NCT05702294

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to give an answer to the question of whether an automated calculation of voided volumes would produce a more accurate set of bladder diary data when compared to the traditional ''eye-balling'' method of estimated voided volumes of paper bladder diaries, in female adult patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). The main question\[s\] it aims to answer are:

  • Does an automated measurement of voided volumes improve the accuracy of bladder diary data?
  • Does an automated measurement of voided volumes improve the utility of bladder diaries? Participants will be asked to:
  • void in the disposable measuring jug and record their estimated voided volume for a total of three consecutive days in a paper diary (as per usual care).
  • transfer their voided volume from the disposable jug to the automated vessel (diary pod) after each void for the same three consecutive days. The reports generated from the paper diaries (estimated volumes) will be compared to the reports generated from the electronic automated measurement of voided volumes to understand whether there is a clinically significant difference between the two. The investigators aim to recruit healthy female adult volunteers with no lower urinary tract symptoms to understand the normal voiding patterns and volumes of adult females using the diary pod. The investigators will also recruit adult females with lower urinary tract symptoms and compare the two methods of capturing the voided volume

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
187

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2022

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 14, 2022

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 20, 2022

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 27, 2023

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 6, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 6, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

February 23, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.9 years

First QC Date

December 20, 2022

Last Update Submit

February 19, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

electronic bladder diariespaper bladder diariesOveractive bladderautomated measurementvoided volumeurgency urinary incontinence

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of participants with a difference of more than 5% between the estimated recorded voided volumes in milliliters (mL) and the voided volume recorded in milliliters (mL) by the automated device.

    The investigators will compare the estimated volumes documented in milliliters (mL) on the paper diary by the participant versus the volumes calculated in milliliters (mL) automatically by the electronic device for each participant. The investigators will calculate the number of participants with a difference greater than 5% between the volumes estimated in their paper bladder diary ( in mL) and the volumes measured ( in mL) automatically by their device . An error of plus or minus 5% of the voided volume in milliliters is the acceptable range as defined by the guidelines of the International Continence Society that provide a benchmark for all urodynamic equipment.

    After completion of the three day bladder diary ( both paper and electronic version) of all study recruits

Study Arms (1)

Intervention group

EXPERIMENTAL

Adult females with and without lower urinary tract symptoms will complete a 3-day paper bladder diary. After each void they will transfer their voided volume to the diary pod (vessel that calculates automatically the voided volume) for the duration of these three days. After three days the voided volume estimates of the paper diary versus the recorded voided volumes from the electronic diary pod will be compared.

Device: Diary pod ( measuring vessel that automatically calculates voided volume)

Interventions

Female study participants with and without Lower Urinary tract Symptoms will be required to void in the measuring cup and write down their estimates on the paper diary and then transfer the voided volume to the diary pod provided (or vice versa).

Also known as: Minze diary pod
Intervention group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Females
  • years of age or above
  • Females presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms

You may not qualify if:

  • Females who have a mental/physical disability which would make them unable to understand/comply with the requirements of the study.
  • Eligibility criteria for healthy volunteers:
  • Female
  • years of age or above
  • Females who have a mental/physical disability which would make them unable to understand/comply with the requirements of the study.
  • Female with (LUTS).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital

Birmingham, B15 2TG, United Kingdom

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Lower Urinary Tract SymptomsUrinary Bladder, Overactive

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Urological ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsUrinary Bladder DiseasesUrologic DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesMale Urogenital Diseases

Study Officials

  • Philip Toozs-Hobson, MD

    Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • ILIAS LIAPIS, MD

    Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: The investigators aim to demonstrate error in "eye-ball" (traditional method of estimating voided volumes) and increased accuracy of the automated vessel to within the internationally recognized standard of 5% using a flowmeter as the gold standard. The investigators will achieve that by: A. Performing Bench testing. In vitro assessment to demonstrate error in "eye-ball" (traditional method of estimating voided volumes) and increased accuracy to within the internationally recognized standard of 5% using a flowmeter as the gold standard. B. Recruiting healthy volunteers to develop more accurate nomograms of bladder function. The healthy volunteers group will be blinded to the automatic cup measurements. C. Using the tool with women presenting to the Urogynaecology service using the conventional "eye-balling " method and automated uroflowmetry system to assess error from eye-balling and assess how the bladder diary changes comparing the two methods.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 20, 2022

First Posted

January 27, 2023

Study Start

September 14, 2022

Primary Completion

August 6, 2024

Study Completion

August 6, 2024

Last Updated

February 23, 2026

Record last verified: 2023-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations