Evaluation of the Efficacy and Usability of Artificial Intelligence (ChatGPT) for Health Sciences Students
AIHSS
Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Usability of Artificial Intelligence (ChatGPT) for Health Sciences Students (AIHSS)
1 other identifier
interventional
26
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Crossover Randomized Control trial, in which subjects are randomly assigned to one of two groups: one (ChatGPT) receiving the intervention that is being tested, and the control group receiving usual online resources.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 4, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 27, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2023
CompletedFebruary 6, 2024
February 1, 2024
3 months
July 4, 2023
February 5, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
System Usability Scale (SUS) scores are 0-100,The average SUS score is 68.
Technology usability
within 24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Student's perception of artificial intelligence, questionnaire reviwed by experts, No recognised gold standard measurement for outcome.
within 24 hours
Study Arms (2)
Traditional Online tools Group
NO INTERVENTIONGroup B will serve as the control group in this study. Participants in this group will receive instructions on how to complete the assignment using traditional online tools available on the internet, without the use of artificial intelligence. They will have a timeframe of six days to complete the assignment using these conventional tools. Similar to participants in Arm 1, they will also be required to fill out a survey on technology usability, providing feedback on their experience with the online tools.
Artificial Intelligence (ChatGPT) Group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in Group A will be assigned to utilize ChatGPT as their tool to complete assignments. They will be given a period of six days to utilize artificial intelligence through ChatGPT for assignment completion. Along with the assignment instructions, participants will receive an ethical guideline and specific guidelines on how to effectively utilize ChatGPT. Once the intervention period is concluded, participants will be given a 24-hour window to complete a survey that assesses the usability of the technology. The survey aims to gather valuable feedback on the participants' experience and perception of using ChatGPT for their assignments. In addition, participants in Arm 1 will also be asked to fill out a survey regarding their perception of using artificial intelligence (AI) as an assistance tool to complete their assignments. This survey aims to gather insights into their thoughts, opinions, and attitudes towards utilizing AI in the learning process
Interventions
Participants in Group A will be assigned to utilize ChatGPT as their tool to complete assignments. They will be given a period of six days to utilize artificial intelligence through ChatGPT for assignment completion. Along with the assignment instructions, participants will receive an ethical guideline and specific guidelines on how to effectively utilize ChatGPT. Once the intervention period is concluded, participants will be given a 24-hour window to complete a survey that assesses the usability of the technology. The survey aims to gather valuable feedback on the participants' experience and perception of using ChatGPT for their assignments. In addition, participants in Arm 1 will also be asked to fill out a survey regarding their perception of using artificial intelligence (AI) as an assistance tool to complete their assignments. This survey aims to gather insights into their thoughts, opinions, and attitudes towards utilizing AI in the learning process.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Health Science students
- Must be registered for the course Chronic Health Conditions and Disability (HLTH 3503), Fall 2023.
You may not qualify if:
- Unable to provide informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Carleton Universitylead
- Université de Montréalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Carleton University
Ottawa, Canada
Related Publications (5)
Dwan K, Li T, Altman DG, Elbourne D. CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised crossover trials. BMJ. 2019 Jul 31;366:l4378. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4378.
PMID: 31366597RESULTLuna A, Casertano L, Timmerberg J, O'Neil M, Machowsky J, Leu CS, Lin J, Fang Z, Douglas W, Agrawal S. Artificial intelligence application versus physical therapist for squat evaluation: a randomized controlled trial. Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 13;11(1):18109. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97343-y.
PMID: 34518568RESULTLiu X, Rivera SC, Moher D, Calvert MJ, Denniston AK; SPIRIT-AI and CONSORT-AI Working Group. Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI Extension. BMJ. 2020 Sep 9;370:m3164. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3164.
PMID: 32909959RESULTZhou L, Bao J, Setiawan IMA, Saptono A, Parmanto B. The mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ): Development and Validation Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Apr 11;7(4):e11500. doi: 10.2196/11500.
PMID: 30973342RESULTVeras M, Dyer JO, Rooney M, Barros Silva PG, Rutherford D, Kairy D. Usability and Efficacy of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots (ChatGPT) for Health Sciences Students: Protocol for a Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Nov 24;12:e51873. doi: 10.2196/51873.
PMID: 37999958DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mirella Veras, PhD
Carleton University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Participants will be informed about the interventions they will be assigned to, ensuring transparency in the study. However, the investigator responsible for the allocation will be blinded to the group assignment of each participant, maintaining the integrity of the study design. To collect the outcomes, an individual external to the research team will be involved. This approach helps minimize potential bias and ensures the data collection process remains independent and unbiased.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 4, 2023
First Posted
July 27, 2023
Study Start
September 1, 2023
Primary Completion
December 1, 2023
Study Completion
December 1, 2023
Last Updated
February 6, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share