The Effect of Baby-Led Weaning and Traditional Complementary Feeding Education on Infant Development
2 other identifiers
interventional
62
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this \[type of study: clinical trial\] is to compare compare the nutrition, development, obesity risk and anemia risk of the infant with the BLW method and TCF method given to the mothers of infants who have switched to complementary feeding. The main question\[s\] it aims to answer are:
- Does the training on the GTB and BLW method given in accordance with the developmental age of the baby in months have an effect on the feeding and development of the babies in both groups?
- Does the training on the GTB and BLW method given in accordance with the developmental age of the baby in months have an effect on the obesity risk and anemia risk of babies in both groups? Participants will participate in each session of the complementary nutrition trainings given in accordance with their age on a monthly basis and will provide a diet suitable for the trainings. Researchers will compare the nutritional parameters, developmental levels, and height and weight gains of infants fed with the BLW and TCF method to see the effect of complementary feeding education on the nutrition and development of infants and whether there is anemia and obesity risk.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 18, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 18, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 18, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 5, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 16, 2023
CompletedMarch 16, 2023
March 1, 2023
3 months
February 5, 2023
March 4, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Effect on infant growth
BMI of babies were used as growth criteria. In addition, Z-score values for BMI were examined according to WHO standards.
Examining the change at 12 months
Effect on infant developmenter parameter
In the evaluation of infant development, motor developmental evaluation criteria used as standard in the national infant follow-ups of the T.C. Ministry of Health were used.
Examining the change at 12 months
Effect on infant anemia and iron deficiency
Iron levels in infants were examined.
Examining the change at 12 months.
Effect on infant obesity risk
The 12-month BMI distributions of the groups were analyzed.
Examining the change at 12 months.
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Early transition to solid food
Examining the change at 12 months.
Early transition to self feeding
Examining the change at 12 months
Early transition to family meals
Examining the change at 12 months.
Study Arms (2)
Baby-Led Weaning (BLW)
EXPERIMENTALThe group named for infants who received complementary feeding education with the BLW method and who were fed with the BLW method.
Traditional Complementary Feeding (TCF)
EXPERIMENTALThe group named for infants who received complementary nutrition education with the TCF method and who were fed with the TCF method.
Interventions
BLW trainings given to mothers for 6-12 month old babies
TCF trainings given to mothers for 6-12 month old babies
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- for mothers;
- The fact that the mothers came to the center where the research will be conducted for routine baby follow-up and vaccination follow-up.
- Mothers' willingness to participate in the research
- Absence of any communication problems
- The mothers must be at least 19 years old.
- Mothers have no physical or mental disability
- for babies;
- Babies must be at least 4 months and maximum 6 months old when they are included in the study.
- Complementary feeding not yet started
- Babies being fed only with breast milk
- Babies not born before 38 weeks of gestation
- Absence of a congenital anomaly
- Absence of any digestive and neurological system diseases that may affect nutrition
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
ZonguldakBEU
Zonguldak, +90(544) 382 67 16, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (17)
Cameron SL, Taylor RW, Heath AL. Development and pilot testing of Baby-Led Introduction to SolidS--a version of Baby-Led Weaning modified to address concerns about iron deficiency, growth faltering and choking. BMC Pediatr. 2015 Aug 26;15:99. doi: 10.1186/s12887-015-0422-8.
PMID: 26306667BACKGROUNDCameron SL, Taylor RW, Heath AL. Parent-led or baby-led? Associations between complementary feeding practices and health-related behaviours in a survey of New Zealand families. BMJ Open. 2013 Dec 9;3(12):e003946. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003946.
PMID: 24327363BACKGROUNDCameron SL, Heath AL, Taylor RW. How feasible is Baby-led Weaning as an approach to infant feeding? A review of the evidence. Nutrients. 2012 Nov 2;4(11):1575-609. doi: 10.3390/nu4111575.
PMID: 23201835BACKGROUNDDaniels L, Taylor RW, Williams SM, Gibson RS, Fleming EA, Wheeler BJ, Taylor BJ, Haszard JJ, Heath AM. Impact of a modified version of baby-led weaning on iron intake and status: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 27;8(6):e019036. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019036.
PMID: 29950456BACKGROUNDDaniels L, Heath AL, Williams SM, Cameron SL, Fleming EA, Taylor BJ, Wheeler BJ, Gibson RS, Taylor RW. Baby-Led Introduction to SolidS (BLISS) study: a randomised controlled trial of a baby-led approach to complementary feeding. BMC Pediatr. 2015 Nov 12;15:179. doi: 10.1186/s12887-015-0491-8.
