Heart Rate Variability in Early Prediction of a Noxic Brain Injury After Cardiac Arrest
HEAVENwARd
1 other identifier
observational
200
1 country
5
Brief Summary
Despite advances in post-resuscitation care of patients with cardiac arrest (CA), the majority of survivors who are treated after restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) will have sequelae of hypoxic-ischemic brain injury ranging from mild cognitive impairment to a vegetative state. Early prognostication in comatose patients after ROSC remains challenging. Recent recommendations suggest carrying out clinical and paraclinical tests during the first 72 h after ROSC, to predict a poor neurological outcome with a specificity greater than 95% (no pupillary and corneal reflexes, bilaterally absent N20 somatosensory evoked potential wave, status myoclonus, highly malignant electroencephalography including suppressed background ± periodic discharges or burst-suppression, neuron-specific enolase (NSE) \> 60 µg/L, a diffuse and extensive anoxic injury on brain CT/MRI), but with a low sensitivity due to frequent confounding factors. The heart rate variability (HRV) is a simple and non-invasive technique for assessing the autonomic nervous system function. In patients with a recent myocardial infarction, reduced HRV is associated with an increased risk for malignant arrhythmias or death. In neurology, reduced HRV is associated with a poor outcome in severe brain injury patients and allows to predict early neurological deterioration and recurrent ischemic stroke after acute ischemic stroke. A reduced HRV could be a sensitive, specific and early indicator of diffuse anoxic brain injury after CA. This multicenter prospective cohort study assesses the added value of early HRV (within 24h of ICU admission) for neuroprognostication after cardiac arrest.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Oct 2024
Typical duration for all trials
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 13, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 21, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 23, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 15, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 15, 2027
December 16, 2024
December 1, 2024
3.1 years
September 13, 2023
December 11, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Poor neurological outcome evaluated using the CPC score
The CPC (Cerebral Performance Category) score assesses neurological status after cardiac arrest on a scale of 1 to 5 (1 = conscious and normal; 2 = conscious with moderate disability; 3 = conscious with severe disability; 4 = coma or vegetative state; 5 = death). The CPC score will be dichotomized as follow: good neurological outcome for categories 1 and 2 and poor neurological outcome or death for categories 3, 4 and 5. The CPC score will be obtained at day-28 from an in-hospital visit if the patient is still hospitalized or by phone call if patient returned home.
At day-28
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Net reclassification index
At day-28
Brain death
At day-28
Days without limitation of life sustaining treatment
At day-28
Study Arms (1)
Post-cardiac arrest patients
Interventions
Holter monitor is fitted within 2h of ICU admission to acquire a 24-hour electrocardiogram recording
Eligibility Criteria
Comatose patients admitted in ICU after resuscitation from cardiac arrest
You may qualify if:
- Admitted in intensive care unit (ICU) after resuscitation from cardiac arrest (in-hospital or out-of-hospital)
- Coma (Glasgow score \< 8) after ROSC, requiring sedation and targeted temperature management for at least 24h
You may not qualify if:
- Dying patient (Limitation of life support techniques at admission to the ICU)
- Non-Sinus Rhythm
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women
- Patient under protection of the adults (guardianship, curators or safeguard of justice)
- Opposition by the trusted person or by the patient once he/she wakes up
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (5)
Brest University Hospital
Brest, Brittany Region, 29609, France
Nantes University Hospital
Nantes, Pays de la Loire Region, 44093, France
Marseille University Hospital
Marseille, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur Region, 13005, France
Ambroise Paré - Hartmann Private Hospital Group
Neuilly-sur-Seine, Île-de-France Region, 92200, France
Cochin Hospital
Paris, Île-de-France Region, 75014, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 13, 2023
First Posted
September 21, 2023
Study Start
October 23, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 15, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 15, 2027
Last Updated
December 16, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share