Clinical Validity of the Minimally Conscious State "Plus" and "Minus"
Minimally Conscious State Plus Versus Minus: Likelihood of Emergence and Long-term Functional Independence
1 other identifier
observational
80
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The goal of this observational retrospective study is to investigate and compare the clinical evolution of a sample of patients with the diagnosis of MCS+ versus MCS- according to the CRS-R. The main questions it aims to answer are the presence of differences in the likelihood of emergence from the MCS (EMCS) between these two groups and in the progress of disability and functional independence after the EMCS.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Sep 2004
Longer than P75 for all trials
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 30, 2004
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 15, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 15, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 6, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 20, 2023
CompletedJuly 20, 2023
July 1, 2023
18.4 years
July 6, 2023
July 13, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (9)
Baseline clinical state
Defined by the clinical state (Unresposive Wakefulness Syndrome, Minimally Conscious State, Emergence from Minimally Conscious State).
At admission to the rehabilitation hospital
Baseline neurobehavioral condition
Defined by the score in the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R). The CRS-R consists of 29 hierarchically organised items divided into 6 subscales addressing auditory, visual, motor, oromotor, communication, and arousal processes.
At admission to the rehabilitation hospital
Baseline disability
Defined by scores in the Disability Rating Scale (DRS). The DRS is an 8-item scale that address the three original World Health Organization categories of impairment, disability and handicap. Scores obtained from the Disability Rating Scale can be interpreted as indicators of various levels of disability, including no disability (score of 0), mild (1), partial (2-3), moderate (4-6), moderately severe (7-11), severe (12-16), extremely severe (17-21), vegetative state (22-24), and extreme vegetative state (25-29).
At the admission to the rehabilitation hospital
Progress in the clinical state
Defined by the clinical state (Unresposive Wakefulness Syndrome, Minimally Conscious State, Emergence from Minimally Conscious State).
Weekly assessments from admission to the rehabilitation hospital to discharge, demise, or emergence from MCS, up to 36 months
Progress in the neurobehavioral condition
Defined by the score in the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R). The CRS-R consists of 29 hierarchically organised items divided into 6 subscales addressing auditory, visual, motor, oromotor, communication, and arousal processes.
Weekly assessments from admission to the rehabilitation hospital to discharge, demise, or emergence from MCS, up to 36 months
Progress in disability
Defined by scores in the Disability Rating Scale (DRS). The DRS is an 8-item scale that address the three original World Health Organization categories of impairment, disability and handicap. Scores obtained from the Disability Rating Scale can be interpreted as indicators of various levels of disability, including no disability (score of 0), mild (1), partial (2-3), moderate (4-6), moderately severe (7-11), severe (12-16), extremely severe (17-21), vegetative state (22-24), and extreme vegetative state (25-29).
Monthly assessments from admission to the rehabilitation hospital to discharge, demise, or emergence from MCS, up to 36 months
Follow-up disability
Defined by scores in the Disability Rating Scale (DRS). The DRS is an 8-item scale that address the three original World Health Organization categories of impairment, disability and handicap. Scores obtained from the Disability Rating Scale can be interpreted as indicators of various levels of disability, including no disability (score of 0), mild (1), partial (2-3), moderate (4-6), moderately severe (7-11), severe (12-16), extremely severe (17-21), vegetative state (22-24), and extreme vegetative state (25-29).
At 6 months after emergence from MCS
Follow-up independence in activities of daily living
Defined by scores in the Barthel Index (BI). The BI measures the degree of assistance required by an individual on 10 items of mobility and self care. The scores in the BI can be interpreted as indicators of dependence, such as total dependence (scores below 21), severe dependence (21-60), moderate dependence (61-90), and slight dependence (scores above 90).
At 6 months after emergence from MCS
Follow-up functional Independence
Defined by scores in the Functional Independence Measure (FIM). The FIM is a 18-item that measures independence for self-care, including sphincter control, transfers, locomotion, communication, and social cognition. The total score of the FIM can be interpreted as a general measure of functional independence and also as stages of functional independence within activities of daily living, sphincter management, mobility, and executive function.
At 6 months after emergence from MCS
Study Arms (1)
Patients in a Minimally Conscious State
Patients diagnosed as in a Minimally Conscious State "Plus" and "Minus"
Interventions
Physical therapy and multisensory stimulation adjusted to the needs of each patient.
Eligibility Criteria
Data of patients with DOC who had attended an inpatient neurorehabilitation program between January 2004 and December 2022 in all facilities of the hospital network.
