NCT05521841

Brief Summary

Hysterectomy is the second most common major Obstetric/gynecology procedure worldwide and one of the most common procedures in our institute. Post-operative pain is one of the most common complications following hysterectomy. Patients report moderate to severe pain following hysterectomy. Transversus abdominis plane block(TAP) is an established technique for abdominal and pelvic analgesia. Although efficient as an analgesic technique, it lacks visceral analgesia.Erector spinae plane block (ESP) is one of the newer developed regional techniques. Initially developed for Thoracic Neuropathic Pain by Forero et al, its use has expanded to include thoracic, abdominal and even femoral and below knee operative pain management. Objective: The objective of this study is to compare the ESP block with the TAP block for postoperative pain management in cases undergoing Total abdominal hysterectomy. Methods: A hospital based randomized, prospective, interventional study will be performed on all consenting patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy under general anesthesia. The required number of participants will be selected by probability sampling. Fourty four female participants posted for elective Total abdominal hysterectomy under general anesthesia will be randomized onto two groups. The process of randomisation will be via computer generated randomization sequence.Each of the group will receive either of the two intervention after the completion of operative procedure. The post operative anelgesia duration and NRS score will be compared between the two groups. Approval will be taken from the Institutional Review Committee (IRC) of Institute of Medicine. Written consent will be taken prior to the data collection. Data will be entered in Microsoft Excel and errors will be checked. The clean data will be transferred into SPSS v 20 for analysis The results will be presented in terms of frequency percentage and table The associations will be established.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
44

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2022

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 27, 2022

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 30, 2022

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 10, 2022

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 10, 2023

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 10, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

October 19, 2022

Status Verified

October 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

August 27, 2022

Last Update Submit

October 18, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Pain, PostoperativePostoperative analgesiaESP blockTAP blockTAH

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Time of first rescue analgesia within 24hours

    Rescue analgesia used injection Tramadol, given if Numerical rating score(NRS) \>3 withing 24hours of the procedure.

    24hours

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Total amount of rescue analgesia.

    24hours

  • Pain assessment at set time

    24hours

  • Comparision of side effect: Incidence of Respiratory depression,Incidence of sedation, motor block, postoperative nausea and vomiting postoperative nausea and vomiting of intervention

    24hours

Study Arms (2)

Erector Spinae Plane Block

EXPERIMENTAL

Bilateral Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block

Procedure: Erector Spinae Plane Block(Bilateral Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block)

Transversus abdominis plane block

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Bilateral Ultrasound-guided bilateral Transversus abdominis plane block

Procedure: Transversus abdominis plane block(Bilateral Ultrasound-guided bilateral Transversus abdominis plane block)

Interventions

Bilateral USG guided Erector Spinae Plane Block: Drug used 20 ml of 0.25% Bupivacaine in each side. Total 40 ml volume. Dosage 100mg Ultrasound transducer will be placed in a cephalocaudal orientation over the back at 10th thoracic vertebral level. The probe will then slowly be moved laterally until the transverse process is visible The trapezius muscle and erector spinae muscle will be identified as superficial to the transverse process. A 25-gauge Quincke spinal needle (Romsons spinal needle, Quincke type)will be inserted using an in-plane approach in the cephalad to the caudal direction and towards the transverse process. A 5ml bolus of local anesthetic will be given. Erector spinae muscle plane is then visualized separating from the transverse process. The local anesthetic is then injected in 5 ml increments, with aspiration after every 5 ml to avoid intravascular injection Same procedure will be repeated on the other side

Also known as: ESP
Erector Spinae Plane Block

Bilateral Ultrasound-guided bilateral Transversus abdominis plane block Drug used 20 ml of 0.25% Bupivacaine in each side. Total 40 ml volume. Dosage 100mg The linear transducer will be placed in the transverse plane at the lateral abdominal wall in the mid-axillary line, between the lower costal margin and the iliac crest. Abdominal wall muscles (external oblique, internal oblique, and transversus abdominis) will be visualized. Bowel movement and visualization of hypoechoic peritoneum would further guide the block. The needle will be inserted in-plane and advanced until the tip is between the internal oblique and the transversus abdominis muscle. After negative aspiration, 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine is injected in a 5ml increment ,aspirating after every 5ml injection. Same procedure will be repeated on the other side.

Also known as: TAP
Transversus abdominis plane block

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • All cases undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy under GA
  • Age \>18 years
  • Elective cases
  • ASA PS I \& II

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient refusal
  • Patient with contraindication to peripheral Nerve blocks
  • Allergy to local anesthetics
  • Weight less than 50kg

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (16)

  • Wu JM, Wechter ME, Geller EJ, Nguyen TV, Visco AG. Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003. Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Nov;110(5):1091-5. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000285997.38553.4b.

