Immersive Training on Metacognitive Capacities of Young People
VRtraining
Effects of Brief Immersive Training on the Metacognitive Capacities and Self-knowledge of Young People
1 other identifier
interventional
55
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Metacognitive abilities and self-knowledge are necessary for psychological maturation and good mental functioning of individuals. It is generally agreed that an adequate representation of oneself and others is essential to establish functional interpersonal relationships. These metacognitive abilities are not adequately developed in patients with various mental health problems, such as personality disorders, eating disorders, psychosis, and depression, and are associated with the severity of the pathology. Self-awareness is a central element that begins to consolidate during adolescence. For that reason, the investigators aim to evaluate the effects of immersive training on the metacognitive abilities and self-knowledge of young people. Based on the repertory grid technique (RGT), our research team has developed a brief immersive training to enhance metacognitive abilities. This intervention facilitates the exploration of personal identity in a safe environment. Specifically, it is an immersion in the person's own world of meanings using Virtual Reality (VR), with the Explore Your Meanings (EYME) tool, a technological platform created to help mental health professionals to enhance the personal development and therapeutic change of their clients. Expected results include an increase in participants' self-concept clarity, metacognition, and reflective function as well as a deeper knowledge about their relationship with various aspects of self-knowledge and self-esteem.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2023
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 14, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 12, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2026
ExpectedFebruary 3, 2026
January 1, 2026
3 years
May 14, 2023
January 30, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change from baseline Self Concept Clarity after two weeks, and at one-month follow-up
Self-concept clarity is assessed with the Self-Concept Clarity Scale (SCCS) created by Campbell et al. (1996) and adapted to Spanish by Feixas, et al (2023).
SCCS will be administered at baseline, after two weeks, and at one-month follow-up.
Change from baseline Metacognition after two weeks, and at one-month follow-up
Metacognition will be assessed with the Metacognition Self-Assessment Scale (MSAS) created by Semerari et al. (2003) and adapted to Spanish by Feixas, et al. (2023).
MSAS will be administered at baseline, after two weeks, and at one-month follow-up.
Change from baseline Reflective Functioning after two weeks, and at one-month follow-up
Reflective Functioning or mentalization will be assessed using the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (RFQ-8) created by Fonagy et al. (2016) and adapted to Spanish by Ruiz-Parra et al (2023).
Frame: RF will be administered at baseline, after two weeks, and at one-month follow-up.
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Change from baseline Self-esteem after two weeks, and at one-month follow-up
RSE will be administered at baseline, after two weeks, and at one-month follow-up.
Change from baseline Psychological distress, after one and two weeks, and at one-month follow-up
CORE-OM will be administered at baseline, after one and two weeks (using short forms version CORE-SFB), and at one-month follow-up.
Change from baseline Depression, Anxiety and Stress, after two weeks and at one-month follow-up
DASS-21 will be administered at baseline, after two weeks, and at one-month follow-up.
Change from Life Satisfaction after two weeks, and at one-month follow-up
LSS will be administered at baseline, after two weeks, and at one-month follow-up.
Satisfaction with intervention
CRES-4 will be administered at the one-month follow-up.
Other Outcomes (1)
Self-knowledge
Self-knowledge assessment will be conducted after one week.
Study Arms (1)
Immersive Training using EYME-Explore Your Meanings
EXPERIMENTALImmersive training based on the RGT and EYME to improve the metacognitive abilities and self-knowledge of young people.
Interventions
Psychological assessment based on the RGT with EYME-Explore Your Meanings, a digital platform to explore the structure and content of personal identity with Virtual Reality.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Volunteers between 18 and 29 years of age
You may not qualify if:
- Diagnosis of a mental disorder (current or in the last year)
- Current psychological or psychiatric treatment
- Suicidal ideation
- Insufficient level of competence to communicate in Spanish or English
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Barcelonalead
- European Unioncollaborator
- Universitat Autonoma de Barcelonacollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Barcelona
Barcelona, Catalonia, 08035, Spain
Related Publications (24)
Bados, A., Solanas, A. y Andrés, R. (2005). Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales. Psicothema, 17, 679-683.
BACKGROUNDCampbell, J. D., Trapnell, P. D., Heine, S. J., Katz, I. M., Lavellee, L. F., y Lehman, D. R. (1996). Self-concept clarity: Measurement, personality correlates, and cultural boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 141-156
BACKGROUNDCarapeto MJ, Feixas G. The Organization of Self-Knowledge in Adolescence: Some Contributions Using the Repertory Grid Technique. Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2020 Feb 5;10(1):408-423. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe10010031.
PMID: 34542494BACKGROUNDEvans C, Connell J, Barkham M, Margison F, McGrath G, Mellor-Clark J, Audin K. Towards a standardised brief outcome measure: psychometric properties and utility of the CORE-OM. Br J Psychiatry. 2002 Jan;180:51-60. doi: 10.1192/bjp.180.1.51.
