Effect of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in Impingement Syndrome
ESWT
Effect of ESWT Applied on the Trigger Point on Pain Function and Effusion in Individuals With Shoulder Impingement Syndrome
1 other identifier
interventional
32
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of ESWT applied to trigger points on pain, function, and effusion in individuals diagnosed with shoulder impingement syndrome. Material and methods: This was a randomized controlled clinical trial with a total of 32 which were randomly divided into two equal groups (ESWT Group (EG), n = 16; Control Group (CG), n=16). The participants in the EG were given Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy to the trigger point of the patients with a trigger point in one of the supraspinatus, subscapularis and infraspinatus muscles for a total of 5 sessions in 3 weeks (2 sessions in the first week, 2 sessions in the second week, 1 session in the third week) in addition to conventional treatment while CG received only conventional treatments for five days per week for 3 consecutive weeks. The primary outcome was pain intensity Visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary measurements were Tendon thickness and effusion with Ultrasound, Range of motion (ROM), Manual muscle testing (MMT), Corbin posture analysis, Constant Murley Score (CMS), Arm Shoulder and Hand Problems Questionnaire (DASH). Supraspinatus tendon thickness and effusion of the cases included in the study were evaluated by ultrasonography before and after the treatment(3 weeks) by the same specialist physician who was blind to the groups. Normal joint range of motion by universal goniometer, muscle strength by manual muscle test, posture evaluation by Corbin posture analysis, pain evaluation by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), functional evaluation by Constant Murley Score (CMS), Arm Shoulder and Hand Problems Questionnaire (DASH) by physiotherapist It was evaluated before and after the treatment (3 weeks).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 3, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 24, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 3, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 10, 2023
CompletedOctober 10, 2023
October 1, 2023
4 months
October 3, 2023
October 7, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain intensity
The Visual Analog Scale that is highly feasible for clinical research and practice to assess pain intensity was scored by means of a 10-cm long horizontal line ranging from (0 cm = no pain) at one end to (10 cm = maximum imaginable pain) at the other on which participants marked a point according to their subjective perception of pain
3 week
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Thickness of supraspinatus tendon
3 week
Effusion in shoulder
3 week
Shoulder ROM (flexion,extension,abduction,adduction,internal rotation,external rotation)
3 week
Shoulder muscle strength
3 week
Corbin posture analyze
3 week
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
ESWT Group
EXPERIMENTALThe participants in the ESWT Group (n=16) were given Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy to the trigger point of the patients with a trigger point in one of the supraspinatus, subscapularis and infraspinatus muscles for a total of 5 sessions in 3 weeks (2 sessions in the first week, 2 sessions in the second week, 1 session in the third week) in addition to conventional treatment.1000 pulses to the trigger point of the patients with a trigger point in one of the supraspinatus, subscapularis and infraspinatus muscles, 500 pulses to the surrounding area, 2 bars, ESWT (GYMNMA Shockmaster 500) was applied for a total of 5 sessions in 3 weeks at 10 Hz, medium energy level (\<0.28 mJ/mm2).
Control Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORControl group (n=16) received only conventional treatment for five days per week for 3 consecutive weeks. Conventional treatment includes Ultrasound therapy(Gymna Pulson200) (1 mHz. treatment dose average 1.5 w/cm², intermittent with a small head (50%), 5 minutes around the glenohumeral joint of the cases in both groups participating in the study; at an intensity that the patient can tolerate, covering the painful area TENS applied (modified biphasic asymmetric pulse, and it was set to a pulse width of 100 μs and a frequency of 100 Hz, 20 min,) (Hometech ht 66b); hotpack and exercises (posterior capsule stretching, wand exercises, mobilization approximately 60 minutes of conventional treatment consisting of exercises and shoulder isometric exercises) was applied once a day, 5 times a week in both groups.
Interventions
EG were given Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy to the trigger point of the patients with a trigger point in one of the supraspinatus, subscapularis and infraspinatus muscles for a total of 5 sessions in 3 weeks (2 sessions in the first week, 2 sessions in the second week, 1 session in the third week) in addition to conventional treatment. 1000 pulses to the trigger point of the patients with a trigger point in one of the supraspinatus, subscapularis and infraspinatus muscles, 500 pulses to the surrounding area, 2 bars, ESWT (GYMNMA Shockmaster 500) was applied for a total of 5 sessions in 3 weeks at 10 Hz, medium energy level (\<0.28 mJ/mm2).
Both EG and CG were given conventional treatment.Conventional treatment is consist of Ultrasound therapy (Gymna Pulson200) (1 mHz. treatment dose average 1.5 w/cm², intermittent with a small head (50%), 5 minutes (45)) around the glenohumeral joint of the cases in both groups participating in the study; TENS applied at an intensity that the patient can tolerate, covering the painful area (modified biphasic asymmetric pulse, and it was set to a pulse width of 100 μs and a frequency of 100 Hz, 20 min,) (Hometech ht 66b); hotpack and exercises (posterior capsule stretching, wand exercises, mobilization approximately 60 minutes of conventional treatment consisting of exercises and shoulder isometric exercises) was applied once a day, 5 times a week in both groups.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Having an active trigger point in the infraspinatus, supraspinatus, subscapularis muscles.
- Positive impingement tests such as Hawkings, Neer and Jobe test, 60°-120° painful arc of motion are positive.
- who were diagnosed with impingement syndrome by ultrasonography (USG) and clinical examination.
You may not qualify if:
- patients with severe dementia or psychiatric disease,
- diabetic patients with sensory problems,
- and a history of malignancy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Private Olympos Hospital
Antalya, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Seçil Özkurt, Phd
İstanbul Arel University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Supraspinatus tendon thickness and effusion of the cases included in the study were evaluated by ultrasonography before and after the study by the same specialist physician who was blind to the groups.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Asst. Prof. Dr.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 3, 2023
First Posted
October 10, 2023
Study Start
March 3, 2022
Primary Completion
June 24, 2022
Study Completion
June 30, 2022
Last Updated
October 10, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-10