PMID: 26563757BACKGROUNDWilliams Erickson L, Taylor RW, Haszard JJ, Fleming EA, Daniels L, Morison BJ, Leong C, Fangupo LJ, Wheeler BJ, Taylor BJ, Te Morenga L, McLean RM, Heath AM. Impact of a Modified Version of Baby-Led Weaning on Infant Food and Nutrient Intakes: The BLISS Randomized Controlled Trial. Nutrients. 2018 Jun 7;10(6):740. doi: 10.3390/nu10060740.
PMID: 29880769BACKGROUNDMorison BJ, Taylor RW, Haszard JJ, Schramm CJ, Williams Erickson L, Fangupo LJ, Fleming EA, Luciano A, Heath AL. How different are baby-led weaning and conventional complementary feeding? A cross-sectional study of infants aged 6-8 months. BMJ Open. 2016 May 6;6(5):e010665. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010665.
PMID: 27154478BACKGROUNDRobert RC, Creed-Kanashiro HM, Villasante R, Narro MR, Penny ME. Strengthening health services to deliver nutrition education to promote complementary feeding and healthy growth of infants and young children: formative research for a successful intervention in peri-urban Trujillo, Peru. Matern Child Nutr. 2017 Apr;13(2):e12264. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12264. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
PMID: 26931182BACKGROUNDTaylor RW, Williams SM, Fangupo LJ, Wheeler BJ, Taylor BJ, Daniels L, Fleming EA, McArthur J, Morison B, Erickson LW, Davies RS, Bacchus S, Cameron SL, Heath AM. Effect of a Baby-Led Approach to Complementary Feeding on Infant Growth and Overweight: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Sep 1;171(9):838-846. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.1284.
PMID: 28692728BACKGROUNDBrown A, Lee M. An exploration of experiences of mothers following a baby-led weaning style: developmental readiness for complementary foods. Matern Child Nutr. 2013 Apr;9(2):233-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2011.00360.x. Epub 2011 Nov 28.
PMID: 22118242BACKGROUNDSazawal S, Dhingra P, Dhingra U, Gupta S, Iyengar V, Menon VP, Sarkar A, Black RE. Compliance with home-based fortification strategies for delivery of iron and zinc: its effect on haematological and growth markers among 6-24 months old children in north India. J Health Popul Nutr. 2014 Jun;32(2):217-26.
PMID: 25076659BACKGROUNDD'Auria E, Bergamini M, Staiano A, Banderali G, Pendezza E, Penagini F, Zuccotti GV, Peroni DG; Italian Society of Pediatrics. Baby-led weaning: what a systematic review of the literature adds on. Ital J Pediatr. 2018 May 3;44(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s13052-018-0487-8.
PMID: 29724233BACKGROUNDESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition; Agostoni C, Braegger C, Decsi T, Kolacek S, Koletzko B, Michaelsen KF, Mihatsch W, Moreno LA, Puntis J, Shamir R, Szajewska H, Turck D, van Goudoever J. Breast-feeding: A commentary by the ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2009 Jul;49(1):112-25. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31819f1e05.
PMID: 19502997RESULTAlvisi P, Brusa S, Alboresi S, Amarri S, Bottau P, Cavagni G, Corradini B, Landi L, Loroni L, Marani M, Osti IM, Povesi-Dascola C, Caffarelli C, Valeriani L, Agostoni C. Recommendations on complementary feeding for healthy, full-term infants. Ital J Pediatr. 2015 Apr 28;41:36. doi: 10.1186/s13052-015-0143-5.
PMID: 25928205RESULTBrown A, Jones SW, Rowan H. Baby-Led Weaning: The Evidence to Date. Curr Nutr Rep. 2017;6(2):148-156. doi: 10.1007/s13668-017-0201-2. Epub 2017 Apr 29.
PMID: 28596930RESULTBrown A. No difference in self-reported frequency of choking between infants introduced to solid foods using a baby-led weaning or traditional spoon-feeding approach. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2018 Aug;31(4):496-504. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12528. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
PMID: 29205569RESULTArslan N, Kurtuncu M, Turhan PM. The effect of baby-led weaning and traditional complementary feeding trainings on baby development. J Pediatr Nurs. 2023 Nov-Dec;73:196-203. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2023.09.006. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
PMID: 37714048DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
NURTEN ARSLAN
Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The participants who were assigned to the researcher groups that evaluated the hematological test results of the babies and followed the growth were kept confidential from the interventions. The person evaluating the outcomes was kept confidential from the participant and the interventions. Participants did not know about the other intervention group.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- lecturer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 5, 2023
First Posted
March 16, 2023
Study Start
January 18, 2021
Primary Completion
April 18, 2021
Study Completion
April 18, 2022
Last Updated
March 16, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR
- Time Frame
- Data can be shared immediately after summary data is published.
- Access Criteria
- The data were shared with the statistician for analysis.
The researcher who made the evaluation did not have information about the experimental groups and which group the individuals were assigned to.