NCT03376334

Brief Summary

This study intended to investigate the effect of imagining a movement task on dynamic balance of sedentary university students. Two groups with good mental imaging ability were studied; one group receiving instructions on mental imagery and the other served as a control receiving no particular intervention. Any improvement in the balance ability was measured using the star excursion balance test (SEBT); for it has good to excellent test-retest reliability and validity as established by several researchers.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
25

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2014

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 2, 2014

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 25, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 25, 2015

Completed
2.6 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 12, 2017

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 18, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

December 18, 2017

Status Verified

December 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

December 12, 2017

Last Update Submit

December 12, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

Mental motor imagerySEBT

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Dynamic Balance

    Ability to balance while performing a task i.e. lower limb reach distance is various directions measured using star excursion balance test

    24 days

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Time for improvement in balance

    7 to 24 days

Study Arms (2)

Motor Imagery (MI)

EXPERIMENTAL

Those meeting the inclusion criteria were selected (n=22). Each participant was necessary to complete the Movement Imagery Questionnaire in a quiet room. Finally, each participant assigned a score by using a 7-point scale regarding the ease/difficulty associated with representing each movement mentally. Next their baseline balance measurement was performed using the SEBT. Later this group had 9 motor imagery sessions, each session for 15 minutes, 3 sessions (alternate days) per week for a total of 3 weeks. Reassessment of balance was done after every 3 sessions.

Other: Mental Motor Imagery

Control (C)

NO INTERVENTION

Those meeting the inclusion criteria were selected (n=10). Baseline measurement of SEBT was done on day 1, end of week 1, end of week 2 and end of week 3.

Interventions

Motor Imagery (MI)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 25 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • No prior involvement in any physical or mental balance training
  • Good mental imaging ability as determined using the motor imagery questionnaire

You may not qualify if:

  • neuromusculoskeletal condition that may alter balance
  • vestibular disorders or VBA related disorders
  • painful conditions of the body
  • H/o seizure, schizophrenia, meningitis, migraine, diplopia, spinal injuries, lower extremity injuries

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman

Cheras, Selangor, 43000, Malaysia

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Hosseini SA, Fallahpour M, Sayadi M, Gharib M, Haghgoo H. The impact of mental practice on stroke patients' postural balance. J Neurol Sci. 2012 Nov 15;322(1-2):263-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2012.07.030. Epub 2012 Aug 1.

Study Officials

  • PRAMOD D SHENOY, MPT

    Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Yee Mun Chang

    Alumnus of Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The outcome assessor (using balance test) was not aware of neither the group to which the subject belonged nor to the baseline values of the subjects' balance score
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: One group received Mental Motor Imagery training, and the other group acted as a control with no specific intervention.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Mr

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 12, 2017

First Posted

December 18, 2017

Study Start

October 2, 2014

Primary Completion

May 25, 2015

Study Completion

May 25, 2015

Last Updated

December 18, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations