Study Stopped
Delayed/poor inclusion rate.
The Laparoscopic Appendicitis Score; a Multicenter Validation Study
APPLE
APPLE Study (APPendicitis and Laparoscopic Evaluation) Study; Multicenter Prospective Validation of the Laparoscopic APPendicitis (LAPP) Score
1 other identifier
interventional
342
1 country
1
Brief Summary
SUMMARY Rationale: A diagnostic laparoscopy is a frequently used method to confirm the diagnosis appendicitis. However until recently evidence-based laparoscopic criteria for determining appendicitis were not defined. If there is any doubt about the presence of appendicitis the appendix is usually removed. In a single centre prospective pilot study on 134 patients the investigators were able to define the Laparoscopic APPendicitis (LAPP) score. In the current study the investigators will validate the LAPP score in order to decrease the negative appendectomy rate by 50%. Eventually the score should lead to a decrease in morbidity. Objective: To decrease the negative appendectomy rate by 50%. Study design: A multicenter prospective validation study Study population: All patients, ≥18 years, operated with a diagnostic laparoscopy for the clinical suspicion appendicitis. Sample size calculation, performed by a statistician/ epidemiologist of the Trial Coordination Centre, showed the need to analyse 778 patients. Intervention (if applicable): Patients operated on appendicitis in 2008 and 2009 (n=843), were retrospectively analysed for negative appendectomies. This cohort will serve as the control group. In this control group no intervention was given, as the LAPP score was not yet defined. In the 778 prospective analysed patients, the LAPP score will be used during a diagnostic laparoscopy. With the LAPP score the investigators intend to halve the number of negative appendectomies. Main study parameters/endpoints: A decrease in the negative appendectomy rate from 9% to 5%. This decrease should not lead to an increase in missed appendicitis (occurring within 30 days), defined as requiring a surgical re-intervention or as an appendicitis or appendicular infiltrate on an ultrasound or CT-scan. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: The risk of implementation of the LAPP score is minimal. In theory, the use of the LAPP score might lead to an increase risk in missed appendicitis. This might lead to an increase in morbidity.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 6, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 8, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2016
CompletedJune 1, 2016
May 1, 2016
2.7 years
January 6, 2014
May 29, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Negative appendectomy
Either a histologically proven normal appendix or in case of no appendectomy a 3 months disease free clinical course.
3 months postoperatively
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Missed appendicitis
3 months
Study Arms (1)
LAPP score
OTHERUse of the LAPP score during a diagnostic laparoscopy.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients operated for the clinical suspicion of acute appendicitis that will undergo a diagnostic laparoscopy.
- Age ≥ 18 years.
- Written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Diagnostic laparoscopy and planned appendectomy for an appendectomy a froid.
- Primarily chosen for an open appendectomy.
- Not able to give informed consent (for example language barrier or legally incapable).
- Refused informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University Medical Center Groningenlead
- University of Groningencollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University Medical Center Groningen
Groningen, Provincie Groningen, 9700RB, Netherlands
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 6, 2014
First Posted
January 8, 2014
Study Start
September 1, 2013
Primary Completion
May 1, 2016
Last Updated
June 1, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-05