HEalthy Aging Team Supported Home-care Services (HEAT-YASAM)
HEAT-YASAM
Does Healthy Aging Team-supported Home-care Services Pilot Program Reduce ED Visits? A Prospective before-and After-intervention Study
1 other identifier
observational
2,000
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Depending on the YASAM project which was established to home-visit evaluate community-dwelling older adults (80 years of age and over), we aimed to determine the prevalence (prevalence) of geriatric syndromes (dependence, frailty, malnutrition, depression, dementia, comorbidity burden, polypharmacy) in these individuals and to determine possible changes in the follow-up of the patients during the 2-year follow-up period. (HEAVEN trial)
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jun 2023
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 15, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 21, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 15, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2025
CompletedDecember 6, 2023
November 1, 2023
1.5 years
July 21, 2023
November 30, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (14)
Short term Healthy Aging status (mortality)
Outcomes were evaluated according to the national electronic database.
1-,3-,6- month
Short term Healthy Aging status (changes dependency )
Outcomes were evaluated according to the specific test Katz scales the 1 is minimum and 6 is maximum value for scale, and higher scores mean a better outcome, higher scores mean a better outcome for dependency)
1-,3-,6- month
Short term Healthy Aging status (changes in frailty level)
Outcomes were evaluated according to the specific test (Fraility via Clinical fraility scales the 1 is minimum and 9 is maximum value for scale, and higher scores mean a worse outcome).
1-,3-,6- month
Short term Healthy Aging status (changes in nutrition)
Outcomes were evaluated according to the specific test (MNA scale for nutritional status the 0 is minimum and 14 is maximum value for scale, and higher scores mean a better outcome).
1-,3-,6- month
Short term Healthy Aging status (changes in cognitive functions)
Outcomes were evaluated according to the specific test (cognitive functions with MMSE scale, the 0 is minimum and 30 is maximum value for scale, and higher scores mean a better outcome)
1-,3-,6- month
Short term Healthy Aging status (changes in mood)
Outcomes were evaluated according to the specific test (Outcomes were evaluated according to the specific test ( Yesavage for Depression status the 0 is minimum and 15 is maximum value for scale, and higher scores mean a worse outcome)
1-,3-,6- month
Short term Healthy Aging status (changes in mobility status)
Outcomes were evaluated according to the specific test (Chair stand test higher scores (\>13,5 seconds) means a worse outcome for mobility status).
1-,3-,6- month
Long term Healthy Aging status (mortality)
Outcomes were evaluated according to the national electronic database.
1- and 2- year
Long term Healthy Aging status (changes dependency )
Outcomes were evaluated according to the specific test Katz scales the 1 is minimum and 6 is maximum value for scale, and higher scores mean a better outcome, higher scores mean a better outcome for dependency)
1- and 2- year
Long term Healthy Aging status (changes in frailty level)
Outcomes were evaluated according to the specific test (Fraility via Clinical fraility scales the 1 is minimum and 9 is maximum value for scale, and higher scores mean a worse outcome.)
1- and 2- year
Long term Healthy Aging status (changes in nutrition)
Outcomes were evaluated according to the specific test (MNA scale for nutritional status the 1 is minimum and 14 is maximum value for scale, and higher scores mean a better outcome).
1- and 2- year
Long term Healthy Aging status (changes in cognitive functions)
Outcomes were evaluated according to the specific test (cognitive functions with MMSE scale, the 0 is minimum and 30 is maximum value for scale, and higher scores mean a better outcome).
1- and 2- year
Long term Healthy Aging status (changes in mood)
Outcomes were evaluated according to the specific test ( Yesavage scale for Depression status the 0 is minimum and 15 is maximum value for scale, and higher scores mean a worse outcome).
1- and 2- year
Long term Healthy Aging status (changes in mobility status)
Outcomes were evaluated according to the specific test (Outcomes were evaluated according to the specific test (Chair stand test higher scores (\>13,5 seconds) means a worse outcome for mobility status).
1- and 2- year
Interventions
Comprehensive Geriatric Assessments include functional status, fraility comorbidity, cognition, mental health, social support, nutrition, and geriatric syndromes
Eligibility Criteria
It is planned to include a total of 6000 individuals in the first phase, which is carried out in 20 centers throughout the province of Balıkesir (rural and central area) and whose coordination center is Balikesir Atatürk City Hospital. In the follow-ups, it is planned to include the whole cohort consisting of individuals over the age of 40 thousand 80, by increasing the number of teams.
You may qualify if:
- years and over older adults
- individuals giving verbal and written consent for the YASAM project
You may not qualify if:
- \<80 years older adults
- those who did not give verbal and written consent for the YASAM project
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Balikesir Ataturk City Hospital
Balıkesir, None Selected, 10100, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (2)
Katipoglu B, Kocyigit SE, Ergun U, Kocak AO, Aydeniz O, Mert I, Keskin SK. A Community-Based Integrated Healthy Aging Program at a Tertiary Hospital (YASAM) for the Oldest Old Participants May have the Potential to Reduce Emergency Admission: Preliminary Evidence from a Pre-Post-Intervention Study. J Emerg Med. 2025 May;72:112-120. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2024.12.009. Epub 2024 Dec 31.
PMID: 40316458DERIVEDKatipoglu B, Kocyigit SE. Impact of geriatric syndrome burden on healthcare services utilization and mortality among community-dwelling older adults: is it still too late to do something? Eur Geriatr Med. 2025 Jun;16(3):1055-1061. doi: 10.1007/s41999-025-01189-w. Epub 2025 Mar 22.
PMID: 40120075DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Bilal Katipoglu
Gulhane Training and Research Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 2 Years
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 21, 2023
First Posted
August 15, 2023
Study Start
June 15, 2023
Primary Completion
December 1, 2024
Study Completion
December 1, 2025
Last Updated
December 6, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-11