A Comparison of Clinical Simulation and Classical Learning for Airway Management in Medical Students
Title: A Comparison of Clinical Simulation and Classical Learning for Airway Management in Medical Students: a Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
102
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Multiple studies have shown clinical simulation benefits over classical learning method. Research on simulation of airway management has focused on endotracheal intubation training, while research on ventilation via facemask is scant. The investigators compared both learning methods regarding the acquirement of basic skills for airway management by medical students. Students in the clinical simulation group received a 3-hour training on airway management on the first day of their 28-day anesthesia rotation, while classical learning did not. On the last day of rotation, participants were evaluated based on a validated instrument of scores. Primary outcome was airway management scores. Secondary outcomes were rate of success of intubation and incidence of complications.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2012
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 20, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 20, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 20, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 6, 2017
CompletedMarch 7, 2017
March 1, 2017
1.5 years
March 1, 2017
March 6, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Airway management score
28 days
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Successful intubation rate
28 days
Incidence of complications
28 days
Study Arms (2)
Clinical Simulation
EXPERIMENTALClassical Learning
NO INTERVENTIONInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Last year medical students at Universidad de los Andes
- Over 18 year old
You may not qualify if:
- Previous elective anesthesia rotation
- Motor deficit affecting the upper limbs
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Anesthesiologist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 1, 2017
First Posted
March 6, 2017
Study Start
August 20, 2012
Primary Completion
February 20, 2014
Study Completion
June 20, 2014
Last Updated
March 7, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share