NCT05646914

Brief Summary

The complex training starts with a high load of resistance training that is succeeded by plyometric training. This combination aims at improving the efficacy of the plyometric training stimulus, thus increasing the neuromuscular response, explosive strength, and power. This response might further be improved by making appropriate variations in the dosage parameters of complex training. Previously available literature reports conflicting evidence, with some studies supporting the effectiveness of complex training for improving power output in sports, whereas others contradict this rationale. There is a paucity of research evidence that directly compares the efficacy of plyometric and complex training for the outcomes of physical performance in cricket players.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
42

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2015

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 15, 2015

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 23, 2016

Completed
24 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 16, 2016

Completed
6.5 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 5, 2022

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 12, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

December 12, 2022

Status Verified

December 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

December 5, 2022

Last Update Submit

December 5, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Muscle strengthFitnessAthletesExercisePower

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Core Muscle Strength

    Athletes assumed a pike position with the elbows under the shoulders, the forearms shoulder-width apart on the floor, toes on the floor, buttocks in a neutral position, and the body in a straight line.

    4 weeks.

  • Multistage Fitness

    For this test, the subject had to run between two lines marked 66 feet apart (20 meters). Pre-recorded beeps were played, and the subjects had to increase their speed with each beep, thereby determining their aerobic fitness based on the number of laps completed.

    4 weeks.

  • Push-Up

    The subjects performed the push-up with their hands and toes touching the floor. In the eccentric phase, the subjects moved down until they were at a 5 cm distance from the floor. The total number of push-ups completed in proper form was counted.

    4 weeks.

  • Lateral Cone Jump

    Two cones were kept with a crossbar or tape fastened across them with the subject standing on one side. The subjects were made to jump to cross the bar and land on the opposite side. The time was started as soon as the subject's foot left the ground, and the total number of lateral jumps performed in 30 seconds was counted.

    4 weeks.

  • Stationary Vertical Jump

    A tape measure was attached to the wall, with the subject standing adjacent to it. They were supposed to touch the highest point on the wall with their inked middle fingertip. This point was taken as the standing height of the subject. Then, the subject performed a vertical jump with the assistance of both arms and legs to reach the maximum possible height and marked the wall with their inked middle fingertip. The difference between the two points was calculated as the final score.

    4 weeks.

Study Arms (3)

Complex training group

EXPERIMENTAL

Plyometric exercises along with resistance exercises were performed.

Other: Complex training exercises

Plyometric training group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Plyometric exercises were performed.

Other: Plyometric training exercises

Control group

NO INTERVENTION

Routine training was performed.

Interventions

Squats and drop jumps, Barbell step-ups and hops, Bench press and plyometric press-up, Barbell lunge and box jumps were performed.

Complex training group

Drop Jumps, Hops, Plyometric press-up, Box Jumps were performed.

Plyometric training group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 26 Years
Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • University-level cricket players
  • Age of 18 to 26 years
  • Playing competitively at least once a month
  • Involved in resistance training for at least six months
  • Working knowledge of the english language

You may not qualify if:

  • A history of severe neurological deficit, injury or concussion in the past six months,
  • Operative treatment for lower or upper limb in the past six months,
  • Current musculoskeletal pain (any level of chronicity)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

King Saud University

Riyadh, 11433, Saudi Arabia

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Ali K, Gupta S, Hussain ME, Alzhrani M, Manzar MD, Khan M, Alghadir AH. Effect of plyometric versus complex training on core strength, lower limb, and upper limb power in male cricketers: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2023 Nov 27;15(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s13102-023-00771-8.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Motor Activity

Interventions

Plyometric Exercise

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavior

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Exercise TherapyRehabilitationAftercareContinuity of Patient CarePatient CareTherapeuticsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesPhysical Conditioning, HumanExerciseMotor ActivityMovementMusculoskeletal Physiological PhenomenaMusculoskeletal and Neural Physiological Phenomena

Study Officials

  • Masood Khan, M.P.Th

    King Saud University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Outcome assessor was kept blinded to allocation of participants.
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: A randomized control study with a pretest-posttest design.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 5, 2022

First Posted

December 12, 2022

Study Start

December 15, 2015

Primary Completion

May 23, 2016

Study Completion

June 16, 2016

Last Updated

December 12, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations