Effects of Emotional Stimuli in Patients With Disorders of Consciousness
1 other identifier
observational
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Disentangling the vegetative state from the minimally conscious state is often difficult when relying only on behavioral observation. In this study, the investigators explored a new event-related potential paradigm as an alternative method for the detection of voluntary brain activity and cognitive abilities in the patients with disorders of consciousness.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Feb 2015
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 30, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 30, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 18, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 19, 2018
CompletedApril 19, 2018
September 1, 2017
2.5 years
March 18, 2018
April 17, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
electrophysiological index:the cognitive event-related potentional components
The event-related potential waveforms uncover voluntary responses to external stimuli that could assist in detecting signs of consciousness to reduce the risk of misdiagnosis. P300 is a large positive going potential that increases in amplitude from the frontal to parietal electrodes and has a peak latency of about 300 ms for auditory and 400 ms for visual stimuli. And N1 is a negative potential in the posterior superior temporal lobe with the peak latency of about 170ms.Peak amplitudes and latency were obtained for the interest ERP components(N1,P300) .Peak amplitudes and latency for were analysed in a series of repeated-measures ANOVAs for each component (N1, P2), with factors of condition (emotion: mean happy/angry vs. neutral).
from 200 msec before the stimuli onset to 1000ms after the auditory stimulation
Secondary Outcomes (1)
CRS-R(Coma Recovery Scale-Revised)
30 minutes before the auditory stimualtion and 30 minutes after each stimulation
Study Arms (3)
Healthy controls
age-matched right-handed healthy volunteers
the mininally conscious state
Patients present reproducible signs of awareness such as purposeful eye movements or response to verbal order
the vegetative state
Patients preserved autonomous functioning (e.g., preserved sleep-wake cycles),but without awareness of oneself or of the environment
Interventions
Neutral voice is a meaningless sound (namely the interjection "ah") and the emotional stimuli were the same voice pronouncing the same word with an emotional prosody of happiness or sadness.The stimulus material consisted of positive and negative sound selected from the International Affective Digitalized Sounds (IADS) database.In order to identify experimental stimuli sets that were matched for ratings of arousal and valence between the two valence types,investigators used an algorithm to equate normative valence and arousal ratings for the selection of auditory stimuli.
Eligibility Criteria
30 healthy controls and 30 patients in dicorders of consciousness(15 VS and 15 MCS)
You may qualify if:
- Disorders of consciousness (Traumatic brain injury, stroke or anoxic encephalopathy)
- Coma diagnosis (Plum and Posner, 1966), vegetative state (Task Force, 1994) or minimally conscious state (Giacino, Ashwal et al. 2002)
- Lack of autonomic crisis since one week minimum
- Medical condition considered stable
- Patients who do not present hearing loss. Peaks I and II of Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potentials (BAEP) will be normal.
You may not qualify if:
- hearing Problem
- Uncontrolled Epilepsy
- Autonomic crises
- Medical unstable state
- Pregnant or likely to be (interrogation data) or breastfeeding woman
- Healthy controls:
- Subjects with normal hearing
- Absence of neurological disorder
- Subjects able to understand the experimental instructions
- Hearing problems and / or hearing loss higher than 30 decibels Hearing Level (dB HL) at a frequency band from 250 to 8000 Hz
- Neurological disorders
- Pregnant or likely to be (interrogation data) or breastfeeding woman
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hangzhou Hospital of Zhejiang CAPR
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Benyan Luo
The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 18, 2018
First Posted
April 19, 2018
Study Start
February 1, 2015
Primary Completion
July 30, 2017
Study Completion
August 30, 2017
Last Updated
April 19, 2018
Record last verified: 2017-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share