NCT06999512

Brief Summary

The worldwide incidence of hepatobiliary and pancreatic (HPB) cancers is dramatically increasing especially for pancreatic cancer. Increasing age is associated with increased cancer risk. In North America and Europe, most people who are diagnosed with cancer every year are aged 65 years or older. Hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma, intra hepatic and hilar cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder cancer and hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer allows better survival compared to other treatments. Similarly, pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is the standard of care in patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma and patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma located in the head of the pancreas. This results in an increasing number of elderly patients being evaluated for hepatic and pancreatic surgery. Major hepatectomy and PD are amongst the most invasive and complex procedures in general surgery with high rates of morbidity as well as negative impact on quality of life. Many studies have reported poor post-surgical outcomes in the elderly patients, especially related to co-morbidities that characterizes this population such as, polypharmacy, cognitive decline, depression and malnutrition. The age in elderly cancer patient is not just a number. The management of these patients should not be limited to oncological care, but it should be extended to different clinical domains including physical, cognitive, psychological, socioeconomic and environmental aspects. In this population, the risk of adverse postoperative outcomes is not adequately described by routine format of current preoperative evaluation, such as age, comorbidities and other traditional tests. Furthermore, the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is scarcely considered. The aim of CGA is to identify current health problems and to guide interventions thus reducing adverse outcomes and optimizing the functional status of older adults. Several trials have indeed shown that CGA and perioperative tailored interventions reduce morbidity and improve patient survival in other surgical disciplines. Similar data is lacking in both hepatic and pancreatic surgery. The hypothesis is that CGA with perioperative tailored interventions could reduce postoperative morbidity in elderly patients after major hepatectomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
526

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2

Timeline
56mo left

Started Sep 2025

Longer than P75 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

12 active sites

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress13%
Sep 2025Dec 2030

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 25, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 31, 2025

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2025

Completed
4.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2030

Expected
8 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2030

Last Updated

May 31, 2025

Status Verified

May 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4.6 years

First QC Date

April 25, 2025

Last Update Submit

May 30, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

patient over 70 yearshepatocellular carcinomaintra-hepatic and peri-hilar cholangiocarcinomagallbladder cancerperi-ampullary malignant tumorspancreatic adenocarcinomacolorectal liver metastasesMajor HepatectomyPancreaticoduodenectomy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Comprehensive Complex Index (CCI) value

    Comparison of the 90-day postoperative morbidity between patients in the interventional arm (receiving preoperative CGA and perioperative tailored geriatric interventions) and those in the control arm (receiving standard of care). CCI is based on the Clavien-Dindo classification, and takes into account all cumulative complications and receives values between 0 (no complication) and 100 (death).

    90 days after surgery

Secondary Outcomes (17)

  • Quality of life scale: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)

    at 3, 6 and 12 months post surgery

  • Quality of life scale EQ-5D-5L

    at 3, 6 and 12 months post surgery

  • Quality of life scale ELD14

    at 3, 6 and 12 months post surgery

  • Discharge status

    90 days after surgery

  • All-cause mortality at 90 days after surgery

    at 3 months post surgery

  • +12 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Control group

NO INTERVENTION

standard care follow up for the patient: Routine preoperative workup, routine postoperative follow-up

Interventional group

EXPERIMENTAL

standard care follow up for the patient: Routine preoperative workup, routine postoperative follow-up with Perioperative geriatric management: CGA, preoperative geriatric consultation, perioperative tailored intervention, postoperative geriatric follow-up

Procedure: Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment

Interventions

CGA: * Preoperative geriatric consultation * Perioperative tailored intervention if needed * Postoperative geriatric follow-up * M3 geriatric consultation

Interventional group

Eligibility Criteria

Age70 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsOlder Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients ≥ 70 years, with histologically proven or clinical diagnosis of HPB cancer among the following:
  • hepatocellular carcinoma
  • intra-hepatic and peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma
  • gallbladder cancer
  • peri-ampullary malignant tumors
  • pancreatic adenocarcinoma
  • colorectal liver metastases
  • Needing one of the following procedures:
  • Pancreaticoduodenectomy
  • Major Hepatectomy (≥ 3 hepatic segments)

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who have no access to the French health system.
  • Patient unable to sign informed consent.
  • Patients included in a double-blind randomized trial
  • Patients legally protected

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (12)

CHU Estaing

Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, France

Location

Hôpital Bicêtre

Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 94270, France

Location

Chru Lille - Hopital Huriez

Lille, 59000, France

Location

Hôpital Croix Rousse, HCL

Lyon, 69000, France

Location

Hôpital Edouard Herriot, HCL

Lyon, 69000, France

Location

Hôpital La Timone

Marseille, 13000, France

Location

Hôpital Cochin

Paris, 75014, France

Location

Institut Mutualiste Montsouris

Paris, 75014, France

Location

CHU ROUEN - Site Charles Nicolle

Rouen, 76000, France

Location

Hôpital Rangueil

Toulouse, 31000, France

Location

Hôpital Paul-Brousse

Villejuif, 94800, France

Location

Institut Gustave Roussy

Villejuif, 94800, France

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pancreatic NeoplasmsCarcinoma, HepatocellularGallbladder Neoplasms

Interventions

Geriatric Assessment

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Digestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsEndocrine Gland NeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesPancreatic DiseasesEndocrine System DiseasesAdenocarcinomaCarcinomaNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialNeoplasms by Histologic TypeLiver NeoplasmsLiver DiseasesBiliary Tract NeoplasmsBiliary Tract DiseasesGallbladder Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Data CollectionEpidemiologic MethodsInvestigative TechniquesHealth StatusDemographyPopulation CharacteristicsHealth Care Evaluation MechanismsQuality of Health CareHealth Care Quality, Access, and EvaluationEpidemiologic MeasurementsPublic HealthEnvironment and Public Health

Study Officials

  • Gabriella PITTAU, PhD

    Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Gabriella PITTAU, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: prospective comparative randomized controlled open label multicentric trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 25, 2025

First Posted

May 31, 2025

Study Start

September 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2030

Last Updated

May 31, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

there is no plan to make individual participant data (IPD) collected in this study available.

Locations