The Efficacy of Treatments to Improve Self-esteem
Self-esteem in a General Psychiatric Population: Comparing Competitive Memory Training (COMET) and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)
1 other identifier
interventional
70
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this study is to examine the effectivity of two self-esteem interventions (COMET (Korrelboom) and CBT (De Neef)) in a general psychiatric population. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- is there a difference between the two interventions in effectiveness on increasing self-esteem?
- is there a difference between the two interventions in effect on levels of anxiety, depression and general mental health?
- are found effects on levels of anxiety, depression and general mental health associated with changes in self-esteem?
- is the ability to use imagination a moderator for outcomes in both conditions? Participants are randomised over both conditions. At baseline (T0), end of treatment (T1) and follow-up at 6 months (T2) several outcome measures are conducted, such as RSES, DASS and MHC-SF.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 14, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 26, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2026
January 29, 2026
January 1, 2026
2.8 years
August 14, 2023
January 27, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Rosenberg self-esteem scale (RSES)
Rosenberg self-esteem scale assesses global selfesteem on a 10-item questionnaire, items to be answered on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (strongly agree) to 3 (strongly disagree). Total scores range from 0 up to 30, with higher scores indicating a higher global self-esteem.
Baseline (T0), end of treatment (T1)(one week after the last intervention session), follow-up (T2 at 6 months)
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS)
Baseline (T0), end of treatment (T1)(one week after the last intervention session), follow-up (T2 at 6 months)
Mental Health Continuum - Short Form (MHC-SF)
Baseline (T0), end of treatment (T1)(one week after the last intervention session), follow-up (T2 at 6 months)
Plymouth Sensory Imagery Questionnaire (PsiQ-NL-35)
Baseline (T0)
Other Outcomes (5)
Demographics
Baseline (T0)
DSM-5 classifications
Baseline (T0)
Medication (type)
Measured from start of treatment until end of treatment (T1)(one week after the last intervention session), and from end of treatment (T1)(one week after the last intervention session) until follow-up (T2 at 6 months)
- +2 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
COMET (Korrelboom)
EXPERIMENTALKorrelbooms' Competitive Memory Training (2011) (abbreviated COMET) is a cognitive behavioral therapy based on counter-conditioning. It uses positive self-verbalizations, imagination, posture and facial expression and music in a protocolized intervention consisting of 8 weekly group sessions of 90 minutes. For this study the protocol is extended with 1 session, to 9 sessions, in concertation with the author.
CBT (De Neef)
EXPERIMENTALThe cognitive behavioural protocol by De Neef (2010; 2018) has not been specifically named but is commonly referred to as 'the whitebook method' or 'cognitive behavioral therapy' (CBT). For convenience, this intervention will be addressed to as CBT in the current study. This intervention relies heavily on positive data logging to specifically focus on evidence that is contradictory to the negative core belief. Patients keep a positive data log (the 'whitebook') to write down positive events and positive qualities of themselves to achieve cognitive bias modification. They also receive psycho-education and practice on alternative behavior such as receiving compliments (which is also regarded as exposure), lowering perfectionist behavior and receiving criticism. In this protocolized intervention patients receive 9 to 11 weekly group sessions of 90 minutes. for this study a version of the protocol with 9 sessions is used.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \- A self-perceived low self-esteem established by both patient and caregiver by means of (consent to) referral for self-esteem treatment.
You may not qualify if:
- severe suicidality for which hospitalization or other forms of crisis care is necessary,
- acute psychosis,
- current manic episode,
- current alcohol or drug abuse,
- insufficient knowledge of the Dutch language,
- illiteracy
- being unable to identify at least one positive aspect of oneself, which does not need to be felt as convincing for the participant. The latter is an excluding criterium formulated by the COMET protocol.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Stichting GGZ Noord-Holland-Noord
Heerhugowaard, North Holland, 1703WC, Netherlands
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Eva Velthorst, PhD
GGZ-NHN
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 14, 2023
First Posted
October 26, 2023
Study Start
November 1, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2026
Last Updated
January 29, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share