NCT06226246

Brief Summary

This study aims to compare the effect of conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training and CPR training with added virtual reality (VR) on trainee self-efficacy.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
75

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 3, 2024

Completed
23 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 26, 2024

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2024

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 23, 2024

Completed
7 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 30, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

December 13, 2024

Status Verified

December 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

January 3, 2024

Last Update Submit

December 9, 2024

Conditions

Cardiac Arrest

Keywords

CPR educationVirtual reality

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Modified Basic Resuscitation Skills Self-Efficacy scale

    Modified Basic Resuscitation Skills Self-Efficacy scale (Modified BRS-SES): The scale consists of 8 questionnaires with a 5-point Likert scale. After aggregating the scores, the score is converted to a scale of 100 points, with a minimum score of 20 and a maximum of 100. A higher score indicates a higher level of self-efficacy.

    Immediately before training and immediately after the training program

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • System Usability Scale

    Immediately after the VR training program

Study Arms (2)

HEROS VR

EXPERIMENTAL

Trainee trained by HEROS VR CPR training program

Behavioral: HEROS VR CPR training program

Conventional HEROS

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Trainee trained by conventional HEROS CPR training program

Behavioral: Conventional HEROS CPR training program

Interventions

HEROS VR CPR training programBEHAVIORAL

HEROS VR training program which combined video training and VR session

HEROS VR
Conventional HEROS CPR training programBEHAVIORAL

Conventional HEROS training program using video learning

Conventional HEROS

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Non-medical personnel aged 18\~65

You may not qualify if:

  • Who have received CPR training within the past 1 year.
  • For whom it is difficult to wear the VR equipment due to a history of side effects or problems such as head trauma.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center

Seoul, Seoul, 07061, South Korea

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Park GJ, Kong SYJ, Song KJ, Shin SD, Kim TH, Ro YS, Myklebust H, Birkenes TS. The Effectiveness of a New Dispatcher-Assisted Basic Life Support Training Program on Quality in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Performance During Training and Willingness to Perform Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Study. Simul Healthc. 2020 Oct;15(5):318-325. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000435.

    PMID: 32604135BACKGROUND

  • Gurusamy KS, Aggarwal R, Palanivelu L, Davidson BR. Virtual reality training for surgical trainees in laparoscopic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21;(1):CD006575. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006575.pub2.

    PMID: 19160288BACKGROUND

  • Aim F, Lonjon G, Hannouche D, Nizard R. Effectiveness of Virtual Reality Training in Orthopaedic Surgery. Arthroscopy. 2016 Jan;32(1):224-32. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.07.023. Epub 2015 Sep 26.

    PMID: 26412672BACKGROUND

  • Nas J, Thannhauser J, Vart P, van Geuns RJ, Muijsers HEC, Mol JQ, Aarts GWA, Konijnenberg LSF, Gommans DHF, Ahoud-Schoenmakers SGAM, Vos JL, van Royen N, Bonnes JL, Brouwer MA. Effect of Face-to-Face vs Virtual Reality Training on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Mar 1;5(3):328-335. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.4992.

    PMID: 31734702BACKGROUND

  • Zheng J, Du L, Deng X, Zhang L, Wang J, Chen G. Efficacy of virtual reality techniques in cardiopulmonary resuscitation training: protocol for a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and trial sequential analysis. BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 11;12(2):e058827. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058827.

    PMID: 35149577BACKGROUND

  • Hernandez-Padilla J, Suthers F, Fernandez-Sola C, Granero-Molina J. Development and psychometric assessment of the Basic Resuscitation Skills Self-Efficacy Scale. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2016 Apr;15(3):e10-8. doi: 10.1177/1474515114562130. Epub 2014 Nov 24.

    PMID: 25422522BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Heart Arrest

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • STEPHEN LEE, MD, MA

    SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 3, 2024

First Posted

January 26, 2024

Study Start

April 1, 2024

Primary Completion

September 23, 2024

Study Completion

September 30, 2024

Last Updated

December 13, 2024

Record last verified: 2023-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations

KR(1)