Effects of Nap Restriction on Preschoolers' Empathy, Prosocial Behaviors and Executive Function
1 other identifier
interventional
25
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Cross-sectional evidences suggest a relationship between early childhood sleep and cognitive as well as socio-emotional functions. However, the casual relation has not been fully revealed. The current study aims to perform a randomized lab-based crossover nap restriction study on preschoolers, to determine the effects of sleep restriction on preschoolers empathy, prosocial behaviors as well as executive functions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 7, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 6, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 6, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2023
CompletedJanuary 5, 2024
January 1, 2024
4 months
August 7, 2023
January 3, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Voltage of N2 and Late Positive Potential (LPP) components
Child brain electroencephalogram (EEG) signals were collected via a non-invasive electrical brain cap and a wireless signal amplifier during the Empathic for Pain Event-related Potential Paradigm. The paradigm presents 32 pairs of empathic pain-related pictures at each sleep intervention condition (e.g., a hand hit by a hammer). The children are asked to think about "How painful do you think the person in the picture feels?" while looking at each picture. After data processing, the voltages of N2 (i.e. the negative potential at approximately 200 ms poststimulus) and LPP (a protracted slow-wave component elicited by emotional stimuli) are output and compared across sleep conditions.
20 minutes after waking up from scheduled nap, or 20 minutes post nap restriction
Empathic pain rating
The Empathic for Pain Event-related Potential Paradigm presents 32 pairs of empathic pain-related pictures at each sleep intervention condition (e.g., a hand hit by a hammer). The children are asked to rate on "How pain do you think the person in the picture feels?" with the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating System. The Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating System includes 6 faces demonstrating painful expressions, scoring 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 points respectively, with higher scores representing higher levels of vicarious painful feelings. The mean scores of ratings are used to compare the empathy behavioral level across sleep conditions.
20 minutes after waking up from scheduled nap, or 20 minutes post nap restriction
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Executive function - behavior
20 minutes after waking up from scheduled nap, or 20 minutes post nap restriction
Executive function - EEG signal
20 minutes after waking up from scheduled nap, or 20 minutes post nap restriction
Emotional arousal
20 minutes after waking up from scheduled nap, or 20 minutes post nap restriction
Emotion regulation
20 minutes after waking up from scheduled nap, or 20 minutes post nap restriction
Prosocial behavior level
20 minutes after waking up from scheduled nap, or 20 minutes post nap restriction
Study Arms (1)
Nap rested and nap restriction
EXPERIMENTALThere are two conditions in the single-arm, that is, the nap rested condition and the nap restriction condition. The sequence of two conditions is randomized.
Interventions
There are 2 interventions in the single-arm, that is, the nap rested condition and the nap restriction condition. The sequence of nap intervention followed randomization.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- healthy, typically developing, Intelligence quotient (IQ) ≥ 85;
- never diagnosed with emotional-behavioral problems;
- sleeping on a regular daily schedule;
- reported napping three or more times every week, ≤ one nap in one day;
- able to fall asleep by themselves.
You may not qualify if:
- not able to fall asleep alone;
- travel beyond two time zones within 3 months of the study;
- use of medications influencing sleep or alertness;
- reported or diagnosed sleep problems (such as obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), narcolepsy, parasomnia, insomnia, etc.) ;
- history of neurodevelopmental diseases, including developmental delay, epilepsy, chronic medical conditions, lead poisoning and head injuries involving loss of consciousness;
- conceptual age \<35 weeks or \> 45 weeks;
- birth weight \< 2,500 grams;
- Children's Behaviors Checklist (CBCL) total score \> 70;
- a first-degree family history of diagnosed narcolepsy, psychosis or bipolar disorder.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Shanghai Children's Medical Center, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
Related Publications (6)
Miller AL, Seifer R, Crossin R, Lebourgeois MK. Toddler's self-regulation strategies in a challenge context are nap-dependent. J Sleep Res. 2015 Jun;24(3):279-87. doi: 10.1111/jsr.12260. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
PMID: 25394169BACKGROUNDRong T, Sun X, Zhang Z, Li W, Deng Y, Wang Z, Meng M, Zhu Q, Jiang Y, Zhao J, Zhang Y, Wang G, Jiang F. The association between sleep and empathy in young preschoolers: A population study. J Sleep Res. 2022 Aug;31(4):e13530. doi: 10.1111/jsr.13530. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
PMID: 34904310BACKGROUNDDecety J, Meidenbauer KL, Cowell JM. The development of cognitive empathy and concern in preschool children: A behavioral neuroscience investigation. Dev Sci. 2018 May;21(3):e12570. doi: 10.1111/desc.12570. Epub 2017 May 18.
PMID: 28523733BACKGROUNDRoth-Hanania R, Davidov M, Zahn-Waxler C. Empathy development from 8 to 16 months: early signs of concern for others. Infant Behav Dev. 2011 Jun;34(3):447-58. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2011.04.007. Epub 2011 May 20.
PMID: 21600660BACKGROUNDAdam N, Blaye A, Gulbinaite R, Delorme A, Farrer C. The role of midfrontal theta oscillations across the development of cognitive control in preschoolers and school-age children. Dev Sci. 2020 Sep;23(5):e12936. doi: 10.1111/desc.12936. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
PMID: 31894624BACKGROUNDBerger RH, Miller AL, Seifer R, Cares SR, LeBourgeois MK. Acute sleep restriction effects on emotion responses in 30- to 36-month-old children. J Sleep Res. 2012 Jun;21(3):235-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2011.00962.x. Epub 2011 Oct 11.
PMID: 21988087BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Fan Jiang, PhD
Shanghai Children's Medical Center
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Guanghai Wang, PhD
Shanghai Children's Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Developing Brain Lab
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 7, 2023
First Posted
September 6, 2023
Study Start
September 6, 2023
Primary Completion
December 31, 2023
Study Completion
December 31, 2023
Last Updated
January 5, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-01