NCT06076239

Brief Summary

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of ESWT applied to trigger points on pain, function, and effusion in individuals diagnosed with shoulder impingement syndrome. Material and methods: This was a randomized controlled clinical trial with a total of 32 which were randomly divided into two equal groups (ESWT Group (EG), n = 16; Control Group (CG), n=16). The participants in the EG were given Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy to the trigger point of the patients with a trigger point in one of the supraspinatus, subscapularis and infraspinatus muscles for a total of 5 sessions in 3 weeks (2 sessions in the first week, 2 sessions in the second week, 1 session in the third week) in addition to conventional treatment while CG received only conventional treatments for five days per week for 3 consecutive weeks. The primary outcome was pain intensity Visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary measurements were Tendon thickness and effusion with Ultrasound, Range of motion (ROM), Manual muscle testing (MMT), Corbin posture analysis, Constant Murley Score (CMS), Arm Shoulder and Hand Problems Questionnaire (DASH). Supraspinatus tendon thickness and effusion of the cases included in the study were evaluated by ultrasonography before and after the treatment(3 weeks) by the same specialist physician who was blind to the groups. Normal joint range of motion by universal goniometer, muscle strength by manual muscle test, posture evaluation by Corbin posture analysis, pain evaluation by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), functional evaluation by Constant Murley Score (CMS), Arm Shoulder and Hand Problems Questionnaire (DASH) by physiotherapist It was evaluated before and after the treatment (3 weeks).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
32

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2022

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 3, 2022

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 24, 2022

Completed
6 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2022

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 3, 2023

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 10, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

October 10, 2023

Status Verified

October 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

October 3, 2023

Last Update Submit

October 7, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

extracorporeal shock wave therapyshoulder pain

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Pain intensity

    The Visual Analog Scale that is highly feasible for clinical research and practice to assess pain intensity was scored by means of a 10-cm long horizontal line ranging from (0 cm = no pain) at one end to (10 cm = maximum imaginable pain) at the other on which participants marked a point according to their subjective perception of pain

    3 week

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Thickness of supraspinatus tendon

    3 week

  • Effusion in shoulder

    3 week

  • Shoulder ROM (flexion,extension,abduction,adduction,internal rotation,external rotation)

    3 week

  • Shoulder muscle strength

    3 week

  • Corbin posture analyze

    3 week

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

ESWT Group

EXPERIMENTAL

The participants in the ESWT Group (n=16) were given Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy to the trigger point of the patients with a trigger point in one of the supraspinatus, subscapularis and infraspinatus muscles for a total of 5 sessions in 3 weeks (2 sessions in the first week, 2 sessions in the second week, 1 session in the third week) in addition to conventional treatment.1000 pulses to the trigger point of the patients with a trigger point in one of the supraspinatus, subscapularis and infraspinatus muscles, 500 pulses to the surrounding area, 2 bars, ESWT (GYMNMA Shockmaster 500) was applied for a total of 5 sessions in 3 weeks at 10 Hz, medium energy level (\<0.28 mJ/mm2).

Other: ESWT Group

Control Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Control group (n=16) received only conventional treatment for five days per week for 3 consecutive weeks. Conventional treatment includes Ultrasound therapy(Gymna Pulson200) (1 mHz. treatment dose average 1.5 w/cm², intermittent with a small head (50%), 5 minutes around the glenohumeral joint of the cases in both groups participating in the study; at an intensity that the patient can tolerate, covering the painful area TENS applied (modified biphasic asymmetric pulse, and it was set to a pulse width of 100 μs and a frequency of 100 Hz, 20 min,) (Hometech ht 66b); hotpack and exercises (posterior capsule stretching, wand exercises, mobilization approximately 60 minutes of conventional treatment consisting of exercises and shoulder isometric exercises) was applied once a day, 5 times a week in both groups.

Other: ESWT GroupOther: Control Group

Interventions

EG were given Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy to the trigger point of the patients with a trigger point in one of the supraspinatus, subscapularis and infraspinatus muscles for a total of 5 sessions in 3 weeks (2 sessions in the first week, 2 sessions in the second week, 1 session in the third week) in addition to conventional treatment. 1000 pulses to the trigger point of the patients with a trigger point in one of the supraspinatus, subscapularis and infraspinatus muscles, 500 pulses to the surrounding area, 2 bars, ESWT (GYMNMA Shockmaster 500) was applied for a total of 5 sessions in 3 weeks at 10 Hz, medium energy level (\<0.28 mJ/mm2).

Also known as: EG
Control GroupESWT Group

Both EG and CG were given conventional treatment.Conventional treatment is consist of Ultrasound therapy (Gymna Pulson200) (1 mHz. treatment dose average 1.5 w/cm², intermittent with a small head (50%), 5 minutes (45)) around the glenohumeral joint of the cases in both groups participating in the study; TENS applied at an intensity that the patient can tolerate, covering the painful area (modified biphasic asymmetric pulse, and it was set to a pulse width of 100 μs and a frequency of 100 Hz, 20 min,) (Hometech ht 66b); hotpack and exercises (posterior capsule stretching, wand exercises, mobilization approximately 60 minutes of conventional treatment consisting of exercises and shoulder isometric exercises) was applied once a day, 5 times a week in both groups.

Also known as: CG
Control Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Having an active trigger point in the infraspinatus, supraspinatus, subscapularis muscles.
  • Positive impingement tests such as Hawkings, Neer and Jobe test, 60°-120° painful arc of motion are positive.
  • who were diagnosed with impingement syndrome by ultrasonography (USG) and clinical examination.

You may not qualify if:

  • patients with severe dementia or psychiatric disease,
  • diabetic patients with sensory problems,
  • and a history of malignancy.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Private Olympos Hospital

Antalya, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Shoulder Impingement SyndromeShoulder Pain

Interventions

Control Groups

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Joint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesShoulder InjuriesWounds and InjuriesArthralgiaPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Epidemiologic Research DesignEpidemiologic MethodsInvestigative TechniquesResearch DesignMethods

Study Officials

  • Seçil Özkurt, Phd

    İstanbul Arel University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Supraspinatus tendon thickness and effusion of the cases included in the study were evaluated by ultrasonography before and after the study by the same specialist physician who was blind to the groups.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The participants in the Experimental Group were given Extra Corporeal Shockwave therapy to the trigger point of the patients with a trigger point in one of the supraspinatus, subscapularis and infraspinatus muscles for a total of 5 sessions in 3 weeks (2 sessions in the first week, 2 sessions in the second week, 1 session in the third week) in addition to conventional treatments , while Control group received only conventional treatments for five days per week for 3 consecutive weeks
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Asst. Prof. Dr.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 3, 2023

First Posted

October 10, 2023

Study Start

March 3, 2022

Primary Completion

June 24, 2022

Study Completion

June 30, 2022

Last Updated

October 10, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-10

Locations