Protocol Based Selective Imaging Versus Routine Computed Tomography or Ultrasound in Suspected Appendicitis
PROSECCO
1 other identifier
interventional
900
1 country
3
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare protocol based selective imaging to routine imaging in adult patients with suspected appendicitis. The main question\[s\] it aims to answer are:
- Does protocol based selective imaging using clinical scoring affect clinical outcome?
- Does protocol based selective observation combined with score based selective imaging affect clinical outcome? Participants will be randomized into three groups:
- Selective imaging based on Adult Appendicitis Score
- Selective observation based on Appendicitis Severity Score combined with selective imaging based on Adult Appendicitis Score
- Routine imaging using ultrasound and/or computed tomography Researchers will compare selective imaging groups separately with routine imaging to see if number of negative appendectomies or number of complicated appendicitis is not significantly increased.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2023
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 5, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 13, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 15, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2028
March 12, 2025
March 1, 2025
3.1 years
October 5, 2023
March 10, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Negative appendectomy
Number of negative appendectomies (surgical removal of non-inflamed appendix)
Within 30 days from randomization
Complicated appendicitis
Number of patients with complicated appendicitis (AAST grade 3 or higher)
Within 30 days from randomization
Secondary Outcomes (7)
histologically proven appendicitis
Within 30 days from randomization
CT scan
Within 30 days from randomization
Adverse events
Within one year from randomization
Appendicitis
Within 2 years from randomization
Quality of life (EQ-5D-5L index value)
During the first 30 days from randomization
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Routine imaging
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will have first abdominal ultrasound, and if findings are negative or inconclusive for appendicitis abdominal CT scan is made. If ultrasound is not available, CT scan can be the first imaging study. If appendicitis is found in the imaging study patient is scheduled for urgent laparoscopic appendectomy. Other patients are discharged or treated according to possible alternative diagnosis.
Adult Appendicitis Score based selective imaging
EXPERIMENTALAdult Appendicitis Score (AAS) is calculated as soon as possible. Patients with AAS 16 or higher are scheduled for urgent laparoscopic appendectomy. Patients with AAS 11- 15 will have abdominal imaging as in the group 1. If appendicitis is found in the imaging study patient is scheduled for urgent laparoscopic appendectomy. Patients with AAS 10 or less are discharged without imaging studies.
Appendicitis Severity Score based observation with selective imaging using Adult Appendicitis Score
EXPERIMENTALPatients with Adult Appendicitis Score (AAS) 10 or less are discharged without imaging studies. Patients with AAS 11 or more are managed based on Appendicitis Severity Score (ASS). ASS is used to identify patients with low risk of complicated disease. Patients with high ASS (\>4) are managed as patients in arm 2. Patients with low ASS (\<=4) begin observation protocol where patients can leave hospital and they are re-evaluated with repeated scoring after 12-24 hours from randomization. After re-scoring patients may be discharged if AAS is below 16 and decreasing and ASS is below 5 or if AAS is below 11. If AAS is 16 or higher or increasing, patients are scheduled for urgent laparoscopic appendectomy. After observation period, patients with decreasing AAS between 11-15 and ASS higher than 4 or patients with stable AAS between 11-15 are send for imaging study.
Interventions
Abdominal imaging is done selectively based on Adult Appendicitis Score
Observation based on Appendicitis Severity Score combined Adult Appendicitis Score based selective abdominal imaging
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \- Suspicion of appendicitis
You may not qualify if:
- Time from symptom onset over 72 hours
- Age \<18 years
- Pregnancy, ruled out by serum or urine HCG measurement in 18- to 49-year-old women
- CT-scan or ultrasound already done within the last 3 days (72 hours)
- Clinical suspicion of other disease or other reason to perform imaging study
- Recruited earlier to the same trial
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
HUS, Jorvi Hospital
Espoo, Finland
HUS, Meilahti Hospital
Helsinki, 00029, Finland
HUS, Hyvinkää Hospital
Hyvinkää, Finland
Related Publications (3)
Sammalkorpi HE, Mentula P, Leppaniemi A. A new adult appendicitis score improves diagnostic accuracy of acute appendicitis--a prospective study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2014 Jun 26;14:114. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-14-114.
PMID: 24970111BACKGROUNDLastunen KS, Leppaniemi AK, Mentula PJ. DIAgnostic iMaging or Observation in early equivocal appeNDicitis (DIAMOND): open-label, randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg. 2022 Jun 14;109(7):588-594. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac120.
PMID: 35482016BACKGROUNDAtema JJ, van Rossem CC, Leeuwenburgh MM, Stoker J, Boermeester MA. Scoring system to distinguish uncomplicated from complicated acute appendicitis. Br J Surg. 2015 Jul;102(8):979-90. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9835. Epub 2015 May 12.
PMID: 25963411BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Panu Mentula, MD
Helsinki University Central Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- M.D.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 5, 2023
First Posted
October 13, 2023
Study Start
November 15, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2028
Last Updated
March 12, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share