PMID: 11772852BACKGROUNDFeixas, G., Alabèrnia-Segura, M. & García-Gutiérrez, A. (July, 2022). Using Virtual Reality to investigate self-identity: A case illustration of EYME-Explore Your Meanings. Paper presented in the panel Applied Personality Psychology (Chair: M. Cordero). 20th European Conference of Personality. Madrid
BACKGROUNDFeixas, G., Carulla-Flix, A. et al (2023). Adaptación al español y propiedades psicométricas de la Escala de Autoevaluación de la Metacognición. Manuscript in preparation.
BACKGROUNDFeixas, G. y Cornejo, J. M. (1996). Manual de la técnica de rejilla mediante el programa RECORD ver. 2.0. Barcelona: Paidós.
BACKGROUNDFeixas, G., Fernández-Espejo, M., et al (2023). Adaptación al español y propiedades psicométricas de la Escala de Claridad de Autoconcepto. Manuscript in preparation..
BACKGROUNDFeixas, G., Geldschläger, H., Carmona, M. y Garzón, B. (2002). Sistema de categorías de contenido para codificar constructos personales. Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada, 55, 337-348.
BACKGROUNDFeixas, G., Pucurull, O., Roca, C., Paz, C., García-Grau, E., Bados, A. (2012). Escala de Satisfacción con el tratamiento recibido (CRES-4): La versión en español. Revista de Psicoterapia, 89(23), 51-58.
BACKGROUNDFonagy P, Luyten P, Moulton-Perkins A, Lee YW, Warren F, Howard S, Ghinai R, Fearon P, Lowyck B. Development and Validation of a Self-Report Measure of Mentalizing: The Reflective Functioning Questionnaire. PLoS One. 2016 Jul 8;11(7):e0158678. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158678. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27392018BACKGROUNDFransella, F., Bell, R. y Bannister, D. (2004). A Manual for Repertory Grid Technique (2nd. ed.). Wiley.
BACKGROUNDGarcia-Gutierrez, A. y Feixas, G. (2018). GRIDCOR: A Repertory Grid Analysis Tool (Version 6.0) [Web application]. Retrieved from http://www.repertorygrid.net/en
BACKGROUNDKatznelson H. Reflective functioning: a review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2014 Mar;34(2):107-17. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2013.12.003. Epub 2013 Dec 29.
PMID: 24486522BACKGROUNDKelly, G. A. (1955). The Psychology of Personal Constructs (2 vols). Norton.
BACKGROUNDLang TA, Altman DG. Basic statistical reporting for articles published in biomedical journals: the "Statistical Analyses and Methods in the Published Literature" or the SAMPL Guidelines. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015 Jan;52(1):5-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.09.006. Epub 2014 Sep 28. No abstract available.
PMID: 25441757BACKGROUNDLovibond PF, Lovibond SH. The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behav Res Ther. 1995 Mar;33(3):335-43. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-u.
PMID: 7726811BACKGROUNDMartin-Albo J, Nuniez JL, Navarro JG, Grijalvo F. The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: translation and validation in university students. Span J Psychol. 2007 Nov;10(2):458-67. doi: 10.1017/s1138741600006727.
PMID: 17992972BACKGROUNDMorejón, A. J. V., García-Bóveda, R. J., y Jiménez, R. V. (2004). Escala de autoestima de Rosenberg: fiabilidad y validez en población clínica española. Apuntes de Psicología, 22(2), 247-255.
BACKGROUNDPedone, R., Semerari, A., Riccardi, I., Procacci, M., Nicolò, G., & Carcione, A. (2017). Development of a self-report measure of metacognition: The metacognition self-assessment scale (MSAS). Instrument description and factor structure. Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 14(3), 185-194.
BACKGROUNDRosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton University Press.
BACKGROUNDRuiz-Parra E, Manzano-Garcia G, Mediavilla R, Rodriguez-Vega B, Lahera G, Moreno-Perez AI, Torres-Cantero AM, Rodado-Martinez J, Bilbao A, Gonzalez-Torres MA. The Spanish version of the reflective functioning questionnaire: Validity data in the general population and individuals with personality disorders. PLoS One. 2023 Apr 6;18(4):e0274378. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274378. eCollection 2023.
PMID: 37023214BACKGROUNDTrujillo A, Feixas G, Bados A, Garcia-Grau E, Salla M, Medina JC, Montesano A, Soriano J, Medeiros-Ferreira L, Canete J, Corbella S, Grau A, Lana F, Evans C. Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation - Outcome Measure. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016 Jun 21;12:1457-66. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S103079. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27382288BACKGROUNDNeimeyer, R. A. (1993). Constructivist approaches to the measurement of meaning (pp. 58-103). In G. J. Neimeyer (Ed) Constructivist Assessment: A Casebook. Sage.
BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Guillem Feixas, PhD
University of Barcelona
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Full Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 14, 2023
First Posted
June 12, 2023
Study Start
May 1, 2023
Primary Completion
May 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Last Updated
February 3, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- Data will be available after six months of study completion
- Access Criteria
- Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal whose proposed use of the data has been approved by an independent review committee
Individual participant data for all primary and secondary outcomes, after deidentification