You may qualify if:
- Severe acquired brain injury leading to a Disorder of Consciousness (DOC)
- Persistance of the DOC for a period not inferior to 28 days and not longer than 6 months
- Diagnosis of MCS
- Having a fa follow-up period of no less than 12 months from the onset
You may not qualify if:
- Diagnosis of UWS
- Being younger than 18 years
- DOC persisting more than 6 months
- Absence of follow-up
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Hospitales Nisalead
- Generalitat Valencianacollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Hospitales NISA
Valencia, 46011, Spain
Servicio de Neurorrehabilitación y Daño Cerebral de los Hospitales NISA
Valencia, 46011, Spain
Related Publications (16)
Bareham CA, Allanson J, Roberts N, Hutchinson PJA, Pickard JD, Menon DK, Chennu S. Longitudinal assessments highlight long-term behavioural recovery in disorders of consciousness. Brain Commun. 2019;1(1):fcz017. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcz017. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
PMID: 31886461BACKGROUNDBruno MA, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Thibaut A, Moonen G, Laureys S. From unresponsive wakefulness to minimally conscious PLUS and functional locked-in syndromes: recent advances in our understanding of disorders of consciousness. J Neurol. 2011 Jul;258(7):1373-84. doi: 10.1007/s00415-011-6114-x. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
PMID: 21674197BACKGROUNDBruno MA, Majerus S, Boly M, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Schnakers C, Gosseries O, Boveroux P, Kirsch M, Demertzi A, Bernard C, Hustinx R, Moonen G, Laureys S. Functional neuroanatomy underlying the clinical subcategorization of minimally conscious state patients. J Neurol. 2012 Jun;259(6):1087-98. doi: 10.1007/s00415-011-6303-7. Epub 2011 Nov 12.
PMID: 22081100BACKGROUNDColantonio A, Gerber G, Bayley M, Deber R, Yin J, Kim H. Differential profiles for patients with traumatic and non-traumatic brain injury. J Rehabil Med. 2011 Mar;43(4):311-5. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0783.
PMID: 21347507BACKGROUNDKatz DI, Polyak M, Coughlan D, Nichols M, Roche A. Natural history of recovery from brain injury after prolonged disorders of consciousness: outcome of patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation with 1-4 year follow-up. Prog Brain Res. 2009;177:73-88. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17707-5.
PMID: 19818896BACKGROUNDGiacino JT, Ashwal S, Childs N, Cranford R, Jennett B, Katz DI, Kelly JP, Rosenberg JH, Whyte J, Zafonte RD, Zasler ND. The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology. 2002 Feb 12;58(3):349-53. doi: 10.1212/wnl.58.3.349.
PMID: 11839831BACKGROUNDGiacino JT, Kalmar K, Whyte J. The JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Dec;85(12):2020-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.02.033.
PMID: 15605342BACKGROUNDGolden K, Erler KS, Wong J, Giacino JT, Bodien YG. Should Consistent Command-Following Be Added to the Criteria for Emergence From the Minimally Conscious State? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Sep;103(9):1870-1873. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.03.010. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
PMID: 35398046BACKGROUNDMAHONEY FI, BARTHEL DW. FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX. Md State Med J. 1965 Feb;14:61-5. No abstract available.
PMID: 14258950BACKGROUNDPape TL, Lundgren S, Heinemann AW, Guernon A, Giobbie-Hurder A, Wang J, Roth H, Blahnik M, Williams V. Establishing a prognosis for functional outcome during coma recovery. Brain Inj. 2006 Jun;20(7):743-58. doi: 10.1080/02699050600676933.
PMID: 16809207BACKGROUNDRappaport M, Hall KM, Hopkins K, Belleza T, Cope DN. Disability rating scale for severe head trauma: coma to community. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1982 Mar;63(3):118-23.
PMID: 7073452BACKGROUNDSong M, Yang Y, Yang Z, Cui Y, Yu S, He J, Jiang T. Prognostic models for prolonged disorders of consciousness: an integrative review. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2020 Oct;77(20):3945-3961. doi: 10.1007/s00018-020-03512-z. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
PMID: 32306061BACKGROUNDStineman MG, Ross RN, Fiedler R, Granger CV, Maislin G. Functional independence staging: conceptual foundation, face validity, and empirical derivation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Jan;84(1):29-37. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2003.50061.
PMID: 12589617BACKGROUNDThibaut A, Bodien YG, Laureys S, Giacino JT. Minimally conscious state "plus": diagnostic criteria and relation to functional recovery. J Neurol. 2020 May;267(5):1245-1254. doi: 10.1007/s00415-019-09628-y. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
PMID: 31773246BACKGROUNDWannez S, Heine L, Thonnard M, Gosseries O, Laureys S; Coma Science Group collaborators. The repetition of behavioral assessments in diagnosis of disorders of consciousness. Ann Neurol. 2017 Jun;81(6):883-889. doi: 10.1002/ana.24962.
PMID: 28543735BACKGROUNDKondziella D, Bender A, Diserens K, van Erp W, Estraneo A, Formisano R, Laureys S, Naccache L, Ozturk S, Rohaut B, Sitt JD, Stender J, Tiainen M, Rossetti AO, Gosseries O, Chatelle C; EAN Panel on Coma, Disorders of Consciousness. European Academy of Neurology guideline on the diagnosis of coma and other disorders of consciousness. Eur J Neurol. 2020 May;27(5):741-756. doi: 10.1111/ene.14151. Epub 2020 Feb 23.
PMID: 32090418BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 6, 2023
First Posted
July 20, 2023
Study Start
September 30, 2004
Primary Completion
February 15, 2023
Study Completion
February 15, 2023
Last Updated
July 20, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-07