Otago Exercise Program And Gaze Stability Exercise In Older Adults
Comparison of Effects of Otago Exercise Program vs. Gaze Stability Exercise on Balance and Fear of Fall in Older Adults
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Fall occurrences and the associated risk of injury are debilitating and major health concerns in the older population. Several interventions have been investigated and implemented to address the needs of balance impairments and to reduce the increased risk of falls. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of the Otago exercise program (OEP) and gaze stability exercises (GSE) on balance and the risk of falls in older adults residing at an old age home facility. 30 elderly participants were equally and randomly divided into two groups: Group OEP received the OEP and group GSE received GSE for eight weeks (thrice a week). In addition, both groups also performed core muscle-strengthening exercises. The Berg balance scale (BBS) and the Fall efficacy scale-International (FES-I) were the outcome measures.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 10, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 21, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 12, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 23, 2023
CompletedMarch 27, 2023
March 1, 2023
3 months
March 12, 2023
March 23, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
This tool encompasses both static and dynamic balance components across 14 different activities (5 static and 9 dynamic) performed by the patient graded on varying difficulty levels for different balance conditions (sitting balance, standing up, turning around, walking on an even surface, walking on steps, and while changing body position). The BBS utilizes an ordinal grading on a 5-point scale (0-4) to rate the 14 task items, producing a global score of 56 with the lower score assigned to poor performance (score-0) and a greater score representing the better outcomes (score-4).
8 weeks.
Fall efficacy Scale- International (FES-I)
The FES-I form consists of 16 items related to various functional activities. The participant is asked to rate the level of each activity on a 4-point Likert scale. A higher score implies a greater fear of falls and lower score imply better outcomes.
8 weeks.
Study Arms (2)
Otago exercise program group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants performed Otago exercise program and core muscle strengthening exercises for eight weeks (thrice a week).
Gaze stability exercises group
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants performed Gaze stability exercises and core muscle strengthening exercises for eight weeks (thrice a week).
Interventions
Otago exercise program consisted of strengthening and balance exercises. The strengthening exercises focus on major lower limb muscles. Progression of exercises was done by increasing the duration and then intensity. Balance exercises involved knee bends, backward walking, walking, and turning around, sideways walking, tandem stance (heel to toe), tandem walk (heal to toe walk), one leg stand, heel walking, toe walk, heel to toe walking backward, sit to stand and stair walking. Balance exercises progressed with varying levels of support depending on their balance and confidence. The individuals repeated each exercise 10 times.
The exercise protocol in Gaze Stability exercises included adaptation exercises and substitution exercises. In adaptation exercises, individuals performed rapid, active head rotations while watched a visual target with the target remaining stationary. Substitution exercises, individual performed eye-head movements between targets with the goal of seeing clearly during the task. That target moved in the opposite direction of head movement. Adaptation exercises included: Horizontal and vertical (stationary target) viewing exercises done with a near target, sitting. Horizontal and vertical (stationary target) viewing exercises done with near and far targets (6-10 feet), sitting. Horizontal and vertical (stationary target) viewing exercises were done with near and far targets, standing.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participants were independent in ambulation
- They were performing activities of daily living independently
- They had impaired balance having Berg Balance Scale (BBS) score between 35-45
- They had dynamic Gait Index score between 11-19
- They had mini-mental status exam scores \> 22
You may not qualify if:
- severe vision or hearing impairment,
- neurological disorders including epilepsy, Alzheimer's disease, vertigo, Parkinson's disease, etc.,
- muscular disorders which limit functional activity (Osteoarthritis, Rheumatoid arthritis, etc.),
- taking medications that affect balance,
- severe cardiovascular conditions,
- recent Lower limb injury or Surgery,
- obesity
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
King Saud University
Riyadh, 11433, Saudi Arabia
Related Publications (1)
Kp N, D A, Nawed A, Nuhmani S, Khan M, Alghadir AH. Comparison of effects of Otago exercise program vs gaze stability exercise on balance and fear of fall in older adults: A randomized trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jun 7;103(23):e38345. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038345.
PMID: 38847714DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Masood Khan, M.P.Th.
King Saud University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 12, 2023
First Posted
March 23, 2023
Study Start
November 1, 2020
Primary Completion
February 10, 2021
Study Completion
June 21, 2021
Last Updated
March 27, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share