NCT05598255

Brief Summary

Male infant circumcision is a frequently performed, but painful procedure. A variety of methods, both systemic and locoregional, have been developed to overcome postoperative pain after circumcision. It has been shown that local anesthetic techniques are more effective than opioids. Especially caudal block and dorsal penile nerve block provide adequate early analgesia (up to 2 hours) after circumcision. Although the postoperative analgesic effects of CB and DPNB have been evaluated in literature before, these two techniques that are commonly used in circumcision surgery in the paediatric population, have not yet been compared when using DXM as an adjuvant in both methods. On the other hand, to our knowledge there is no evidence that indicates any other advantage than a reduced incidence in PONV when it comes to circumcision patients having a DNPB with IV DXM. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the analgesic effect of CB using levobupivacain with IV DXM compared to DPNB using levobupivacain with IV DXM and DPNB without IV DXM. It is questioned whether the addition of IV DXM to the DPNB might shift our standard of care towards a locoregional technique avoiding the neuraxial route, without losing the analgesic quality of the combination of a CB with IV DXM.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
54

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2022

Typical duration for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2022

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 7, 2022

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 28, 2022

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2024

Completed
1 day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

June 5, 2025

Status Verified

June 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2.5 years

First QC Date

July 7, 2022

Last Update Submit

June 3, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Locoregional techniquepostoperative analgesic effectscaudal blockadedorsal penile nerve block

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Postoperative analgesic effect

    Analgesic effect of a caudal blockade after circumcision in paediatric patients compared to dorsal penile nerve block after circumcision in paediatric patients measured by the FLACC scale (= Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability) at 30 minutes, 1, 2, 6, 12 and 24 hours postoperative

    24 hours postoperative

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Need for escape analgesia

    From PACU admission until hospital discharge (up to 48 hours)

  • Incidence of nausea and vomiting (PONV)

    From PACU admission until 24 hours postoperative

  • Time to micturition

    From PACU admission until hospital discharge (up to 48 hours) (measured every 30 minutes starting from PACU admission until hospital discharge)

  • Total procedure time

    perioperative

  • Length of hospital stay

    From hospital admission until hospital discharge (up to 48 hours)

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Caudal blockade (with levobupivacaine) and dexamethasone IV

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Administration of levobupivacaine 0,25% 0,5 ml/kg through the hiatus sacralis lege artis. IV administration of dexamethasone 0,5mg/kg (max. 5mg) during standard anaesthetic management.

Drug: DexamethasoneProcedure: Caudale Blockade with levobupivacaine

Dorsal penile nerve block (with levobupivacaine) and dexamethasone IV

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Administration of levobupivacaine 0,5% 0,1ml/kg on each side of the midline as described in Hadzic's textbook of regional anaesthesia. IV administration of dexamethasone 0,5mg/kg (max. 5mg) during standard anaesthetic management.

Drug: DexamethasoneProcedure: Dorsal penile nerve block with levobupivacaine

Dorsal penile nerve block (with levobupivacaine)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Administration of levobupivacaine 0,5% 0,1ml/kg on each side of the midline as described in Hadzic's textbook of regional anaesthesia.

Procedure: Dorsal penile nerve block with levobupivacaine

Interventions

During standard anaesthetic management: IV administration of dexamethasone (0,5mg/kg, with a maximum dose of 5mg).

Caudal blockade (with levobupivacaine) and dexamethasone IVDorsal penile nerve block (with levobupivacaine) and dexamethasone IV

Administration of levobupivacaine 0,25%0,5ml/kg through the hiatus sacralis lege artis, before incision.

Caudal blockade (with levobupivacaine) and dexamethasone IV

Administration of levobupivacaine 0,5% 0,1ml/kg on each side of the midline as described in Hadzic's textbook of regional anaesthesia, before incision.

Dorsal penile nerve block (with levobupivacaine)Dorsal penile nerve block (with levobupivacaine) and dexamethasone IV

Eligibility Criteria

Age1 Year - 7 Years
Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Male paediatric patients, between ≥ 1 and \< 7 years of age
  • Patients scheduled for paediatric male circumcision (sleeve resection technique)
  • Signed written informed consent form

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients known with allergy to study medication (in this case levobupivacaine, dexamethasone, tramadol, diclofenac, paracetamol, sufentanil)
  • ASA score 3 or higher (ASA physical satus classification system)
  • Delayed motor development/inability to stand up
  • Patients who receive medication that could possibly interact with levobupivacaine (mexiletine, ketoconazole, theophylline)
  • Patients who simultaneous participate in another interventional clinical trial
  • Inability of parents to understand Dutch in a sufficient way
  • Soft tissue infection in the area of the procedure
  • Coagulation disorder
  • Spina bifida
  • Autism spectrum disorder
  • Ulcus ventriculi and duodeni
  • Systemic fungal, bacterial and parasitic infections
  • Administration of live or live-attenuated vaccins during the use of dexamethasone

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

AZ Maria Middelares Gent

Ghent, Oost Vlaanderen, 9000, Belgium

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

DexamethasoneLevobupivacaine

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PregnadienetriolsPregnadienesPregnanesSteroidsFused-Ring CompoundsPolycyclic CompoundsSteroids, FluorinatedBupivacaineAnilidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAniline CompoundsAmines

Study Officials

  • Joris Goossens, MD

    Algemeen Ziekenhuis Maria Middelares

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
patient and parents, recovery nurses and study nurse will be blinded.
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 7, 2022

First Posted

October 28, 2022

Study Start

July 1, 2022

Primary Completion

December 31, 2024

Study Completion

January 1, 2025

Last Updated

June 5, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations