DIAgnostic iMaging or Observation in Early Equivocal appeNDicitis
DIAMOND
1 other identifier
interventional
185
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of the study is to evaluate whether patients with early equivocal appendicitis can be observed instead of immediate diagnostic imaging. Half of the patients are randomly assigned to observation group, while the other half will undergo diagnostic imaging. The hypothesis is that resolving appendicitis is common in these patients. Thus, in observation group there will be fewer patients with appendicitis diagnosis and observation reduces the use of diagnostic imaging and surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 7, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 19, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 9, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2021
CompletedAugust 25, 2021
August 1, 2021
4 years
April 7, 2016
August 24, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Appendicitis requiring surgery or other intervention
30 days from randomization
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Complicated appendicitis
30 days from randomization
Delayed appendicitis diagnosis
30 days from randomization
Number of diagnostic imaging studies needed
30 days from randomization and within 1 year after randomization
Appendicitis requiring surgery or other intervention
within 1 year after randomization
Negative appendectomy
30 days from randomization
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Observation
EXPERIMENTALClinical follow-up for at least 6-8 hours, after follow-up repeated laboratory tests and repeated clinical examination is done. Adult Appendicitis Score is calculated after observation to determine further actions. Observation is continued in patients with decreasing score. Patients with the same or higher score undergo diagnostic imaging (score 11-15) or laparoscopy (score 16 or higher). Diagnostic imaging is abdominal ultrasound first and if the result is inconclusive or negative for appendicitis abdominal computed tomography is done. Laparoscopic appendectomy is done for those patients with appendicitis in diagnostic imaging.
Diagnostic imaging
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients undergo abdominal ultrasound and if the result is inconclusive or negative for appendicitis patients will have abdominal computed tomography. Laparoscopic appendectomy is done for patients with appendicitis in diagnostic imaging.
Interventions
Abdominal ultrasound, followed by abdominal computed tomography when necessary
Observation for 6 to 8 hours. After observation period repeated clinical examination and repeated blood test for calculation of Adult Appendicitis Score is done.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Clinical suspicion of acute appendicitis
- Equivocal appendicitis defined by Adult Appendicitis Score: Score ≥11 and ≤15.
You may not qualify if:
- C-reactive protein \>99 mg/l
- Time from symptom onset over 24 hours
- Pregnancy
- Antibiotics given within last 24 hours
- Suspicion of other disease than appendicitis, that would require immediate interventions such as surgery, diagnostic imaging or gynecologic consultation
- Missing written informed consent
- Patient randomized earlier to the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Helsinki University Central Hospital, Meilahti Hospital
Helsinki, 00029, Finland
Related Publications (2)
Sammalkorpi HE, Mentula P, Leppaniemi A. A new adult appendicitis score improves diagnostic accuracy of acute appendicitis--a prospective study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2014 Jun 26;14:114. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-14-114.
PMID: 24970111BACKGROUNDLastunen KS, Leppaniemi AK, Mentula PJ. DIAgnostic iMaging or Observation in early equivocal appeNDicitis (DIAMOND): open-label, randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg. 2022 Jun 14;109(7):588-594. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac120.
PMID: 35482016DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Panu J Mentula, M.D. Ph.D.
Helsinki University Central Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- M.D.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 7, 2016
First Posted
April 19, 2016
Study Start
April 1, 2016
Primary Completion
April 9, 2020
Study Completion
April 30, 2021
Last Updated
August 25, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share