregnants other than Nullipar
- Patients with allergic reactions to anesthesia and analgesia drugs to be used
- Severe systemic disease (kidney, liver, pulmonary, endocrine, cardiac)
- Gestational comorbidity (preeclampsia, eclampsia, diabetes mellitus, etc.)
- Substance abuse history
- Chronic pain history
- Psychiatric problems and communication difficulties
- BMI\> 35 kg / m2
- Failure in neuraxial interventions
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Ataturk University
Erzurum, Yakutiye, 25100, Turkey (Türkiye)
Erzurum Regional Training Research Hospital
Erzurum, Yakutiye, 25100, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (3)
Contreras F, Morales J, Bravo D, Layera S, Jara A, Riano C, Pizarro R, De La Fuente N, Aliste J, Finlayson RJ, Tran DQ. Dural puncture epidural analgesia for labor: a randomized comparison between 25-gauge and 27-gauge pencil point spinal needles. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 May 22:rapm-2019-100608. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-100608. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 31118278BACKGROUNDChau A, Bibbo C, Huang CC, Elterman KG, Cappiello EC, Robinson JN, Tsen LC. Dural Puncture Epidural Technique Improves Labor Analgesia Quality With Fewer Side Effects Compared With Epidural and Combined Spinal Epidural Techniques: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesth Analg. 2017 Feb;124(2):560-569. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001798.
PMID: 28067707BACKGROUNDDoymus O, Aydin ME, Bedir Z, Tor IH, Ejder Tekgunduz S, Doymus G, Celik EC, Ahiskalioglu A. Epidural volume extension versus dural puncture epidural analgesia for labor: A prospective randomized study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Mar 7;104(10):e41691. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041691.
PMID: 40068075DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Muhammed En Aydin
Ataturk University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 16, 2020
First Posted
January 21, 2020
Study Start
February 1, 2020
Primary Completion
February 1, 2021
Study Completion
February 7, 2021
Last Updated
February 8, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share