    PMID: 17978124BACKGROUND
  • Lissauer J, Mancuso K, Merritt C, Prabhakar A, Kaye AD, Urman RD. Evolution of the transversus abdominis plane block and its role in postoperative analgesia. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2014 Jun;28(2):117-26. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2014.04.001. Epub 2014 May 9.

    PMID: 24993433BACKGROUND
  • Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):621-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451.

    PMID: 27501016BACKGROUND
  • Kamel AAF, Amin OAI, Ibrahem MAM. Bilateral Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block on Postoperative Analgesia after Total Abdominal Hysterectomy. Pain Physician. 2020 Jul;23(4):375-382.

    PMID: 32709172BACKGROUND
  • Balaban O, Aydin T. Lumbar erector spinae plane catheterization for continuous postoperative analgesia in total knee arthroplasty: A case report. J Clin Anesth. 2019 Aug;55:138-139. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.12.017. Epub 2019 Jan 15. No abstract available.

    PMID: 30658328BACKGROUND
  • Sinatra R. Causes and consequences of inadequate management of acute pain. Pain Med. 2010 Dec;11(12):1859-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00983.x. Epub 2010 Oct 28.

    PMID: 21040438BACKGROUND
  • Pieretti S, Di Giannuario A, Di Giovannandrea R, Marzoli F, Piccaro G, Minosi P, Aloisi AM. Gender differences in pain and its relief. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2016 Apr-Jun;52(2):184-9. doi: 10.4415/ANN_16_02_09.

    PMID: 27364392BACKGROUND
  • Chen EH, Shofer FS, Dean AJ, Hollander JE, Baxt WG, Robey JL, Sease KL, Mills AM. Gender disparity in analgesic treatment of emergency department patients with acute abdominal pain. Acad Emerg Med. 2008 May;15(5):414-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00100.x.

    PMID: 18439195BACKGROUND
  • Rafi AN. Abdominal field block: a new approach via the lumbar triangle. Anaesthesia. 2001 Oct;56(10):1024-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2001.02279-40.x. No abstract available.

    PMID: 11576144BACKGROUND
  • Singh S, Choudhary NK, Lalin D, Verma VK. Bilateral Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Randomized Control Trial. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2020 Oct;32(4):330-334. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000603.

    PMID: 31033625BACKGROUND
  • Boules ML, Goda AS, Abdelhady MA, Abu El-Nour Abd El-Azeem SA, Hamed MA. Comparison of Analgesic Effect Between Erector Spinae Plane Block and Transversus Abdominis Plane Block After Elective Cesarean Section: A Prospective Randomized Single-Blind Controlled Study. J Pain Res. 2020 May 19;13:1073-1080. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S253343. eCollection 2020.

    PMID: 32547172BACKGROUND
  • De Cassai A, Bonvicini D, Correale C, Sandei L, Tulgar S, Tonetti T. Erector spinae plane block: a systematic qualitative review. Minerva Anestesiol. 2019 Mar;85(3):308-319. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.18.13341-4. Epub 2019 Jan 4.

    PMID: 30621377BACKGROUND
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Acute Pain Management. Practice guidelines for acute pain management in the perioperative setting: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Acute Pain Management. Anesthesiology. 2012 Feb;116(2):248-73. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31823c1030. No abstract available.

    PMID: 22227789BACKGROUND
  • Hamed MA, Goda AS, Basiony MM, Fargaly OS, Abdelhady MA. Erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized controlled study original study. J Pain Res. 2019 Apr 30;12:1393-1398. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S196501. eCollection 2019.

    PMID: 31118757BACKGROUND
  • Altinpulluk EY, Ozdilek A, Colakoglu N, Beyoglu CA, Ertas A, Uzel M, Yildirim FG, Altindas F. Bilateral postoperative ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block in open abdominal hysterectomy: a case series and cadaveric investigation. Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care. 2019 Apr;26(1):83-88. doi: 10.2478/rjaic-2019-0013.

    PMID: 31111101BACKGROUND
  • Carney J, McDonnell JG, Ochana A, Bhinder R, Laffey JG. The transversus abdominis plane block provides effective postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy. Anesth Analg. 2008 Dec;107(6):2056-60. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181871313.

    PMID: 19020158BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain, Postoperative

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and Symptoms

Central Study Contacts

Biplov Neupane, MBBS

CONTACT

Basu Dev Parajuli, MBBS, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: hospital based randomized, prospective, interventional study
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Resident, Department of Anesthesiology, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute Of Medicine.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 27, 2022

First Posted

August 30, 2022

Study Start

November 10, 2022

Primary Completion

April 10, 2023

Study Completion

August 10, 2023

Last Updated

October 19, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share